The argument isn't necessarily about people getting more, it's about PrimeDice losing out on board presence because the numbers of participants are dwindling, I'm sure that even some of the PD stalwarts are questioning their position given the difference between other campaigns.
Like I say, it's not about being the highest, it's about being close enough to your competition to retain your key participants. People who only make 50 posts moving over is dust (although it adds up), but if people who posts hundreds of posts a month moves across then that is a hit.
Just food for thought
Yup, this is true, I guess the bottom line of this thou is the "Bottom Line" if PD start seeing a change in profits they will have to change things, which could be more advertising (better payouts for us) or could mean smarter advertising (so no need for us).
Yup. A lot of these new campaigns are not directly related to dice games, although they are related to other Bitcoin streams. You could argue that only gambling game signature campaigns could hurt PrimeDice but it's likely more than that.
It may be the case that PrimeDice is established enough to get on fine for a month with little advertising.
Anyway, the advertising strategy is not within our remit, and of course any payment for our posts is gratefully accepted
It would be interesting to see some analysis of the major players in the advertising, ie user base, btc turn over, growth, area, running costs.... I know these are all figures we will never see, but i bet PD is probs the biggest player and yeah can probably handle the odd month of not being the biggest advertiser.
And yes... payment for our posts is very very much appreciated.