Topic: [PRE-ANN] [NILI] NILIcoins Art-coins (Read 7796 times)

Since the original URL links are broken, and the layout got out of order, I am posting this with restored links.

Well would you look at that, its not there anymore 

Saving Satoshi

The Safe Path To The Age Of Autonomous, Machine-Based Entities (AI and Synthetic Life)

https://medium.com/@NILIcoins/saving-satoshi-68b5fb56f12f

Lets begin with very simple concepts of Math and Physics (which you may skip if not your thing) , then zoom through the biology of life to conclude with the future of synthetic AI life and Satoshi’s identity rescue scheme .
Mathematics is all about transformation and construction in which the axioms act as the constituting laws. Numbers represents the purest form of logic in which all is recursive to a single term from which all is derived based on a primary function. The term is the number 2 (not 1), and the function is Division (Separation in its literal form) This then creates two equal parts, each is 1, which now constitutes order by creating 1 and another 1 that together constructs the 2 and then another 1 to create 3 and so forth for each successive number all the way to infinity.
Also physics, like math, presents sets of transformations laws, however in physics the transformation is of some ”thing” that is constructing another “thing”. That “some-thing” may be represented by a number, which is in actual the first act of transformation. To describe the “thing” that is being transformed into a number we may use different terms such as particle or energy, I prefer the general term “information”. Physics also introduces the idea of an apparatus, supposedly the region of observation, the technology through which the transformation, which in its purest formation we may think of as “observation”, occurs. Quantum mechanics already made us realize that an observation interferes with the transmission of information, yet it often neglects to realize it as a transformation. In fact there is no such thing as pure transmission. Anything that is being transmitted first interacts with the “observer” through the apparatus of the observation and then as it is constituted in the observer’s universe by being constructed using the observer’s medium expressions.
Transformations are also represented in biology, “life” is the general name we gave this transformation process. (which, from the living observer’s perspective, includes the decay process of death). In life, as we experience it being the living beings that we are, our senses act as the apparatus between the experience and its impression as rendered by our cell’s memory and eventually its expression as it is being processed by our brain. In this case “Impression” may be the best word to describe the experience in its lower level of expression while the term “expression” is reserved to describe the shared properties of the experience. My argument here is that our brain processes and then stores the shared experience of all living tissues that constitute our physical body in sort of a consensus based data processing and storage. In fact we may consider the functions of processing and storing of information as the actual functions resulting in transformation. We may then assert that the difference between a living system and a lifeless system is that the central processing and storage unit of a living system (the brain’s neurons and memory cells) are being controlled by all the parts that feed it with data. If you like, a living system is a decentralized ecosystem of the autonomous parts which compose it.
Now let’s move on to technology. We got Math and Physics by which we constructed the hardware of computers including the processing parts. We also got the software to interact with the machines and the web which enables the connection between us humans using the machines and between the different machines themselves. This network can now process information internally (compute) and distribute it to all its parts (nodes) which then communicate it to the world outside (us humans) . As humans, we also now have a part of our public self as virtual entities that live exclusively on the virtual universe which exists in the computers’ generated network. Such are all our username and digital interactions online. However, unlike our physical self, these digital extensions are not controlled or even owned by us. They all have one or several other physical humans that control them and own them. This centralized ownership in the metaverse of virtual identities is threatening to destroy the prospect of human life in the physical realm as well. Solving this is becoming central to the prospect of our future..
The good news is that it may turn out to be much simpler than we think and in large part have already been achieved before most people even realize the true danger of a metaverse controlled by centralized powers. Thanks to cryptography and the latest technologies which are making use of it, in particular the invention of Satoshi, a consensus generating a decentralized based transaction ledger (data processing and storage), we are well into this journey. By deploying some decentralized configurations for digital identity based on what has already been theorized (and started to be coded), we will soon witness an avalanche transforming life into the synthetic realm of machines.
And thus there was one last block needed to be curved to fit in like the center block in the arch. The block which holds it all in place forming the space within, preventing the structure from collapsing into a pile of rubble. This block is the one that will keep the machines from taking over and is what I have come to realize in full only about two weeks ago.
I don’t expect many or even a few to actually understand the problem, let alone the solution to the extent that it is, but I think most would be able to relate to it based on the movie “The matrix”, expressing the threat of man made machines with AI autonomous capabilities taking over the world. So here it is: Since identities will have to be admitted to the network by the consensus they may also be dismissed by the consensus. This may sounds so very basic and simplistic but is the essence of what should become an elaborate structure of decentralized governing in a decentralized Phygital universe of crypto based generated identities. .
Let’s break it down a bit. Assuming an open source based technology on which decentralized networks of computers are formed (like the bitcoin network) and such a network is running an identity configuration as part of its core code, this then means that each user is first an identity and then an asset holder. These identities, as forming, are attributed with voting power and weight based on a protocol of qualities and quantifiers that is defined approved and changed by the consensus., There are many different optional configurations for that (which we will see emerging in the next coming years), however, as different as they will be, all will have a configuration to admit users into the network , machines and humans alike. Ruled by the consensus, each network of users may admit a new user into the network according to a protocol that is governed by the network’s users. Each individual may choose to join any of the existing networks while networks may fork once even a single individual will choose to fork out and run a protocol with some changes put into it. Yet even if forked to a new network, this individual identity history and assets will still exist on that parent network and in fact will carry on to the forked version. However, a network of users will be able to protect itself by enabling the function of dismissing a user. The dismissing function itself is based on the admitting protocol in which each of the user’s keypair are derived from a root only he/she controls. however the public key of all the users sub identities are public. If the user becomes harmful to the network, these public keys can be dismissed, disabling the transaction and the private key to function in the network. The admitting process can enforce certain rules such as different proof of physical identifier by attestation provider and an identity management layer which allow the network to track down the root identity of each sub-identity. all at different levels of This scheme, if executed exclusively by humans at the identity management level of the key distribution (the second layer of the key hierarchy, as drafted by MDIP identity protocol for example) will prevent machines from taking over the system.
So what does that have to do with Satoshi? In fact very little other than the simple realization that the consensus can invent a Satoshi identity and attribute all of the Patoshi addresses to a Satoshi’s identity. Then the consensus can describe and agree to deny any transactions that pose an apparent risk and which can destabilize the bitcoin ecosystem. The consensus can define rules by which any of the funds in the Patoshi addresses can ever be spent, if at all. This almost redundant function of acknowledging Patoshi addresses as Satoshi’s asset by defining Patoshi as Satoshi will establish the genesis wallet as Satoshi’s virtual identity. This virtual being then gives an actual meaning to “we are all Satoshi , and thus free the creator of Satoshi, the person or group that started Bitcoin to walk away free from the risk their fortune holds, yet safe to claim the fame and appreciation for their huge contribution to humanity.

I  believe that some users have to ask for it. though its a shame that the moderators don't check it themselves. But these days its almost part of the work demonstrating how early in the history of NFT it came about and that even once declared as art and explained as such so many times its still was so new that people just didn't know how to react to it ( I guess the lawyers did understand LOL).

Why this forum has a warning label on it is beyond belief.

https://news.bitcoin.com/nilicoins-rare-pepe-and-curio-cards-a-look-at-the-og-collectibles-that-started-the-nft-madness/

2. Appropriation Art Transaction
We define the [ITWITTER] appropriation token as a chain of digital signatures starting at the minting of the first series issued as colored coin NFT by NILIcoin on Counterparty, utilizing the 2.0 protocol NFT innovations developed by Mastercoin (Omni) as open source code. Each Twitter account owner who holds an ITWITTET coin is entitled for a sub-asset NFT minted from the original ITWITTER issue address linking his @username to the original issued tokens. Though ITWITTER tokens do not have a serial number it is the purchase transaction’s timestamp that marks each token with its number by the order of purchasing. The sub-asset is minted after the purchase transaction is completed and is marked by the same number as the ITWITTER token purchase transaction. The order of action and transaction are as follow:
10K ITWITTER series NFT art tokens have been issued on Counterparty 9/28/2014 address #1 by NILIcoin which own the issuing address
10k ITWITTER tokens sent to address #2 controlled by the original issuing wallet.
Each whole unit of ITWITTER token gets its serial number defined by the timestamp of the purchase transaction.
A token owner holds the right for an issued sub-asset NFT of their @username from the ITWITTER original issuing address .
The order by which ITIWITTER tokens are purchased determine the serial number a sub-asset once minted

3. Timestamp Value
The solution we propose to the ITWITTER series NFT rare (unique) face (identity) value (life). begins with a timestamp . A timestamp works by taking a hash of each item’s issue transaction to be time stamped and published as the hash of the sent/receive transaction such as with Bitcoin’s coins. The timestamp proves the order of transactions and that the data must have existed at the time, obviously, in order to get into the hash. Each token transaction’s timestamp includes the previous timestamp in its hash, forming a serial number as a chain, with each additional timestamp reinforcing the order of each of the token’s original purchase transaction. It is thus the original purchase order executed that marks the token’s serial number and gives it it’s unique NFT identity and value.

4. Proof-of-@username
To implement a full appropriation activation of one’s own social network account username and tweets as assets on a peer-to-peer basis, we will need to use an existing blockchain, similar to Satoshi’s bitcoin data structure scheme, rather than the centrally controlled database. For our timestamp network, we implement the proof-of-@username by making some key data public, such that can be displayed and prove the user’s control over his/her account.. Once the proof effort has been expended to make it satisfy the proof-of-@username, the @username and serial number cannot be changed. As later @names are chained after it, the work to change or falsify the initial @username and serial number would include redoing all the blocks after it. The proof-of-@username also solves the problem of voting in decision making. If the majority were based on one-IP-address-one-vote, it could be subverted by anyone able to allocate many IPs. Proof-of-@username is essentially one-@username-one-vote. The majority decision is represented by the longest chain, which has the longest proof-of-@username invested in it. If a majority of @username voting power is controlled by attested users, the honest chain will grow its value the fastest and outpace any competing chains.

5. A Network Of Self-appropriated Social-assets.
The steps to form a decentralized network of existing assets must be initiated by users, each appropriating their own individual verified account on any of the social networks using the Golden Tweet model as self-appropriation act.
The Golden Tweet (or post) appropriation act is as follow:
Create or use a wallet on any blockchain .
Generate a new address.
Compose & Publish your Golden Tweet : — -@username — -public-key
Mint your Golden Tweet NFT
Send the minted NFT to yourself to the tweeted (published) public-key
Once appropriated, an account holder can claim all their activity as their assets and trade it using the wallet address to prove ownership and to receive payments. However the main benefit of the self appropriation act is to allow users to aggregate all their social activity on different networks, as reputation under a single address which they have the sole access and control over. This appropriation act carried out by many individuals on different social networks will form a new decentralized social network connecting all separated centralized social networks into one powerful decentralized meta network of blockchains.

6. A Guide to Own An Exclusive NILIcoins (2014) ITWITTER Based Sub-asset, Of your Appropriated Verified Own Twitter account
Create or use a Counterparty compatible wallet to generate a public-key
Compose & Publish your Golden Tweet: —@username —public-key , on your account.
Quote or reply to your Golden Tweet addressing @Itweetmenow.
Purchase ITWITTER using the public-key as the receive address.
Your Golden Tweet and the purchase transaction will be published by @Itweetmenow.
NILIcoins will mint your own Golden Tweet as a Sub-asset: ITWITTER.subasset# —@username —public-key

7. Conclusion
We have proposed the ability to tie one’s social asset created on a centralized social network to their real life entity using a decentralized payment enabled protocol, as the first step toward full appropriation of one’s own power of creation. While a decentralized act of appropriation deploys different decentralized networks of blockchains to store key data as the default solution to the ever growing power of social based corporate power, it also creates a meta decentralized network of identities which is directly governed by user’s power claimed back by choice.

Introduction
Social interaction on the Internet has come to rely almost exclusively on Social networks serving as trusted third parties to process (publish) social interaction. While the system works well enough for most transactions (tweets) it still suffers from the inherent weaknesses of the trust based model. Completely non-reversible (censored) transactions (tweet or post) are not really possible, since Social networks owners cannot avoid mediating disputes (can be charged by law). The social cost of such intervention increases the loss of trust in the system and the social costs for all participants., And there is a broader cost in the loss of ability to trust the officiancy given by the centralized corporate structure. These uncertainties could have been avoided using regulators appointed by users in a fully democratized network of votings but no such mechanism is in existence since required a fully integrated decentralized digital identity scheme. In this paper, we propose a solution to the problem of a centralized management of social networks using the appropriation methods of claiming one’s own created value. The system is secure as long as honesty and social values are the merits translated into monetary value such that each individual’s positive action increases the collective value of the network as a whole.

Account Appropriation Act (using Satoshi's own words)

https://medium.com/@NILIcoins/account-appropriation-act-5fcac92efb73


*ITWITTER is an art NFT created to be implemented as a social art piece.

Abstract
An appropriation of a social network account via tokenization would allow online entities to transfer an existing online social presence onto a decentralized monetary network in order to benefit directly one party from the other without going through a centralized incorporated entity. An online individual’s profile account in a leading social network provides part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if that third party which aggregates the value created by its users to increase company value without direct financial benefits to users, would be also required to move value around between users.(as would be the case of the intended Facebook’s Libra coin) . We propose a solution to the centralized nature of existing social network’s problems using an appropriation scheme to enable direct transfer of social value into monetary value . A coin linking one’s social network account to a monetary-value-exchange network (a wallet app) that would also run as a DAO on some blockchain, would be the ultimate solution. However enabling the transformation required an appropriation type of action to be taken by each of the individual’s participating in such an existing centralized social network (Twitter). The purpose of the Twitter Coin [ITWITTER) is to demonstrate that scheme executed as a social art piece initiated by myself @NILIcoins as the artist, and activated by a community of Twitter’s account holders who would invest in buying the coins and building the prototype for this future network.

Google is at my service right now. and It's a free ride, Actually you guys here on the thread are doing the work, shouldn't you get payed for it too? Well, buying my coins is like investing it the things you click on.

One friend send me the link .... I can say only this --------------> OMFG !!!!!!

The idea that you focused on promoting what your art may be worth one day is the main reason why you have already failed.
There is a line of working as an artist for a living and just trying to cash in.

Your future coins will only get you sued into nothingness.

hey,  look what I did found on google.... my own work that I thought was gone for ever since I have deleted my art from twitter as part of my art concept. So the twitter account is gone but not all my work.
http://twitpic.com/photos/nililerner?page=5

some of the photos  are part of an appropriation art ( which most of you here have to google to find out that it is an art form) project. my Coca-Cola coin and other brand coins projects falls under this category of art