Topic: Premier League Prediction Thread 2021/2022 - page 917. (Read 778978 times)

If Zidane takes charge of Manchester United, the team will surely become more experienced as he will act as an experienced coach. Not only does he have to be an experienced coach but he has to carry enough responsibility and be hardworking and we think Zidane can certainly take Man United very far if he doesn't have a good move. Manchester United is not a self-reliant team but if they can get a good experienced player in their team and coach they will roar again. Of course he's a great player but at his age he doesn't have much attacking power now, but if we have another player like him at Man United they could be at the top of the points table next season. Anyway I think for next season manchester united manager must add a good coach and players to his team but they can be in good position.

The older and more experienced ones generally perform better, but if Zidane takes full charge, Manchester United will be roaring back on their own. It will only be best if you can form the right cells and players and be ready to attack in any way. Still Manchester United is a self-sufficient team, because Fernandez is still among the best players, he will perform better but is losing out with the age gap.

But I don't think so, Julian Alvarez has gotten quite dominant playing time, even though he can't do it full time, but he can show his performance as an attacking player who is also very talented.
Just look at almost all of the Premier League and UCL matches this season, he is always involved and has provided quite lot of goals and assists for Manchester City, the potential that Julian Alvarez has is really very clear that he will become an important player for Manchester City.
Moreover, Julian Alvarez is player who is able to play well every time Pep trusts him to be included in the Manchester City squad to finish the match, I doubt he will be let go easily if another team wants him.
Moreover, he also still has quite long contact with Manchester City, there are many opportunities to be able to increase his title winnings in the future, if he prioritizes his career then I sure he will not leave, especially for PSG.

Yes, the problem is, Unietd has many shortcomings in all areas. So, that's quite a dilemma for Manchester United. If they sell Bruno, then they have to get a player who can at least be better than him. However, for example, even if the player is good, can he really make a good contribution too? If the other lines at Man United are still the same or mostly the same? Or will he be able to succeed if the club management and coaches are still the same? Ah, Man United is still having problems so far and still has shortcomings in all lines, as well as in its coach and management.

However, if we talk about a coach for Man United, we will definitely blame Hag. But again, is there anyone who can be like Ten Hag in the future if he leaves Man United. The problems at Manchester United are very complex, should everything be completely overhauled, from management, players, to coaches? 

Encouragement and believing in the ability of that player is something most times only a coach can do better than anyone else, if a coach is making a player believe he's good, other people's opinion may not matter much because the coach is the first and most important critics to the player but whenever the coach is doing the opposite of encouraging the players, their performance is definitely not going to make sense.

Arteta and guardiola, even klop are good examples of how much a coach can impact a team, Arsenal might not have won a trophy in the last few seasons, but their present form is a threat to many teams both in the English league and the other leagues, I believe that if Manchester united gets a good coach who can go beyond just criticizing and quarrelling the players, they are going to so much better, Rashford needs a coach who's going to make him understand how much he can achieve if he puts in more effort to bringing out his best and so are many other Manchester united players.

Any team that really wants to improve and make a whole lot of progress, the ability of the team lays mostly in the ability of their head coach because they will be playing according to his instructions and tactics, so I'd the coach is giving Instructions that may not help the players, then most definitely they are not going to perform as much as they should have done if they had a better coach who has been encouraging them well enough.

Alvarez is a great striker, I wonder why Pep prefers playing Haaland than him, a club like Mancity who is contesting for the big titles should not let their striker be a player who is not adding any value in the build up instead he relies on the stress of build ups from his player just to do the finishing. A lot is expected as a striker not just scoring free goals alone, and Alvarez is the kind of player. You can see him in the mid field, wing or any position doing cool passes aswell compared to Haaland.

Usually, any player will think about getting retired when they get older, and playing at an older age cannot be easy for any player.
Jamie Vardy is a 37-year-old player who plays for Leicester and he is a legendary player in this team. Leicester is happy to have a player in this level in the team and that's why they extended the contract of Jamie Vardy for a longer time.
Jamie Vardy joined Leicester back in 2012 and he played in 464 games for his team. He scored 190 goals during these years. Now he extended his contract for one more year.

Chelsea spent lots of money on their last coach as he tried to make many changes in this team and improve the team. Now since they started working with Enzo Maresca, they started hiring players for Maresca to have a better team in the next season. Chelsea is trying hard to get back to the top of the table again.
The first player they bought for Maresca was Tosin Adarabioyo the former player of Fulham, he signed the contract with Chelsea for four years.

Well I don't know how certain about the case of zidane being the perfect fit for Manchester united but I do understand that he is one of the few coaches that has potential and again why I don't feel confident with zidane is that he has only managed a real Madrid side which actually posses the height of high class when it comes to player ratings, with the like of Ronaldo , modric benzema and so many great it's definitely going to hard not to be successful in one way or the other.

Julián Álvarez have the choice to make here, he should either chose between regular playing time and staying on the bench which I am sure he will chose regular playing time because every player wants to play. Looking at it in another point of view, Álvarez might soon be a first choice striker in Manchester if Pep leaves the team because I am sure once Pep leaves, Haaland will definitely leaves as well.
Therefore, I think City are not willing to let Alvarez go so that he can represent Haaland in the future; and likewise if he leavers for PSG and PSG eventually sign Osimhen, he will still face the same problem he do face here.

This will be a concern because next season there will be several clubs including big clubs that will make changes which in the end will slightly reduce their probability in the trophy race.

Currently, if you look at the situation, it is likely that several clubs such as Manchester United, Liverpool and Chelsea are 3 clubs that are still considered big and will make changes, especially Chelsea and Liverpool at this time not only some players are threatened with leaving now the coach has started to leave and this will obviously be a little doubtful because the new coach may not be as good as before.

This condition makes Mancehster City the one who will benefit because however with their current situation it is clear that they will become favorites again which fortunately there are Arsenal who can be competitors.
Although in recent news it is said that Manchester City is also likely to lose some of its core players but until now it has only been a rumor.

Rumors are that it's not just Paris Saint-Germain who wants Julian Alvarez's services, because Chelsea are also being linked with one of the Manchester City strikers. from the papers I've read, making that happen this summer seems like it's going to be very difficult, despite Alvarez's demands for more playing time. However, it is very likely that City will not accept the offer for the Argentine player to leave the Etihad. which means, Chelsea and PSG have to look for other options to recruit a productive striker in this summer's transfer window. I'm very sure Pep will keep this player. Even though he often acts as a supersub, he is a player who really contributes to City, especially when Haaland is injured. That's why Alvarez will be retained because of his contribution and he is an important part of Pep Guardiola's plans. If City let Alvarez join another club in the summer transfer window, that means one less strength. in other words, City must find a replacement to complete the squad. Instead of doing so, Pep seems to be taking an approach with this Argentinian striker. Well, I'm not sure if Alvarez will leave the Etihad anytime soon.

Bruno's role in the squad this season is indeed much better than what he did in the previous season as well as with the big ego problem being a bit muted this season. But because Manchester United's performance is not too good, Bruno's condition is also carried away even though if you look in terms of actual performance Bruno is one of the players who is above average for this season.

Ten Hag's strategy is sometimes confusing. Not only for those of us watching but for the players as well because sometimes we can see chaotic schemes that actually make Manchester United's condition not too good in the end.
What is surprising is why until now Manchester United have not given a good response even though if you look at the current conditions it is actually quite appropriate if Manchester United are looking for new alternatives as a coach.

Manchester United have good players,what they lack at the moment to me is a good coach.A good coach is someone who can come to the team,and motivate those boys at the club,inject into them a winning mentality,and always encourage them whenever they make mistakes.Coach don't always criticize players,else,they will fumble and play rubbish on the field.When players are not inform,it is the work of the coach to build confidence back into those players so they can perform well.Take a look at how Arteta revive every dead thing in Arsenal,and they are now competiting fiercely for the tittle.For two seasons now,they've been the only team challenging City for the tittle.

Let's just see what will happen and how Chelsea's performances will be next season under Enzo Maresca as head coach. It is really hard to predict how his performance is going to be in managing Chelsea. Enzo Maresca has a good record as a coach, but like many other good coaches, he may also find it difficult to manage Chelsea. I don't think it is going to be easy for him. I wish they had given Pochettino enough time; it would have been better.I don't think changing the head coach frequently can easily solve Chelsea's problems. Chelsea needs to give any coach a good period of time to see how their performance looks. It is not easy to be a manager for just a season and take a weak club back to its standard.

Well in Sir Alex Ferguson era, Manchester United name was shining and things in the team weren't great after him. Ten Hag saved Manchester United in the beginning from a disastrous season and he was able to win a trophy at least this season. I wouldn't say that he was the saviour or the best choice but at least he tried but Manchester United needs more qualified players and to rely less on players that no longer can add something to the team.
I agree that a new coach and new strategies are a must to improve the team especially with a comprehensive staff that could give some money to recruit new players so a better outcome would be expected.

Yesterday, I read a report that Chelsea are trying to sign Julian Alvarez to the team but what wasn't stated in the report was if it was on permanent basis or on loan offer. Though many people will argue with me but if I'm to be a club manager, I'll easily pick Julian Alvarez ahead of Erling Haaland because he's more of a team player than his Norwegian teammate. Julian Alvarez does fall deep when the opposing team defense is becoming too hard to break and creates chances for others to score and he's also better than Haaland in terms of foot work.
If Manchester City is now open to loan the Argentine out for next season, I think it's a good decision that'll favor Alvarez because it'll give him more playing time to reach the peak of his potentials. If not Chelsea, Alvarez should go to another big club in England and prove himself.

In as much as Haaland is injury-free every season definitely Julián Álvarez would have a limited playing time, though Guardiola had played the duo in some matches I think it hasn't yielded positive results that is why Alvarez is usually on the bench in most matches though Guardiola had tried to give him game time , from my own point of view if PSG can guarantee him a regular playing time then he should leave because he is expected to play regularly for his club to retain his role on national team (Argentina) striker else another striker might take his position.

Fernandes has actually played quite well so far, it's just that Ten Hag doesn't have the best way to tame the squad he handles. There are rumors that several former Man Utd players say that the only person worthy of managing Man Utd now is Zidane, they are very confident that Zidane will be able to return Man Utd's glory as when it was still managed by Alex Ferguson. The composition of Man Utd's players is actually very good and just like you, I also think that Fernandes is currently 29 and he is still fit to play for Man Utd for some time to come.

I wouldn't compare like that exactly, I think the result of this goal difference in goals scored and conceded is due to poor tactics and match formation. They don't just need to change the coach who tried to build something all season and failed - they also need to buy players, review and rebuild the squad. I think only a new coach can do that without bias