IMHO I don't think dishing out feedback to those who participate is a good idea at all, especially with someone on DefaultTrust like Stunna. It's only going to make us see a rise in scammers with inflated trust scores. I did receive feedback from Stunna for participating but personally I'd rather all the participants (including me) have the feedback taken away from them than me just keep quiet and keep my extra positive trust rating.
Just quoting this to bring it back into Stunna's eye. In my opinion this is an issue that does need to be addressed, rather than ignored - the longer it is left for the higher the chance of it being abused.
Removed all of these trusts, thanks for bringing up this valid point. I don't feel that it would have caused any significant damage, but there isn't a sufficient burden of trust placed on participants of the campaign so it wasn't right for me to boost everyone's reputation. I understand everyone wants to accumulate trust regardless of whether their intentions are to scam or not, so I'm quite sorry about this.
You should limit the trust for high posters (> 400) and Sr. and Hero Members.
And what's the point in that? You're saying that to try and get yourself more trust. Giving it to just Sr. and Hero Members is pointless, and giving it to high posters would still result in inflated trust scores regardless.
This prevents newbies from joining in the campaign and making 50 posts to earn trust.
I think nobody should get trust for this. Trust should be for trading, we dont risk anything with this, and Stunna also doesnt risk anything so, how are we becoming "trusted" just by posting for sig campaign?
Of course there is trust involved. Stunna trusts us to not cheat posts. We trust Stunna to pay us for our hard work.
No he is not trusting us not to cheat posts, he checks us to se we are not cheating posts LOL
. On the other side , yeah its fine for us to give him 1+ feedback but only once.
i gave to stunna 3 positive feedback i should remove two of them now?
After all, that would not just demonstrate loyalty, but rather it would demonstrate that they are contributors to the Bitcointalk community with no flagged post abuse.
