Topic: [PRE-ANN] OPAIR | Decentralized Debit Cards | OCaml | New Blockchain Platform - page 95. (Read 127674 times)

The rocket has not yet launched but so much negativity & FUD already spreading and ICO is still in its 1st week. And dev is putting more flame to the fire by making such statement.


This is typically an exit statement for a scam blaming a few people that they killed the project by spreading false rumors or accusation of scam. A few people cannot take down a big project if its an honest, trusted and offers innovation. So all dev has do is to rebutt the false accusations and prove the project is intent in delivering its promises.

The success of a project is partly delivered by development team but more importantly, the investors willing to gamble their precious BTC on unknown devs promising lots of things, who they will never meet or have heard of previously.

hi devs,

1. When will the coins be distributed to the investors and be ready to go on exchanges?
2. I didn't get what's new about this project and what makes it unique compare to other projects that look the same.. ?

tnx

I completely agree. Escrow is actually in the best interest of Opair provided that it's not a scam.

I am waiting for my invitation to Slack. Hopefully, the investors who are interested can discuss in peace without constant FUD.

Massive amount of investment here.

Members: 217
Number of investments: 104
Amount invested: 61.32 BTC

Actual bonus (until August 3): - Users participating in the campaign the first week (but not the first two days) will receive 20% bonus.

I didn't ask him any question, aside from obvious rhetorical questions. I didn't request a comment. I just stated my opinion. I didn't feel ignored at all, in fact, I just joined Slack and was welcomed immediately. He's the one who sent me the invite. There is no reason for he and I to chat here now. We can use Slack.

I did not ignore him, I agree with him on almost every point he says. But we have said today that the we are already discussing about the escrow. We will not be repeating the same every hour.

See how he ignores you Perry? How can you trust such dev to actually not scam your money with all the attitude he shows.
completely close minded one. one day he'll realize people will always need people.

wow this is a super fud fest lol there has been ico before where real life identity was not given.

Yes we should be mature enough to respond to inquiries to investors. This dev don't even respond correctly. how can you expect this coin to go far?
its not the platform transparency we are looking, its the transparency of the team, who they are.  We wanna know who you the Opair are. if you can't provide such info, then they are bound to scam!

Fixed, its [email protected]

OPER?  Is that the next ICO project?

I would like all users interested in the project come to our Slack to have a more fluid conversation.
Send an email to [email protected] to request an invitation.

Regards

You're doing fine so far, already 76 BTC invested. Maybe just do what BRK devs did and ignore the FUD. It's not going to stop if you add escrow. It's not going to stop if you reveal everything about yourselves. I agree, 40k is about enough for 2 months of work, could easily burn through it in a week tbh.

The reality is that there are a lot of ignorant people that think they know how things "should" be done, but they forget about all of the times that people "got scammed" by ICOs using escrow and revealing their identities. Legal action is rarely successful. Escrow might make some people comfortable but consider a lot of those people weren't going to invest anyways. Escrow releases funds with minimal requirements so there's no real benefit to using it. Not by the definition of "scam" that passes around here, anyways.

If your coin enters the market at below "X" it's a scam. If your coin goes down in value it's a scam. If the dev needs to sleep or eat then it's a scam. If you don't update the thread every day with progress, it's a scam. No matter what, they find some reason to accuse you of scamming.


I'm not saying Opair is or isn't a scam. I'm saying that people will think it's a scam no matter what you do. You can't please everyone, ever.


But, if you really want to make that 700 BTC mark. Contact SebastianJu and figure it out. Escrow will make more people invest more. There is no real downfall to using it if you're running a legitimate project that plans to go the full course, even if you're not. A good scam can make it past escrow, lol. Look at the projects you yourself have compared this to. They used escrow. They raised the amount you want to raise. You have to see the correlation there. Also, don't be scared of threats from these fools. Most wouldn't leave their house to do something if you were tied up and left on their lawn. Ignore the FUD. Listen to investors. Work with us.

It's definitely strange that an accomplished developer has no commits or sources. Simply by Googling my username you can find me and I haven't worked for any major companies. I'm an amateur developer with less than 4 years of experience but I'm easily found. Why isn't a full stack dev with 20+ years? My partner is a full stack dev and has an extremely common name and can still be found easily.  That's how you get venture capital level funding.  Transparency.

If you don't raise 700+ BTC with this project at this price per coin then it will be entirely because of your lack of transparency and refusal to use escrow. Blaming FUD is sad.

Go look at WAVES/LISK/RISE threads and tell me how it prevented them. Look at the situation with ETH. How much did they raise again? Lots of FUD in their thread too. You only have yourself to blame, as the marketing coordinator.



+1. I agreed with everything you said but didn't want to make the post so long... it's already long enough. lol

This community needs to mature. You are throwing it all away. Let this team work. If they can not meet his promises or run away, then all of us we made a legal action or whatever, but doing this now we gain nothing. This situation is sick.

Really i dont understand anything about this makes no sense. Are you really investors?

I wanna said this again:

"I will speak as the investor of this project that I am. As several users have noted above there are points that would have been better if they were different (such as using escrow) but as he said wasserman99 everything was clarified and public before the ICO, which there is no complaint possible. That was the Opair proposal and I decided to invest equally like others, even knowing these points because I was attracted by the proposed project. I'm glad to invest here and I'm sure this project will go far. We are already adults and before investing our own money we must do due diligence about that points. So now please stop with the drama. If you want to invest, do it, or not it's your own decision.
Please take a look at the ICO platform, it is the most transparent i saw in this forum. You can see at any time all statistics, including your balance and price per coin, which is updated as more people invest. Everything run smoothly. For suspicious people, make yourselves an account on the platform and try it on your own. That's a great test of experience and knowledge of this team. If the final release has much quality as the platform it will be a success. If they could do that without money, with the money raise from the ICO the sky is the limit.

Moreover, if any user wants to do drama/fud/etc you can create your own thread. Here it is to discuss Opair and its evolution, not on issues that were already cleared a thousand times. If you do not like the rules that they put, dont invest, END. SIMPLY LIKE THAT! but i do not want that investment i ve made in this project, which was big, it is affected by fools users who can not read a few simple rules. Each is responsible for where you decide to invest and, before doing so, they must perform due diligence, which is in this case they didnt. NOOBS!

In short, I am more affected by the actions of these fools users than the dev, since neither has completed the ICO, which we can not know if they will achieve fulfill everything they have promised."

i didn't say 40K USD is enough for the coin to fly. I say 40k USD is enough for you to fly and abandon the project.
40K USD is huge enough for scammers actually. most of them are more than willing get a red trust with just 20USD but you just can't get enough do you?

Ok, that's it. I'm out of the sig campaign.

Look guys, I still don't think this is a scam, but you have very bad ways of communication.
Blaming the people on this forum for your shortcomings in that area is the last straw for me.

Good luck to you and your investors.

it is illogical that ppl asked your for more proofs but you are stick with yourself, decline our requests. We are investors, we have the right to the real situation.

You should publish them unless you don't wanna more btc any more.  It means you are ready to run away!

Here we are and here we will stay. It seems that you want me to go to believe theat you were right. It's sick.
40kUSD is enough. It is noted that you know nothing about these businesses. With this budget, little can be achieved in a project of these characteristics.


And i'm not saying that is the fault of investors. I say there is a user group that is campaigning against us. That weakens the project, which affects our goal. Then, if we cant reach our goal, we can not finish everything that we promised. Not because we have escaped or we were incompetent, but because a few users who can not read some rules before investing attack us.

40kUSD is enough. He is just fooling around this time. he is now starting to change his names online and tracks
I think he is about to run now.



He just changed his tracks, he is about to go fully unknown. say good bye to your btcs