Do you play slots when you get bored with dice?
in slot almost nothing depends on you, I don't like them
but sometimes I play poker and roulette using dice strategies
Topic: Primedice.com | Since 2013 | Longest Running Crypto Casino | 113 BTC Jackpot! - page 1003. (Read 1989788 times)
January 27, 2015, 11:13:50 AM
in slot almost nothing depends on you, I don't like them
but sometimes I play poker and roulette using dice strategies
January 27, 2015, 11:00:15 AM
Do you play slots when you get bored with dice?
January 27, 2015, 09:48:22 AM
This is why I love PD 
I play it with only 500k satos , it hits less than 500 or 600 rolls
You can try play it under my ref if you don't mind
This my yesterday's bet (26 Jan )
Oh Congratulation! You are the first one I saw to have hit 9900x after hui! I play it with only 500k satos , it hits less than 500 or 600 rolls
You can try play it under my ref if you don't mind
This my yesterday's bet (26 Jan )
You would have been more lucky if the bet was a bit bigger
January 27, 2015, 09:47:40 AM
why dont more people play pvp? seems pretty cool.
Most likely because it takes a decent amount of time to find an opponent for larger bets. PVP is a pretty smart way to gamble as it is zero edge though. We've considered removing it for when we add in our friends-list/chat as PVP is somewhat unpopular, but I find it quite neat.
Why cant you keep friend list with pvp? What's the use of removing it?
If there's demand for it then we'll keep it. Going to have to look into the stats for it on a daily basis.
Why remove it? Having the option there is always nice. Does it take any extra work or development in place?
what is "House Edge"? what does it mean?
the first post says it is 0% but the website says it is 1%
the first post says it is 0% but the website says it is 1%
It's how casinos make their money by slightly having the odds in their favor http://casinogambling.about.com/od/oddsandends/a/houseedge.htm
January 27, 2015, 09:39:30 AM
Played it with 500k satos , it hits less than 500 or 600 rolls
You can try play it under my ref if you don't mind
This my yesterday's bet (26 Jan )
You can try play it under my ref if you don't mind
This my yesterday's bet (26 Jan )
January 27, 2015, 05:17:33 AM
what is "House Edge"? what does it mean?
the first post says it is 0% but the website says it is 1%
The house edge is 1%.the first post says it is 0% but the website says it is 1%
In the first post it says that its 0% house edge for player VS player(that's a different game). For the main game the house edge is1%.
With a 1% house edge, the expected value of your game is 99% of your bet size.
For example, you have a 49.5% chance to win a x2 bet (49.5%*2 = 99%) or a 0.01% chance to win a 9900x bet (0.01%*9900 = 99%).
January 27, 2015, 05:02:08 AM
what is "House Edge"? what does it mean?
the first post says it is 0% but the website says it is 1%
The house edge is 1%.the first post says it is 0% but the website says it is 1%
In the first post it says that its 0% house edge for player VS player(that's a different game). For the main game the house edge is1%.
January 27, 2015, 03:35:27 AM
what is "House Edge"? what does it mean?
the first post says it is 0% but the website says it is 1%
the first post says it is 0% but the website says it is 1%
January 27, 2015, 01:43:30 AM
Why did you remove the auto stop at certain thresholds for profit and losses? It seems to me like you are trying to encourage people to continue gambling for as long as possible to increase the chances of them busting.
there have been some people who are complaining that the auto stop isn't working maybe thats why they have removed it.
The problem wasn't so much an issue of functionality, but rather of usability. The stop on loss/win worked as it was designed to do, but it was misunderstood by many users (as the loss/win limit could be exceeded while autobetting before stopping, which not everyone accounted for). This led to big unexpected losses for some players and a number of complaints, resulting in PD disabling the function.
I cannot speak in the place of Stunna or any others involved in that decision, but it's possible that having a feature which requires a verbose disclaimer about its implementation and usage, might not fit into the overall minimalistic aesthetic of the site. Also well...if you do need that feature, there are a few Primedice autobetter bots out there, and they offer a lot more functionality than the one on the site. (Including stop on win/loss.)
January 26, 2015, 11:40:36 PM
Why did you remove the auto stop at certain thresholds for profit and losses? It seems to me like you are trying to encourage people to continue gambling for as long as possible to increase the chances of them busting.
there have been some people who are complaining that the auto stop isn't working maybe thats why they have removed it.
The problem wasn't so much an issue of functionality, but rather of usability. The stop on loss/win worked as it was designed to do, but it was misunderstood by many users (as the loss/win limit could be exceeded while autobetting before stopping, which not everyone accounted for). This led to big unexpected losses for some players and a number of complaints, resulting in PD disabling the function.
January 26, 2015, 11:21:36 PM
Why did you remove the auto stop at certain thresholds for profit and losses? It seems to me like you are trying to encourage people to continue gambling for as long as possible to increase the chances of them busting.
there have been some people who are complaining that the auto stop isn't working maybe thats why they have removed it.
The problem wasn't so much an issue of functionality, but rather of usability. The stop on loss/win worked as it was designed to do, but it was misunderstood by many users (as the loss/win limit could be exceeded while autobetting before stopping, which not everyone accounted for). This led to big unexpected losses for some players and a number of complaints, resulting in PD disabling the function.
January 26, 2015, 11:15:15 PM
Why did you remove the auto stop at certain thresholds for profit and losses? It seems to me like you are trying to encourage people to continue gambling for as long as possible to increase the chances of them busting.
there have been some people who are complaining that the auto stop isn't working maybe thats why they have removed it.
January 26, 2015, 11:06:19 PM
Why did you remove the auto stop at certain thresholds for profit and losses? It seems to me like you are trying to encourage people to continue gambling for as long as possible to increase the chances of them busting.
there have been some people who are complaining that the auto stop isn't working maybe thats why they have removed it.
January 26, 2015, 08:53:01 PM
Why did you remove the auto stop at certain thresholds for profit and losses? It seems to me like you are trying to encourage people to continue gambling for as long as possible to increase the chances of them busting.
January 26, 2015, 07:39:16 PM
Stunna, Edward --
I have sent a few emails in the past week about a deposit I made (user: Ben34) that have gone unanswered.
My deposit address had changed, without this being made known. I had sent a 1 BTC deposit to the old address and only after discovered the change.
Can this missing 1 BTC please be credited to my account, or refunded?
(Transaction ID: https://blockchain.info/tx/31a10c84d4a39f53a54a81ca8344a3157deb266dc62f6b20c99625be4f99260c)
Or refund to: 1LEFEMEUdF2CLNk2hUDJKjioXF3J71ypR
Thank you,
Ben34
The deposits to the old addresses are automatically forwarded to your account.I have sent a few emails in the past week about a deposit I made (user: Ben34) that have gone unanswered.
My deposit address had changed, without this being made known. I had sent a 1 BTC deposit to the old address and only after discovered the change.
Can this missing 1 BTC please be credited to my account, or refunded?
(Transaction ID: https://blockchain.info/tx/31a10c84d4a39f53a54a81ca8344a3157deb266dc62f6b20c99625be4f99260c)
Or refund to: 1LEFEMEUdF2CLNk2hUDJKjioXF3J71ypR
Thank you,
Ben34
If you didn't get the deposit, I reckon that the address to which you sent the bitcoin was not related to your account previously.
January 26, 2015, 06:22:59 PM
Stunna wil surely respond to this post, be a little patient 
If u really deposited a full bitcoin in the old deposit adress i am sure that they will be able to recover that and credit it to your account balance.
If u really deposited a full bitcoin in the old deposit adress i am sure that they will be able to recover that and credit it to your account balance.
January 26, 2015, 03:52:53 PM
Stunna, Edward --
I have sent a few emails in the past week about a deposit I made (user: Ben34) that have gone unanswered.
My deposit address had changed, without this being made known. I had sent a 1 BTC deposit to the old address and only after discovered the change.
Can this missing 1 BTC please be credited to my account, or refunded?
(Transaction ID: https://blockchain.info/tx/31a10c84d4a39f53a54a81ca8344a3157deb266dc62f6b20c99625be4f99260c)
Or refund to: 1LEFEMEUdF2CLNk2hUDJKjioXF3J71ypR
Thank you,
Ben34
I have sent a few emails in the past week about a deposit I made (user: Ben34) that have gone unanswered.
My deposit address had changed, without this being made known. I had sent a 1 BTC deposit to the old address and only after discovered the change.
Can this missing 1 BTC please be credited to my account, or refunded?
(Transaction ID: https://blockchain.info/tx/31a10c84d4a39f53a54a81ca8344a3157deb266dc62f6b20c99625be4f99260c)
Or refund to: 1LEFEMEUdF2CLNk2hUDJKjioXF3J71ypR
Thank you,
Ben34
January 26, 2015, 02:12:48 PM
Another amazing win from hui after 45400 rolls:
why so lucky hitting 9900x? congrats again and again Hui
hui is very patient and determined in making those bets, but indeed he is very unlucky to have only hit a 9900x after 45400 unsuccessful tries.
Chance of making no win within 45400 rolls = (1-0.01%)^45400 = 1.07%
Even if he hit 9900x after 45400rolls still I think that he would have been in profit. Cause he starts with a small amount and keeps on increasing the bet.
Nice if he do that. That would like doing a martingale technique.
While martingaling you increase the bet by 2x. You cannot certainly use martingale while doing bets on 9900x. Its more of a kind of labourcher technique.
I don't think technically you can call that martingale.
Martingale is when on 50% odds you increase the bet by 100%.
I agree that we can increase it by small percentage and I assume that hui did the same thing. But don't call it martingale(creates confusion).
Any game where you use multiplier to compensate previous losses is Martingale, IMO.
Game with 50% odds and x2 multiplier is just most used and well known version of Martingale.
"The martingale strategy has been applied to roulette as well, as the probability of hitting either red or black is close to 50%."
What you are calling is kind of a variant of martingale and that should not be called "martingale".
Read more: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martingale_(betting_system)
January 26, 2015, 02:06:48 PM
why dont more people play pvp? seems pretty cool.
Most likely because it takes a decent amount of time to find an opponent for larger bets. PVP is a pretty smart way to gamble as it is zero edge though. We've considered removing it for when we add in our friends-list/chat as PVP is somewhat unpopular, but I find it quite neat.
Why cant you keep friend list with pvp? What's the use of removing it?
If there's demand for it then we'll keep it. Going to have to look into the stats for it on a daily basis.
i am still muted in chat after 11 days
January 26, 2015, 02:06:27 PM
Another amazing win from hui after 45400 rolls:
why so lucky hitting 9900x? congrats again and again Hui
hui is very patient and determined in making those bets, but indeed he is very unlucky to have only hit a 9900x after 45400 unsuccessful tries.
Chance of making no win within 45400 rolls = (1-0.01%)^45400 = 1.07%
Even if he hit 9900x after 45400rolls still I think that he would have been in profit. Cause he starts with a small amount and keeps on increasing the bet.
Nice if he do that. That would like doing a martingale technique.
While martingaling you increase the bet by 2x. You cannot certainly use martingale while doing bets on 9900x. Its more of a kind of labourcher technique.
I don't think technically you can call that martingale.
Martingale is when on 50% odds you increase the bet by 100%.
I agree that we can increase it by small percentage and I assume that hui did the same thing. But don't call it martingale(creates confusion).
Any game where you use multiplier to compensate previous losses is Martingale, IMO.
Game with 50% odds and x2 multiplier is just most used and well known version of Martingale.
Jump to: