We just rolled out some tiny changes.
Changelog:
* Autobet: Stop @ Loss/Win removed. Many users didn't understand it was per session and some people were losing much more than they anticipated as the system stops at that loss or greater, so let's say you made a few coins but were using a 100% multiplier it would potentially be possible to do a 20BTC bet with a 0.01 stoploss and end negative 15+ despite that stoploss. This isn't really an unintended error as the system is designed to stop at the defined loss or greater but many users were utilizing this with massive amounts and losing more than anticipated when not watching closely.
Yeah right
How is it possible to do a 20BTC bet with 100% increase and a 0.01 stop loss ? Last time I checked 2 * 0.01 = 0.02 and that's where it should stop. You guys either changed the way it works without notifying anyone, or it was just lazy coding. Either way it's plain and simply your fault. Funny how the stop profit will stop in negative because it counts total profit from that autobet session. Yet a bet with loss multiplier & 0.01 stop loss can magically go up to 9BTC. I call bullshit. If it worked the way it was supposed to you wouldn't have even removed it. It's called a fucking tooltip or note..
If u have balance 1btc and run autobet with stop loss 0.1 btc , and ur autobet goes , and goes , and goes , and at some point u have 10btc on balance, ur autobet will continue till u have 0.9btc coz that is the point when u lose that 0.1 btc that u set.
I think it was coded like that. I might be wrong . I didn't rly speak with dev about it , and didn't test it properly , and now its gone so i can't check if that is correct .
Like I said, lazy ass coding. Why would anyone set it up like that?
...Oh yeah, either to make people accidentally lose a shit load of money, or pure ignorance..
Not only that but his session profit wasn't even 20BTC when it happened -- he was playing over a period of days.
So this is obviously a coding issue and they don't want to admit it because this has happened more than once to a high roller.
Why else would they remove the code if it "worked properly", instead of a adding a warning, note or tooltip?
Because he's full of shit