Topic: Primedice.com | Since 2013 | Longest Running Crypto Casino | 113 BTC Jackpot! - page 207. (Read 1990485 times)

Good catch, it's seems they are really similar because random names aren't like that + can't believe it's just coincidence. Also isn't it prohobited to own more than two account on primedice?
His strategy really works well but it's another question how much he lost too, even with 97% win chance, it's still pretty easy to lost your coin and even if you play like this: wager 1 btc until you lose, then try to profit that 1 btc <-- is very risky too. He is lucky...

Looks like maker433, Deneme4321, and denemem44 and Makerdenemem are all exactly 1 person.

They all got the "deneme" in their nickname and the last "Makerdenemem" and "maker433" are also together.

So basically one gambler has done over 380BTC in wagered and won over 38BTC.

Whatever strategy he is using, it seems to work pretty well.

Does primedice do zero-confirmation deposits right now?

I think every once in a while they say they do, but it seems like right now they don't.

To be on the Top Wagered is much easier and requires less bankroll: betting 1 BTC at 99% winning chance, 10 times, gives me a total wagered ammount of 10 BTC (asumming I don't lose), even when I have only 1 BTC. I can keep betting that 1 BTC until I lose.

The 1% house is a sure thing but it does not always give bad result, somehow they manage it to get huge profit in the early bet but later on he just using the profit to wager, so it is possible to have this kind of trick used in this kind of event. And I believe if you checked on the top 1 result, he is losing more than just 0.9 btc to be sure, if he is just manage the get the top 1 wagering. You can't count it this way, there is so many possibilities to let in current situation

GIVEAWAY: Bronze Age Challenge!
Ends: 13/08/18 @ Midday (12pm) GMT

Congrats to all the Time Travelers who have fulfilled the 1st quest from the Stone Age! You must again embark on the time machine and seek for the new clues to proceed on your path. In the Bronze Age, our predecessors have left you the tools to restore. Your 1st artefact is at the beginning of this Era, number 33.00, a small bronze dice to get it back to the present days. After you find it in the long forsaken caves, jump into your time machine, and melt the bronze into our Jackpot pot, roll the 77.77, and your new quest ends for the time being.he time being.

All players who achieve the challenge in the next 7 days, will get a share in the prize pool! There is no limit to the amount of winners, and the more players who get involved the higher the prize pool! So if you get more players involved, then you win more!

Requirements:

- Roll a winning bet hitting 33.00, then (not consecutively) roll a winning bet hitting 77.77.
- Minimum bet is 100 satoshi BTC or 1,200 ether or 10,000 litoshi.
- 1 valid entry per person.
- 10+ forum post count.

Prize Pool(s):

- Minimum prize pool: 0.01 BTC
- If over 30 participants: 0.03 BTC
- If over 40 participants 0.05 BTC
- If over 50 participants: 0.08 BTC

How to Enter:

Answer in the following Topic:
https://forum.primedice.com/topic/32687-%F0%9F%8F%86-008-btc-bronze-age-challenge/
And paste your bet id, then highlight and click on the link bet button, as shown in image below (at our Forum)

That 32BTC profit though. Well, considering the amount that he wagered, it is not surprising to see that profit. It would be pretty interesting to see the names of those who lost a lot in PD. That is not to smite them but for us to see the how much people are losing in dice. Though I'm not hoping for it to be published because it will not do any good for the website. 

Here is the previous week, unlike that one the high wagered players did tend to pull off larger profits. While it is true that variance decreases after more sessions of betting the tiny house edge here hardly seemed to have an effect on these players of this week above.

Also, right now these leaderboards aren't accounting for Ethereum/litecoin, we'll be patching that up soon

If you are trying to be on the top wagered than it is much easier to start with higher bankroll however it doesnt even mean you are going to win. Variances is indeed a bitch in gambling, imagine that you are trying to win 1 btc at 1.01 odds with 100 btc wagered and ended up losing? But of course if you win, wagering with 100 btc and 0.00001 btc provide so much different return

The reason why the statistics are interesting is because normally you assume that people who wager alot, usually make alot of BTC. However out of the Top 10 there was only 1 user who both wagered alot and won alot.

The #1 wagered was almost 100 BTC and the biggest profit was less than 10 BTC.

Also the people who wagered alot, could of made small bets, however looking at the Top 10 profit list, the profits aren't even that big.

So wagered close to 100 BTC and not even winning 1 BTC doesn't seem like a good strategy. But I agree with the above poster that the luck percentage charts would also help.

People who wager that much may be addicted to gambling and/ or using some systems that requires to make many small bets. From comparison of these two lists you can clearly see that godog's system/ strategy is working well. Two more things I would like to see on these lists are no of bets (for most wagered) and luck percentage (for top winners).

You're right that's easier to get included in top winners list with 100BTC bankroll, but it's also easier to get in top losers lists if there would be any 

Even when this is true, there must be a number that gives you the most chances to be on the top winners of the week (or over a certain ammount, for example, 10 BTC).
I mean, the variance and the house edge is the same for everybody, but the ammount changes: a player who bets 0.00000001 will find his/her way much harder than a guy who can bet 100 BTC. In simpler words, it is obvious that a person who play higher, will get higher prizes and a higher chances to be there.

Dice site normally has 1 % house edge. That means you are losing 1 % of every amount you wagered. Given the current top 1 that wagered over 90 bitcoin, that mean he should be losing around 0.9 bitcoin. Thats why most of the top wagered are not on the top profit list, it is in the nature of gambling that gambler should be the one losing. The one winning alot is what we called as variance

Talking about marketing, your idea wouldn't be so appreciated, because generally the loss doesn't have an appeal on gamblers. I think that there is no dice site offering this feature.

What is crazy about that? I am pretty sure it is a possible thing to do, well I am not sure how he do it but I ever did exactly the same thing with him but because my balance is not thst big I do not have the chance to get huge profit but my wagered amount sure increasing fast. Btw there is no way they will put top losser of the week, because people will actually count on how much profit that they actually get or may be even can point something out from there that will harm owner as well

Do you guys notice how besides the #2 player (godog) most of the players who wager the most BTC, don't make the most profit. Pretty crazy eh?

I would be nice to see a "Top Losers of the Week" and just wondering how those players are doing.

I remember a few years back, people would make like 50-100 BTC per day on Primedice, but I guess alot has changed.

The best players of the week:




 

Wrong thread, mate! PD support has 8-10 members and I'm sure they did just great without you. Also, I doubt that you are a PD support member.

Some support tickets may have taken longer than expected to get solved the past week as I've been traveling, none should have taken more than 48 hours or so but please accept my apologies if you were one of those people.

think at some point over 300 people were watching
as surprising as it sounds and I might be totally mistaken here.... but the best part is usually the money givaways
we love your streams,but I think that even more interaction with the crowd would be nice
and of,course,#JelenaNursestream,#IrenaTeacherstream have long been awaited for