Postponed ICO after bounty campaign | Bitcointalksearch.org

shesheboy

full member

Activity: 714

Merit: 114

Quote from: libert19 on January 25, 2019, 11:24:56 PM

These ICOs should either start bounty campaigns after minimum funds are raised

Some ico's are already doing this idea but idk if this can guarantee a sure success or not because i havent try to participate this kind of ico .

Quote from: libert19 on January 25, 2019, 11:24:56 PM

or bounty hunters should choose projects where project is going to continue.

How do we know ? This is also impossible to do . bounty nowadays are more of a gambling game because the chance of scam are now higher .

Quote from: ?? on ??

u see pattern? https://pngscreen.com/gallery/ScreenShot_053JPG20.jpg

I cant open the file bro . can you re upload it so that i can check if what pattern you are talking about ?

Jrfranco

member

Activity: 786

Merit: 10

Quote from: bittraffic on January 01, 2019, 10:00:16 AM

If the team did a bounty campaign already for weeks and postponed the ICO after they see the bear market hasn't yet ended, do you think they are best to wait for the market to get better or just continue the ICO?

If they already have a working product, why not jsut continue the ICO after all, they just need few funds.
By the way Lyfe Project collected overwhelming funds in this bear market.

Here are list of projects that did it;

blackbox
WeiDEX
BXBET

I think they also claimed they do have a working product.

I am actively participating in some other bounty projects, and i encountered this case, after the bounty program they postponed the public ICO because as they said, the market condition is not favorable to do the selling of tokens,. i think its a good idea maybe, because they can protect themselves and also the funds from the investors i think.

Caladonian

hero member

Activity: 1302

Merit: 540

Quote from: libert19 on January 25, 2019, 11:24:56 PM

These ICOs should either start bounty campaigns after minimum funds are raised or bounty hunters should choose projects where project is going to continue.

Following you with your concept, it's best for the project to start bounty campaign when they already gained enough money to fund the project's development, this bounty will serve an additional promotions and give a little slice of allocated funds as any business needs to have advertisement
and promotions, good project won't cancel the process if they are certain that the development will continue and the usage will be huge to their
target market.

libert19

hero member

Activity: 2520

Merit: 952

These ICOs should either start bounty campaigns after minimum funds are raised or bounty hunters should choose projects where project is going to continue.

Pffrt

sr. member

Activity: 1372

Merit: 322

I think postponed is a good idea because the market is not so good and it may lead a good project to bad one. By the way, like as you said if they have a working product, I think it would be better to launch because some other ay come up with the same in the market.

Sarisang

sr. member

Activity: 784

Merit: 250

they expect the best results from the ICO. Learn and see many of the ICO are falling because of the crypto red seems to be a serious consideration for the team. Yet this is certainly also a disservice to the participants of the bounty as they will long enough get paid from the results of their work.

Muzika

sr. member

Activity: 980

Merit: 261

Quote from: bitcoin31 on January 25, 2019, 10:36:06 PM

So sad because you waste your time. After the bounty the ICO postponed maybe not continue.

If the ICO conduct a bounty campaign before their ICO starts and it will postponed during the public sale most likely the campaign will end to a scam project, because the most critical part of a campaign is during the public sale they should still conducting a campaign to introduce their product to the people.

Altero

full member

Activity: 784

Merit: 123

Quote from: nutildah on January 25, 2019, 10:36:19 PM

As bounty hunters you have very little if any power of the control of an ICO. Nobody really cares about your opinions because they realize you are just spambots that use human brains. Frankly I don't know why ICOs continue to use "bounty hunters" -- a far more glorious name for spamming a forum or social media than it deserves.

I'll do respect your opinion and hows you appreciate the way bounty hunters work for. Yes we can deny many of them didn't do their job well and so they tried to cheat the game just for the seek of having big rewards in the end but some of them are religiously did it.
Some postponement of ICO due to the market condition and they can't generate money for the support of their project. It sad it end up with nothing for the promoters and considered as a scam.

nutildah

legendary

Activity: 3010

Merit: 8114

As bounty hunters you have very little if any power of the control of an ICO. Nobody really cares about your opinions because they realize you are just spambots that use human brains. Frankly I don't know why ICOs continue to use "bounty hunters" -- a far more glorious name for spamming a forum or social media than it deserves.

bitcoin31

hero member

Activity: 1834

Merit: 523

So sad because you waste your time. After the bounty the ICO postponed maybe not continue.

CryptoTech_

full member

Activity: 994

Merit: 106

Official Street Team member

You need to add one more project, Buddy postponed the ICO after the Bounty was finished for a long time and until now there has been no clarity about the ICO, and investors have begun to lose confidence, can be seen from the telegram group whose members are getting smaller

marcbitcoins

full member

Activity: 854

Merit: 108

This is commonly happening now in this bearish market in which at first they expect much investments so that their project will be successfully implemented but if they failed to attract people to invest then they should extend it or postponed it as they need much money to pay the expenses of the project. To postponed is better than a scam project in which bounty hardworked is wasted.

pedpedped101

jr. member

Activity: 552

Merit: 1

I am sure that most of those projects did not plan well before starting. At least, that would have created enough awareness and investors would have been waiting for them to lunch.
Sometimes, it can be very painful, one just have to take it as one of those things.

GymClassHeroes

jr. member

Activity: 92

Merit: 1

If a project claims they were able to raise enough cash from ICO and were able to build a working product,I really do not see the need to keep investors waiting.First,no one can tell when the bear market will end,secondly,they already got the go ahead from investors who saw some good in their oroject and decided to invest

fathur01

full member

Activity: 700

Merit: 100

I think it is better to continue the ICO, as the market will fall even lower and everyone expects it, and if it falls even lower, then many will leave the crypto-currencies. And do not say that it will be on the contrary tempting offer to buy more, as the news background will also contribute to panic and sale!

bohboh

jr. member

Activity: 499

Merit: 1

I really don't think its a nice idea to end the ICO because of bear market, my opinion is that, if the project is real and they have good concept, people will definitely buy from their ico and its will definitely succeed during bear market.

papagravel

member

Activity: 490

Merit: 11

Quote from: bittraffic on January 01, 2019, 10:00:16 AM

If the team did a bounty campaign already for weeks and postponed the ICO after they see the bear market hasn't yet ended, do you think they are best to wait for the market to get better or just continue the ICO?

If they already have a working product, why not jsut continue the ICO after all, they just need few funds.
By the way Lyfe Project collected overwhelming funds in this bear market.

Here are list of projects that did it;

blackbox
WeiDEX
BXBET

I think they also claimed they do have a working product.

The developers see that many promising projects raise little money and they are afraid to carry out their ICO.
However, I am sure that if the project has a good working model and a good chance to bring profit to investors, then it will definitely collect the necessary investments.

yrrehc16

full member

Activity: 532

Merit: 101

It is alway on the team decision wether to continue and postponed the ICO.
But that is the big question also, even it is on the bear market why they need to postpone the ICO if they know that their project is good?
This makes me think that the ICO team are just into money in the market and not with the success of the project.

ArtemSergeevich

jr. member

Activity: 243

Merit: 2

I do not trust those projects that put off the ICO, as they had to prepare in advance for bad times and think through their development in a bear market. No one knows when it will end and we must act in reality.

cryptolove.143

newbie

Activity: 246

Merit: 0

You really can't blame the project that cancels their ICO during this bear market.

Topic: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign (Read 876 times)