Author

Topic: Premier League Prediction Thread 2021/2022 - page 650. (Read 774782 times)

sr. member
Activity: 784
Merit: 306
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
But Chelsea's transfer business so far has been an absolute joke. It's the third season of them trying to buy a shit ton of players who are not even proven. If they spent money by buying PL-proven players, it would have been understandable, but their business model is very confusing. They are giving players 8-9-year contracts for financial rules, but how is that a proper business? Chelsea is in shambles.

We will continue to see huge transfers from the Chelsea team and I don’t know how well they can be managed well by them to produce maximum result. This is surely business and not sports. I am not sure if during Abramovich days, Chelsea has this much number of players even though I know he also signed many. They should and be making a point out of this signings and that should be the results of their performance in the league to speak for them.

And don't be surprised if in the future there will be many Chelsea players who are thrown away again, loaned and even choose to take offers from other clubs. With a squad of more than 40, who wants to share a seat in a full season? Enzo Maresca will not even be able to manage that many players to find the ideal format. Chelsea this season embarrassed themselves especially in a competition as big as the EPL where player consistency is the key to survival. I don't like this kind of recruitment, and any club that is still rational will think 10x to buy players whose quality is not at all above standard.

You should know that Chelsea are keeping a bunch of this players for business and not all necessary to play in the league. You can’t have a squad as big as that and be able to make right decisions for players to play in the field. Even at that, you have to narrow down your interest on some set of players and focus more on them because only will that you can achieve result in a competition as hefty as the premier league. The premier league is a game for the most strategist and you can’t be one with this large number of players.
full member
Activity: 490
Merit: 209
And don't be surprised if in the future there will be many Chelsea players who are thrown away again, loaned and even choose to take offers from other clubs. With a squad of more than 40, who wants to share a seat in a full season? Enzo Maresca will not even be able to manage that many players to find the ideal format. Chelsea this season embarrassed themselves especially in a competition as big as the EPL where player consistency is the key to survival. I don't like this kind of recruitment, and any club that is still rational will think 10x to buy players whose quality is not at all above standard.

Chelsea problem are a easy one to solve but they are not even prepared to solve their own problems because they think sacking and buying players is the solution to their problems, but it's not so, they need to reduce the amount of players they have and keep the once they feel can player very well but just need a little bit of sharpening but no they will rather want to buy, I wonder if they even have enough space in their dressing room. When players are even to much managing will be one of the problems because their will be a lot of confusion when you want to select the good players so I will suggest they sell some or grant some out for loan to get enough space to select the best players they have now.  We all know how the premier league usually turns out, having such a problem to deal with now will make evey decision they make now to be hasty and it will make the club not to be balance, Chelsea performance will still be wack this period am very sure, even their fans are already getting tired of the whole problems they are creating and they can not solve.
hero member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 504
The fierce competition between these two teams will make the EPL even more interesting, especially since several other teams such as Liverpool, Chelsea and Manchester United are able to provide surprises this season. Arsenal are very eager to win the EPL trophy because in the last two seasons they have always failed to compete with Manchester City, Arsenal transfer activity is also quite good, Arteta has succeeded in convincing several quality players to join his squad. Arsenal are on the rise after spending big in the summer transfer market, they need to maintain their best performance from the start of the season until the end if they want to win the EPL trophy from Manchester City.
Everyone will see how Arsenal runs this season from start to finish with the current squad, because Arteta is also still trying to improve Arsenal's performance and be able to surpass Manchester City's strength in the season that will start soon. However, several other teams also need to be watched out for as you said because Liverpool, Chelsea, and Manchester United will not remain silent this season so they will also find ways to be able to block Manchester City and Arsenal when the season starts later.
I believe more in Liverpool who will make it difficult for Arsenal and Manchester City in the title hunt because I see Arne Slot's troops looking tougher to face this season and the coach has also prepared in such a way even though Liverpool has not made a transfer yet but there are already several names that have been linked we are just waiting for Liverpool's decision to recruit several names that are certainly still a threat to other top clubs, for Chelsea and Manchester United I am not sure they can block Manchester City or Arsenal I think their performance is still uncertain.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 617
not your keys not your coins


Pedro Neto is definitely young and exciting. But I honestly think he is over hyped. He is 24 years old, but as exciting as he is, he is not bringing in good enough results which he should be in my opinion. Now I understand that he might play on the winger position, but even after that, for a forward player to have only two goals in 20 matches is just not good enough. It?s like he is the budget version of Antony Cheesy. I know that goals are not the only contribution that a player can do for his team, but I still think he should score more.

At the same time, the argument is completely trance on its head when we look at the number of assists that he has made. Suddenly it doesn?t look like he is a bad player or as bad as someone might think him to be. Emm, nine assists and two goals in 20 matches is not bad for a 24 year-old, isn't it?

All I am trying to say is it is good that Chelsea have brought him in. But they should not trust him too much at the start. Give him chances and see how he does.

Sometimes I think, the money Todd Boehly has spent for injury pron Pedro & Kiernan Frank, if it was spent on Victor Osimen or at least buying a good goalkeeper, both or one of them would have improved the squad.

In my humble opinion he needs to take care of the disciplinary aspect a little better, judging from the few games he has played he has a really high number of yellow cards.
I like the male game of football, but if you get a lot of yellow cards you risk putting the team in trouble and a professional doesn't do that.
Otherwise absolutely true, it seems promising.
hero member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 702
I would like to see Gallagher to stay in Chelsea than moving and Joao Felix appears to replace Gallagher. Joao Felix after a big transfer to Atletico Madrid, several seasons there and some loan transfers, so far has failed to show his ability at world class level. Premier League is a tough league where there are many physical fights that are not matched with physical strength of Joao Felix.

Joao Felix has its own great skills and potential and he has so far shown what he’s capable of doing since he’s been playing for many clubs in his international career. He has done better in his last club he played for on loan but maybe his best was not good enough and the club looked out for other options they so much believe and have hope in. Joao Felix game during his time at Chelsea was average and it was when this team was very poor, maybe when he comes back, he’ll show something different but as it is now, nothing is certain yet.

Let's see how the Osimhen rumors develop from now because the official season will start soon and we also need to see how much Chelsea wants to bring this player to the Premier League. In addition, Osimhen is also being targeted by other teams so Chelsea must be able to handle this more quickly and if Chelsea are very willing to let Lukaku go to another team like Napoli, I think it will look more like a player swap between Lukaku and Osimhen for both teams.

That’s exactly what have been speculating about Chelsea and Napoli, a swap deal is imminent if the deal is going to work out between this two teams. Napoli are not in search of any other striker asides Lukaku, Osimehn been their main striker has not also left the club and offers from other clubs were rejected. I think they don’t want to lose him to another team and pay high price in bringing Lukaku into the team, so they’ll definitely prefer a swap deal in order for this deal to work out. Osimehn should be seen more likely in Chelsea than any other club by next season if at all Lukaku will be coming to Napoli next season.
hero member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 675
I still want to understand how Arsenal football club thought it made business sense to extend Nketiah’s contract on a 100k/week Now many clubs that are interested in signing the striker cannot meet the wages demands of the players couple with the club asking transfer fee.

Honestly to think Arsenal renewed his contract and offered him 100k/week is madness. And when it’s called out, you’ll hear people say it’s to preserve his market value. How do you preserve the market value of an asset that is not wanted yet continues to depreciate?

I recently checked Ivan Toney’s salary. The dude earns barely £36k/week. How does anyone think giving Nketiah and Nelson £100k/week is reasonable.

It’s a questionable transaction by Edu, the director of football to be very honest. It’ll be very hard to find potential buyers that would agree to meet his wages and also the asking fee of his club.
sr. member
Activity: 840
Merit: 377
Chelsea are a joke to be honest, why sell Gallagher, he’s one of their better players.
What’s the plan, sell Gallagher and bring in another random guy nobody has heard of who goes on to flop hard.
Feels like they have no clue what they are doing, just signing players like a kid playing a computer game.
After Chelsea's ownership transferred to Boehly, I felt that the actions that Chelsea always took did not make sense. Starting from changing coaches almost every season and also selling players who have excellent performance. So if it continues like this, I'm sure Chelsea will not experience significant progress, even though currently Chelsea seems to have a lot of money and is buying a lot of other players. However, as you said, if the players Chelsea buy are not of good quality it will certainly be a waste for Chelsea even though the players are expensive. The reason is that currently Chelsea has bought 8 new players to their squad. I also don't understand what Chelsea will do with that many players, because currently Chelsea already has more than 40 players in their squad.

Apart from that, talking about Gallagher, who is reportedly going to be sold by Chelsea in this transfer market, I am also confused about why Chelsea wants to sell him. However, as we know, Gallagher's performance at Chelsea was very good so it would be better for Chelsea not to sell the player. However, from the news that I know, the reason Chelsea will sell Gallagher is said to be because the squad that Chelsea has is very large. Therefore, Chelsea will sell Gallagher in this transfer market. However, in my opinion, this reason is not strong enough to sell Gallagher. Because if it is true that the reason is because there are too many Chelsea players, Chelsea should only sell players who are more worthy of being sold, and not sell Gallagher who has good performance. So in essence I also really don't understand the situation that is happening at Chelsea at the moment.

Even though I think the sale of Gallagher is a bit pointless, I'd like to also state that not every coach finds every player to be good. From our perspective, Gallagher was good, but that was under Pochettino. Maresca's style of play probably does not suit Gallagher and vice versa.

But Chelsea's transfer business so far has been an absolute joke. It's the third season of them trying to buy a shit ton of players who are not even proven. If they spent money by buying PL-proven players, it would have been understandable, but their business model is very confusing. They are giving players 8-9-year contracts for financial rules, but how is that a proper business? Chelsea is in shambles.
Gallagher wasn't sold because his playing pattern wasn't suitable to that of Enzo Maresca. Chelsea needed to balance the financial fair play book and Chelsea needed to sell one other home grown players, and Gallagher was the only player suitable for them to sell and realize a reasonable amount of money. So there wasn't any reason to offer him another new contract. Gallagher is a fine player that can fit into this Chelsea team. He has been playing in the premier league for long now and has the required experience so why can't he fit in. Chelsea fans love him, and has been dedicated to his game and club. If Enzo Maresca had his way, he would have preferred to keep Gallagher than buying Dewsbury Hall from Leicester City. Does it make any sense for a club to sell their best Midfielder for the past two seasons now.
This is the big question mark at the moment, why Chelsea decided to sell Gallagher, who has an important role in their midfield. Although it is true that a coach has his own standards regarding the players he wants to choose. But if the situation is like this, I think it's a bit unreasonable. Because selling core players and bringing in new players is clearly a slightly less good action. Because new players do not necessarily have as good a performance as the core players who have been with the team for a long time. So in my opinion Maresca and Chelsea have gone too far in rotating or replacing their current players. Because in my opinion, if Chelsea really wants to make their team even better, of course they have to do it slowly. So it doesn't need to be done all at once like now, because if it fails, the losses will definitely be quite large. But it can't be helped, Chelsea and Maresca were the ones who had an important role in this action. So we'll see what will happen to Chelsea next season. Will the situation get better or worse? I pray that Chelsea can compete more fiercely next season. Because I'm a little bored seeing Manchester City and Arsenal competing fiercely in the Premier League. So hopefully Maresca can really turn Chelsea into a great team again, even though his current actions have a few pro and contra.
hero member
Activity: 1302
Merit: 508
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
But Chelsea's transfer business so far has been an absolute joke. It's the third season of them trying to buy a shit ton of players who are not even proven. If they spent money by buying PL-proven players, it would have been understandable, but their business model is very confusing. They are giving players 8-9-year contracts for financial rules, but how is that a proper business? Chelsea is in shambles.
And don't be surprised if in the future there will be many Chelsea players who are thrown away again, loaned and even choose to take offers from other clubs. With a squad of more than 40, who wants to share a seat in a full season? Enzo Maresca will not even be able to manage that many players to find the ideal format. Chelsea this season embarrassed themselves especially in a competition as big as the EPL where player consistency is the key to survival. I don't like this kind of recruitment, and any club that is still rational will think 10x to buy players whose quality is not at all above standard.
The way the Chelsea club moves in the transfer market is quite confusing. They seem to collect every young player they consider to have potential. but yes, most of them don't have the experience that can be used as a reference that they are truly potential players. They are like betting on the transfer market. Maybe they hope to find hidden gems from the many young players. I personally don't have a problem with the way they gather young players. It's just that the problem is that too many players are brought in in each transfer window. Because this doesn't just happen this season but this has happened since last season too.
I think Chelsea's intention to buy players may come from owner Todd Boehly. Chelsea still knows how to make the whole world talk about them. In recent days, they have "covered" the European football summer transfer market with a series of completed transfer information. Fans will be 'stunned' to see Chelsea's transfer deals under Todd Boehly. Owner Todd Boehly has too much money or he is clueless about managing player recruitment.

I think buying players with potential at a very young age, Signing long-term contracts to reduce their real value, and selling players who are no longer in their plans for good prices is exactly what Chelsea is doing. Buying but not necessarily using immediately, Chelsea will certainly send many players on loan across Europe like a few years ago before "calling back" experienced players. Is this how billionaire Todd Boehly makes his money?
hero member
Activity: 2114
Merit: 740
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
~Snip~
And don't be surprised if in the future there will be many Chelsea players who are thrown away again, loaned and even choose to take offers from other clubs. With a squad of more than 40, who wants to share a seat in a full season? Enzo Maresca will not even be able to manage that many players to find the ideal format. Chelsea this season embarrassed themselves especially in a competition as big as the EPL where player consistency is the key to survival. I don't like this kind of recruitment, and any club that is still rational will think 10x to buy players whose quality is not at all above standard.
It is certain, all of these players cannot be registered because it is against the rules. Selling or lending to other clubs is the best option to reduce the burden of the club to pay their salaries. If the player is left alone, it will be very detrimental to Chelsea because their selling value will decrease due to not getting playing time. Enzo Maresca has the choice in determining which players will be registered and included in the starting eleven, he also has assistants and several other staff who are ready to support him in choosing suitable players. Chelsea need to move quickly to cut the quota of players they currently have, the players need to be loaned to other clubs, then sold if their performance is able to attract the interest of other clubs.
hero member
Activity: 2156
Merit: 521


This weekend the EPL will roll again and start the 24/25 season, of course it will be highly anticipated with many surprises that occur in each match that should not be missed. The opening match on Saturday presents several fierce matches and among them many fans of these teams want to immediately see the performance of their favorite team.

Maybe from some of these matches that interests me is Manchester United who are once again challenged to prove their ability to face Fulham and at the same time answer the doubts that are often big questions for everyone. In addition, for Liverpool and Arsenal there is no need to question it anymore because they will definitely collect 3 full points.

One thing that is certain and should not be missed is the last match where West Ham vs Aston Villa considering that these two teams can show an exciting match. We know that West Ham with a major overhaul wants to prove that they want to compete again at the top and Aston Villa as a surprising team last season with Unai Emery is charged to be able to show their class again.

It would be a shame not to bet on this game, I will start with Manchester United, Liverpool, Arsenal and both teams to score for West Ham and Aston Villa on the betting slip. Hopefully this is a good start. Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 980
Merit: 451
Wheel of Whales 🐳
But Chelsea's transfer business so far has been an absolute joke. It's the third season of them trying to buy a shit ton of players who are not even proven. If they spent money by buying PL-proven players, it would have been understandable, but their business model is very confusing. They are giving players 8-9-year contracts for financial rules, but how is that a proper business? Chelsea is in shambles.
And don't be surprised if in the future there will be many Chelsea players who are thrown away again, loaned and even choose to take offers from other clubs. With a squad of more than 40, who wants to share a seat in a full season? Enzo Maresca will not even be able to manage that many players to find the ideal format. Chelsea this season embarrassed themselves especially in a competition as big as the EPL where player consistency is the key to survival. I don't like this kind of recruitment, and any club that is still rational will think 10x to buy players whose quality is not at all above standard.
The way the Chelsea club moves in the transfer market is quite confusing. They seem to collect every young player they consider to have potential. but yes, most of them don't have the experience that can be used as a reference that they are truly potential players. They are like betting on the transfer market. Maybe they hope to find hidden gems from the many young players. I personally don't have a problem with the way they gather young players. It's just that the problem is that too many players are brought in in each transfer window. Because this doesn't just happen this season but this has happened since last season too.
hero member
Activity: 1974
Merit: 586
Free Crypto Faucet in Trustdice
~~

Who cares? These players are much aware that they can not secure a place to play in the first eleven but yet, they choose to agree and signed. They're probably comfortable sitting on the bench or playing two to three minutes during extra time as far they'll receive their payment at appropriate time. What Chelsea is doing is not recruitment, it is an abuse of the process.
Well this will be a disaster of their own actions, Chelsea must accept the fact that next season will be so difficult because they themselves made it difficult. It is not easy for the coach to filter from the many players to be registered as the main squad that will undergo a long season. Regardless of what Chelsea does, there is still a positive point, namely that they will not be short of players if one is injured, there are still many options that can be taken. Even Enzo Maresca can rotate every time he plays 1 match. For example, 1 match for squad A, and the next match will be played by squad B and so on. What is clear is that I don't care if Chelsea plays badly because this club has lost its vision and mission as an influential club in the Premier League.
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1089
Goodnight, o_e_l_e_o 🌹
And don't be surprised if in the future there will be many Chelsea players who are thrown away again, loaned and even choose to take offers from other clubs. With a squad of more than 40, who wants to share a seat in a full season? Enzo Maresca will not even be able to manage that many players to find the ideal format. Chelsea this season embarrassed themselves especially in a competition as big as the EPL where player consistency is the key to survival. I don't like this kind of recruitment, and any club that is still rational will think 10x to buy players whose quality is not at all above standard.
Without being told, it looks like Todd wants to do business with Chelsea rather than win trophies. Maybe he believes that if he buys a player for $10m and features the players in few matches and the player performs well, he can be able to sell the player for $15 to $20M. Maybe they are applying the mentality of Arsenal of Arsene Wenger.

It is too early to draw conclusions about Maresca's work, but I don't really like what I see either, they spend a lot of money on transfers, but it is difficult to understand whether they need so many players. In friendly games, the team also looks chaotic, there is no integrity, but it is difficult to evaluate the team in such games, this may be a mistaken opinion. Chelsea have been through this several times with different coaches, they buy new players and after an unsuccessful season they look for a new coach, but for some reason their choice stops at young coaches, often without the necessary experience and want to get an instant result.
Chelsea is not playing any major European trophy like CL or Europa. So, they do not even need the numerous players for now until  they return to European football as mentioned above and not conference league.
sr. member
Activity: 798
Merit: 364
Even though I think the sale of Gallagher is a bit pointless, I'd like to also state that not every coach finds every player to be good. From our perspective, Gallagher was good, but that was under Pochettino. Maresca's style of play probably does not suit Gallagher and vice versa.

But Chelsea's transfer business so far has been an absolute joke. It's the third season of them trying to buy a shit ton of players who are not even proven. If they spent money by buying PL-proven players, it would have been understandable, but their business model is very confusing. They are giving players 8-9-year contracts for financial rules, but how is that a proper business? Chelsea is in shambles.

What do you expect when you have people who are not interested in sport as the one leading the club? Absolutely, things like this will occur. Chelsea is not only in shambles, it's sad seeing them destroying the reputation that Abrahamovic had built over the past years and turn the club to a laughing stuck. There is nothing wrong if they choose to run a business with the club but it should be reasonable and fruitful, not baseless one.

And don't be surprised if in the future there will be many Chelsea players who are thrown away again, loaned and even choose to take offers from other clubs. With a squad of more than 40, who wants to share a seat in a full season? Enzo Maresca will not even be able to manage that many players to find the ideal format. Chelsea this season embarrassed themselves especially in a competition as big as the EPL where player consistency is the key to survival. I don't like this kind of recruitment, and any club that is still rational will think 10x to buy players whose quality is not at all above standard.

Who cares? These players are much aware that they can not secure a place to play in the first eleven but yet, they choose to agree and signed. They're probably comfortable sitting on the bench or playing two to three minutes during extra time as far they'll receive their payment at appropriate time. What Chelsea is doing is not recruitment, it is an abuse of the process.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 351
Chelsea are a joke to be honest, why sell Gallagher, he’s one of their better players.
What’s the plan, sell Gallagher and bring in another random guy nobody has heard of who goes on to flop hard.
Feels like they have no clue what they are doing, just signing players like a kid playing a computer game.
After Chelsea's ownership transferred to Boehly, I felt that the actions that Chelsea always took did not make sense. Starting from changing coaches almost every season and also selling players who have excellent performance. So if it continues like this, I'm sure Chelsea will not experience significant progress, even though currently Chelsea seems to have a lot of money and is buying a lot of other players. However, as you said, if the players Chelsea buy are not of good quality it will certainly be a waste for Chelsea even though the players are expensive. The reason is that currently Chelsea has bought 8 new players to their squad. I also don't understand what Chelsea will do with that many players, because currently Chelsea already has more than 40 players in their squad.

Apart from that, talking about Gallagher, who is reportedly going to be sold by Chelsea in this transfer market, I am also confused about why Chelsea wants to sell him. However, as we know, Gallagher's performance at Chelsea was very good so it would be better for Chelsea not to sell the player. However, from the news that I know, the reason Chelsea will sell Gallagher is said to be because the squad that Chelsea has is very large. Therefore, Chelsea will sell Gallagher in this transfer market. However, in my opinion, this reason is not strong enough to sell Gallagher. Because if it is true that the reason is because there are too many Chelsea players, Chelsea should only sell players who are more worthy of being sold, and not sell Gallagher who has good performance. So in essence I also really don't understand the situation that is happening at Chelsea at the moment.

Even though I think the sale of Gallagher is a bit pointless, I'd like to also state that not every coach finds every player to be good. From our perspective, Gallagher was good, but that was under Pochettino. Maresca's style of play probably does not suit Gallagher and vice versa.

But Chelsea's transfer business so far has been an absolute joke. It's the third season of them trying to buy a shit ton of players who are not even proven. If they spent money by buying PL-proven players, it would have been understandable, but their business model is very confusing. They are giving players 8-9-year contracts for financial rules, but how is that a proper business? Chelsea is in shambles.
Gallagher wasn't sold because his playing pattern wasn't suitable to that of Enzo Maresca. Chelsea needed to balance the financial fair play book and Chelsea needed to sell one other home grown players, and Gallagher was the only player suitable for them to sell and realize a reasonable amount of money. So there wasn't any reason to offer him another new contract. Gallagher is a fine player that can fit into this Chelsea team. He has been playing in the premier league for long now and has the required experience so why can't he fit in. Chelsea fans love him, and has been dedicated to his game and club. If Enzo Maresca had his way, he would have preferred to keep Gallagher than buying Dewsbury Hall from Leicester City. Does it make any sense for a club to sell their best Midfielder for the past two seasons now.
sr. member
Activity: 504
Merit: 433
And don't be surprised if in the future there will be many Chelsea players who are thrown away again, loaned and even choose to take offers from other clubs. With a squad of more than 40, who wants to share a seat in a full season? Enzo Maresca will not even be able to manage that many players to find the ideal format. Chelsea this season embarrassed themselves especially in a competition as big as the EPL where player consistency is the key to survival. I don't like this kind of recruitment, and any club that is still rational will think 10x to buy players whose quality is not at all above standard.
It is too early to draw conclusions about Maresca's work, but I don't really like what I see either, they spend a lot of money on transfers, but it is difficult to understand whether they need so many players. In friendly games, the team also looks chaotic, there is no integrity, but it is difficult to evaluate the team in such games, this may be a mistaken opinion. Chelsea have been through this several times with different coaches, they buy new players and after an unsuccessful season they look for a new coach, but for some reason their choice stops at young coaches, often without the necessary experience and want to get an instant result.
sr. member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 486
But Chelsea's transfer business so far has been an absolute joke. It's the third season of them trying to buy a shit ton of players who are not even proven. If they spent money by buying PL-proven players, it would have been understandable, but their business model is very confusing. They are giving players 8-9-year contracts for financial rules, but how is that a proper business? Chelsea is in shambles.
And don't be surprised if in the future there will be many Chelsea players who are thrown away again, loaned and even choose to take offers from other clubs. With a squad of more than 40, who wants to share a seat in a full season? Enzo Maresca will not even be able to manage that many players to find the ideal format. Chelsea this season embarrassed themselves especially in a competition as big as the EPL where player consistency is the key to survival. I don't like this kind of recruitment, and any club that is still rational will think 10x to buy players whose quality is not at all above standard.
sr. member
Activity: 2842
Merit: 326
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
Let's see how the Osimhen rumors develop from now because the official season will start soon and we also need to see how much Chelsea wants to bring this player to the Premier League. In addition, Osimhen is also being targeted by other teams so Chelsea must be able to handle this more quickly and if Chelsea are very willing to let Lukaku go to another team like Napoli, I think it will look more like a player swap between Lukaku and Osimhen for both teams.
Unfortunately, its not difficult for Chelsea to sign Victor Osihmen after both manager have their each influence between Antonio Caonte want to sign Chelsea's players Romelu Lukaku and Enzo Maresca want get Osimhen.
Both of them have out by their manager from regular team with Lukaku withdrew from main squad and he must get training with the junior team, Osimhen get the same with Lukaku after Antonio Conte not using him in last several pre season matches.

I don't think problem if Chelsea reach agreement deal for selling Romelu Lukaku to Napoli and other side Napoli will easily sell his players Osimhen to Chelsea, but several days left before first Premier League match its make difficult for Chelsea if want getting Osimhen and he need time get more adapting well under Enzo Maresca tactician.
In another related news Chelsea had agreed to offer the duo of Lukaku and Casadei plus £38.5m for Osimen Link: https://dailypost.ng/Transfer-Chelsea-get-major-Osimhen-boost-as-Napoli-ask-for-two-players-plus- , I believe this offer is juicy enough for Napoli to release Osimen who had already made up his mind to leave Napoli, and it's very obvious that Antonio Conte wanted Lukaku in Napoli while Lukaku is not welcome in Standard Bridge based on his previous mediocre performance during his stay in the club, honestly I think Chelsea would do every possible means to secure the service of Osimen whom I believe would perform well for the club in EPL following his past records in Ligue1 and Seria A, though PSG is also in pursuit to buy him too unfortunately his sign-on fee demanded by Napoli was too high thus this Chelsea offer is considerate from my point of view.
hero member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 565
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
At a point I felt like Napoli wasn't ready to sell Osimhen with the hefty release clause they have leveled on the player. The fact that the player is a promising one have already made him sought-after, making the 100 million you suggested a reasonable amount to be considered by top clubs who have interest in him and also have the money. But the problem is, adding another 30 million on the player makes him very expensive to buy. Whilst I believe there are clubs who have the capacity to purchase the player for a great price because of their ambition this season, I don't think those clubs will be ready to give a whooping 130 million to Napoli in exchange of Victor Osimhen.

Chelsea has the money to sign Osimhen, had it been he is from Europe they wouldn't bargain the way trey are doing him right now but they are using Lukaku as bait and that's very unfair for Osimhen. African best player of 2023 is been treated like someone that is been force to stay but no matter what, I don't want him ridicule his career in Napoli, Chelsea need a player like him, someone that is ready to make the team win and that's the only way they can do well this season and aim for top spot in the table.

Transfer aside, I hope Alex still remember that this is going to be the third season Chelsea has made it's last appearance in the Champions League, if they don't make a come back this season then next season is going to be the fourth time with appearance in Champions League, they will be forgotten or possibly remembered for some thing the way Arsenal is facing right now.
Seriously, the Osimhen-Chelsea story goes beyond a deal. Some feel Osimhen is undervalued since he's African. Thats valid, and I've always support fair play. We also need to understand Chelsea's perspective. While building a championship team, they're also being economical. Good business, and more clubs should do it.

Even if it may go against the trend, using Lukaku as a negotiation chip is smart. Yes, Osimhen is a top striker. But €80-100 million is a lot. Chelsea's new ownership wants to develop a sustainable model, which involves staying on budget.

Important choice for Osimhen. He should consider his career, development, and effect. Sometimes that involves accepting a lower offer to join the correct club.

Chelsea wants Champions League. They dont want to be like Arsenal, always close to greatness but never successful. They may need Osimhen to advance.
hero member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 502
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Maybe Chelsea doesn’t understand that It’s not about the quantity of players you are having that’s going to help the club, it’s about the quality of the players that a club is having, so I am just surprised that Chelsea is selling one of the quality players that they are having, and they keep on accumulating young players for the club. I never expected Chelsea to sell a player like Gallagher. Since they prefer to play with young players who have little experience, the season will soon be starting. Let’s see how things will be for them, but selling Gallagher doesn’t make any sense to me, and it think it’s a wrong idea.
Well ion the contrary, i don't think Chelsea doesn't understand the effects of having quality players only, I think it's mainly them wanting to make some needed reshuffling in the team and I believe their coach has got a strategy where in the players signed will fit in and those sold weren't fitting in maybe, so basically they have got something which they are up to and they know much better so we can't be concluding already from this end until the season begins it will become much clearer and we get absolutely parameters for judgment.
Chelsea currently has a fat squad to compete next season and that is actually a good thing but also very bad in my opinion, with the many choices of players currently available, of course Enzo Maresca has many choices in building the team and determining their main line up in next season, but on the other hand, there will be many players who may not get enough playing time at Chelsea, which will indirectly make the internal condition of the team unstable because of the desire of each player to play.
Chelsea currently has 44 players in their squad and just imagine how confused Enzo Maresca will be to determine their main players next season considering that each player has different qualities and performance in the squad, most of Chelsea players are young players and I dont know why do I think Chelsea should need to add there are several older players in their line-up next season to stabilize experience and stamina.
In several pre-season matches we saw that they were not able to show good play and performance, so many fans doubted the quality of the players that Chelsea currently has.
Jump to: