Topic: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign - page 4. (Read 857 times)
Well, they probably tried to raise some money while bounty was active and they failed so they decided to postpone. Probably that ico never worth anything anytime.
In my opinion, if you do not doubt your product, there is no point in stopping ICO, you need to continue!
Why do they postpone the ICO? I think the bounty is the one that is dependent on the ICO? Well, the bounty should be the one to be postponed not the ICO itself as the ICO is the main project.
Since we don't really know what will happen to crypto coin in the future, i think continuing the ICO is way better than waiting until the condition getting better, because there will be no fix date when the market will be back again.
I think the team just afraid for jobs they have fallen since the bear market occurs. When indeed delayed I don't think this is a good result also to aim at the ICO. waiting for a bear market to a stop and then resume the ICO became the way that was done and despite giving the uncertainty but to save the project may be things anew. But if the team believes whatever he does they can compete and thrive I think there is no reason for the delay.
still continuing ico is the best way in my opinion. because some of the ico were finished in this bear market situation, they were seriously injured and many participants did not receive their tokens. What's worse, there are some who are scams. this will make the situation worse, it's better to continue the ico again and give an announcement that the end of ico is extended again. in addition to securing their value, but also to get additional funds.
I think the best decision is to participate in those bounties and hope that they would reach the soft cap, because it is an amazing opportunity of how to earn perspective tokens for low prices. Nowadays there are not so much hunters left.
I find that today there are not too many hunters as well, the projects given are not necessarily good, and many participants may have other ideas such as other people's scamming, I thought little but it could be good
This can become your another activity to spend your free time. There was a lot of reasons why dev postponed the ico.
I think waiting may be a better option. In fact, you will find that even if the ICO developer issues the token to the participant, the price of the token will not be worth the price. I think if all of us can form a Consensus does not sell tokens, and then wait until the arrival of the bull market, which will benefit everyone.
I don't agree with you on this. Why waiting? Do you know how long the bear market would last? If the price of Bitcoin does not return to $8k plus, does that means such a project will never be launched? If a project is really good, nothing stops its from continuing with its ICO irrespective of the market. You only need to sell a the prevailing market prices. That's all. Besides, there were ICOs even when Bitcoin was far less than the current price today. I think the best decision is to participate in those bounties and hope that they would reach the soft cap, because it is an amazing opportunity of how to earn perspective tokens for low prices. Nowadays there are not so much hunters left.
I find that today there are not too many hunters as well, the projects given are not necessarily good, and many participants may have other ideas such as other people's scamming, I thought little but it could be good
The alibis are always been the current market condition, I have been into at least 5 postponed ICO and many more ICO following the trend because they are having a hard time convincing investors that they have a good project the bounty hunters are the losers here.
I think the best decision is to participate in those bounties and hope that they would reach the soft cap, because it is an amazing opportunity of how to earn perspective tokens for low prices. Nowadays there are not so much hunters left.
I find that today there are not too many hunters as well, the projects given are not necessarily good, and many participants may have other ideas such as other people's scamming, I thought little but it could be good
I think the best decision is to participate in those bounties and hope that they would reach the soft cap, because it is an amazing opportunity of how to earn perspective tokens for low prices. Nowadays there are not so much hunters left.
I find that today there are not too many hunters as well, the projects given are not necessarily good, and many participants may have other ideas such as other people's scamming, I thought little but it could be good
if the market will be on the bearish or stable chart until a few years later, will they stop selling the ICO until that time? I don't think that's a reasonable choice. Because they don't know when the market is better. We may have to wait 10 years, 20 years or permanently. That is terrible for those who have invested
Most of the delayed projects have uncertainties, which may make investors too flustered, and investors may sell coins when the coins are listed. But a small number of projects are waiting for a better market, so this is still related to the quality of ICO.
If a project is solid and good and with a strong problem to solve in the future, and if such team believe in the future of blockchain and Cryptocurrency, they will go ahead to run the ICO in any type of market, they even stand to gain more when the bull run sets in. It's not all about Pump pump. There is more to project development than mooning.
Postponing might be a better idea, the ICO launching need to be on the right timing, when a positive trend is happening on the market it will attract more investors, if you force the launching then the result might be not good, and when the start is not good then it could affect the growth and the reputation
Postponing an ICO, that is, suspending it until better times in the cryptocurrency market, is not the best option. Investors and even bounty hunters usually begin to doubt such a project. In addition, many unscrupulous ICO teams deliberately suspend their ICOs in order not to pay bounty hunters in the future. Many suspended ICOs do not resume their activities at all. For example, I participated in the ICO VVTokens project, which conducted the ICO in the period from October 2017 to 01/05/2018. ICO was suspended, payment of tokens to bounty hunters was postponed until June 2018. And since then silence.Of course, the situation in each ICO project is different. In some cases, suspension is appropriate, in others - not.
I think the best decision is to participate in those bounties and hope that they would reach the soft cap, because it is an amazing opportunity of how to earn perspective tokens for low prices. Nowadays there are not so much hunters left.
I participated in the bounty Eloncity, Bounty ended in August 2018 but until now they still have not started public sale. They claimed to have mobilized 25 million private sale words, but public sale has not yet had a start date, quite questionable for such projects.
ICOS campaigns are taking place when there are unfavorable bear market conditions. Depending on the views of the campaign developers, if they have the financial potential they continue the campaigns but some campaigns without the potential they have to stop because the bad market does not attract investors.
In their place, if they only recently launched their ICO and collect money in cryptocurrency, then I would not suspend, since the market is now so low, and in six months of ICO (as they now usually last) they will be able to collect a good amount, even a very good one.
Jump to: