I'll resolve any issues as soon as we're back online. Sorry for any inconvenience.
@Mowcore, I'll sort you out as soon as we're back up
Topic: Primedice.com | Since 2013 | Longest Running Crypto Casino | 113 BTC Jackpot! - page 1602. (Read 1989496 times)
August 28, 2013, 12:47:33 PM
We're under heavier than usual ddos at the moment, our connections are maxed out.
I'll resolve any issues as soon as we're back online. Sorry for any inconvenience.
@Mowcore, I'll sort you out as soon as we're back up
I'll resolve any issues as soon as we're back online. Sorry for any inconvenience.
@Mowcore, I'll sort you out as soon as we're back up
August 28, 2013, 12:45:58 PM
First, the server was offline.
Now, the server is returning 500 Internal Server Error.
What are you doing Stunna?
Now, the server is returning 500 Internal Server Error.
What are you doing Stunna?
August 28, 2013, 11:25:18 AM
"Website is offline The server may be down for maintenance, there may be a network problem, or the site may be experiencing excessive load."
What happened?
What happened?
August 28, 2013, 10:29:07 AM
I just wanna know if I can withdraw my "winnings" or if I do will I lose em the same way because of a double spend, surely the first withdrawal cancelled that out though... need an online website first though 
August 28, 2013, 08:23:27 AM
That moment when unintentional double spend 
August 28, 2013, 08:19:52 AM
I had some problems trying to deposit some BC, was stuck on "seen by 1 peer unconfirmed" using multibit, found out I could cancel it by resetting the block chain, to which it looked like it had So i resent a smaller sum, 0.0369 (the first sum was 0.0533), that sent and primedice accepted the new transaction only to be followed by my first transaction 2 minutes later . So now I had 0.09 BC , way more than I had in my wallet to begin with! Now, I tried withdrawing 0.04 bc and was going to send back the 0.0369 to stunna to which It does not look like I will be getting as there was nothing to confirm it. My problem is the fake money that got added to my primedice account was smaller than the original amount that I first put it, leaving me with less after I withdrew 0.04 bc ( 0.0029 bc of that should of been mine) plus I am now scared with what will happen to the coins I have in my primedice account at this moment that I have been playing with since this started, will I get them if I withdraw?
Thanks, hope you can help. It's nice I can leave my coins in this new primedice! (i'd rather receive them when withdrawing them though!)
293
Thanks, hope you can help. It's nice I can leave my coins in this new primedice! (i'd rather receive them when withdrawing them though!)
293
August 28, 2013, 04:10:23 AM
uh.. I want to bet. I don't want to simulate. I've had enough of simulations. I want to use the real thing. I understand the gambling part of it, so I'm actually taking a calculated chance I'm going to win in the long run. A run of 10,000 rolls, that is.
August 27, 2013, 09:48:38 PM
I'm not for or against, but I like PD so, I do agree with Zaih, you should consider the nonce version. It will also help with server-side automated betting as you just need to count from 1 to 10,000 to make ten thousand rolls.
Are you saying make all the bets go through instantly? I think that would sort of defeat the fun in it, it'd more or less just be a remake of dice on crack.
Off the blockchain dice on crack. Yes. I suggested the same to our other favorite dice sites. It's a race who will implement it first "server side".
If it's not fun, don't do it. To some people, it might be fun. To others, it's all the voodoo math that makes it fun (or testing their Gambler's Fallacy theories).
Hmm, so you mean have either option available? Maybe have it so you can choose the delay between rolls or something. If people want it instantly they can use 0 delay.
Could definitely appeal to some people that is for sure.
Then again Dabs, if you want to test out your theories and such, why don't you just simulate it yourself? It's fairly easy to do, I'm also pretty sure there's a few sites which already offer the ability to simulate betting patterns.
August 27, 2013, 08:47:12 PM
I'm not for or against, but I like PD so, I do agree with Zaih, you should consider the nonce version. It will also help with server-side automated betting as you just need to count from 1 to 10,000 to make ten thousand rolls.
Are you saying make all the bets go through instantly? I think that would sort of defeat the fun in it, it'd more or less just be a remake of dice on crack.
Off the blockchain dice on crack. Yes. I suggested the same to our other favorite dice sites. It's a race who will implement it first "server side".
If it's not fun, don't do it. To some people, it might be fun. To others, it's all the voodoo math that makes it fun (or testing their Gambler's Fallacy theories).
August 27, 2013, 08:20:06 PM
Passed 12 million bets!
Cruising along at over 1 million bets a day!
Cruising along at over 1 million bets a day!
August 27, 2013, 12:16:08 PM
Very nice the new version, it speeds the game and make playeing much easier.
August 27, 2013, 09:50:50 AM
I'm not for or against, but I like PD so, I do agree with Zaih, you should consider the nonce version. It will also help with server-side automated betting as you just need to count from 1 to 10,000 to make ten thousand rolls.
Are you saying make all the bets go through instantly? I think that would sort of defeat the fun in it, it'd more or less just be a remake of dice on crack.
August 27, 2013, 03:44:02 AM
I'm not for or against, but I like PD so, I do agree with Zaih, you should consider the nonce version. It will also help with server-side automated betting as you just need to count from 1 to 10,000 to make ten thousand rolls.
August 26, 2013, 11:04:39 PM
Grats. I guess 100k wagered is the next milestone. Seems to be going up very quickly now with new site.
You should also fix the slow deposits issue & think about using the same provably fair system as Doog, it seems you're getting a lot of heat from it. Tried my best to stick up
You should also fix the slow deposits issue & think about using the same provably fair system as Doog, it seems you're getting a lot of heat from it. Tried my best to stick up
August 25, 2013, 10:49:26 PM
10 Million Bets Hit! the 10 millionth bet was placed by Starik69
August 25, 2013, 09:04:32 PM
just a quick suggestion on the automated betting system
-decrease on bet % on winning/losing
-increase/decrease on payout x on winning/losing
-Change the roll over/under after every X time of betting (5 times, then roll under, another 5 times, then roll over)
-decrease on bet % on winning/losing
-increase/decrease on payout x on winning/losing
-Change the roll over/under after every X time of betting (5 times, then roll under, another 5 times, then roll over)
If you want to decrease bet % you can put a negative number in that input.
Changing the payout/roll over/under is probably not something we're going to change for now unless there is demand for it. We are however looking to make the bot automatically stop at X profit/loss.
Posted quick blog here about some stuff we're working on: http://blog.primedice.com/post/59353540421/future-of-gambling-and-primedice
August 25, 2013, 08:33:04 PM
just a quick suggestion on the automated betting system
-decrease on bet % on winning/losing
-increase/decrease on payout x on winning/losing
-Change the roll over/under after every X time of betting (5 times, then roll under, another 5 times, then roll over)
-decrease on bet % on winning/losing
-increase/decrease on payout x on winning/losing
-Change the roll over/under after every X time of betting (5 times, then roll under, another 5 times, then roll over)
August 25, 2013, 07:43:12 PM
Hi Again Stunna,
When are you thinking of adding in your referral program? also would you consider a paid signature program or another raffle?
Regards,
RedMetal
When are you thinking of adding in your referral program? also would you consider a paid signature program or another raffle?
Regards,
RedMetal
This is currently one of our priorities, should be done soon, I've done signatures in the past not sure how effective they are.
owch, should have played 2x multiplier 
Ouch
I've updated the thread layout on first page of this thread by the way.
August 24, 2013, 11:59:53 PM
owch, should have played 2x multiplier
August 24, 2013, 11:47:02 PM
DAT 20 LOSING STREAK
Jump to: