Yes Arsenal was more of defensive because they can't play an attacking football with Manchester City because that would have cost them the game since City has more possession of the ball, one important thing i noticed about Arsenal in the game is that they allowed City to have more control of the ball but they kept them away from their post because City did not have the opportunity to shoot shots like they used to do when they play against other teams. The game wasn't that boring just that most people expected to see goals in the match but when they were not seeing goal attempts they became angry watching the game.
Even if 3 points cannot be secured in this match but at least one point is very good when facing Manchester City at the Etihad stadium.
Conversely, this actually makes Manchester City get a loss because after all, with their conditions that should allow them to be at the top comfortably, it must be disturbed by 2 results against Arsenal and Liverpool but even so at this time the chance is still there but depending on the performance of Manchester City as well whether they can or not and of course the performance of 2 other clubs, Arsenal and Liverpool, which must be glimpsed because the change of position depends on the final results for the rest of the season.