side is down/dead!
My god talking about waking up the dead in their graves.
Topic: Print your own bitcoin bills - print.printcoins.com (Read 23317 times)
My god talking about waking up the dead in their graves.
I think this is great. If we print our own bitcoin bills this is our advantage. Because we can now review on what transactions that we have and how to manage our bitcoin transaction and because of that we will learn how to budget or to use our bitcoin in a right because we can monitor well our expenses or transactions.
side is down/dead!
Last post was made in 2013, the thread was created in 2012. It is one of the project that came into existence during the early years of bitcoin. Almost a six year gap, and in the mean time the team might have dropped the project, thats the reason why site is down. side is down/dead!
Yeah, it links to some sort of a wrong Chinese website. This should be turned down.. Or at least, to preserve history, a warning can do.
side is down/dead!
Very nice, mate
Thank you
Thank you
How do I USE the bill? What android app I need to scan and transfer the amount to my own wallet address?
Bitcoin (orange circle, white BTC)
Blockchain (OC with a tag on top)
How do I USE the bill? What android app I need to scan and transfer the amount to my own wallet address?
Hi, we are doing physical coins and we would like to modify printcoins project to add our own design that you can see here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3127709
Would be it possible and how we can do it ?
Would be it possible and how we can do it ?
What's the appeal?
If anyone tries to spend a paper bitcoin bill, the first the acceptee would need to do is verify that there are in fact coins associated with the bill, followed by moving the coins represented by the bill to a new bitcoin address in case the bearer kept a copy of the private key themselves. Even if you knew for 100% certain that they didn't keep the key, you'd also need assurance that the bearer didn't print two bills rather than one, or even that a Piece of malware wasn't on their computer that surreptitiously transmitted the pdf or just the private key in the print file to someone else.
When I saw this topic and started reading, I thought it was so old that these concerns would have shelved the idea; can you explain how your project would attempt to address that, or if even Addressing those concerns is even possible?
Hi, we are doing physical coins and we would like to modify printcoins project to add our own design that you can see here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3127709
Would be it possible and how we can do it ?
Would be it possible and how we can do it ?
I'm still somewhat new to bitcoin, maybe that's why I see these as having very limited usefulness. On the one hand the geek in me wants to run out and get some holograms and roll my own, but otoh I see some drawbacks and I'd like others' feedback:
1. For tx where the sender is online, this adds needless complexity.
2. For offline transactions, the receiver has to trust that the buyer does not have a copy of the pk AND the bill does really have the stated btc on it. If that level of trust exists, the receiver might as well wait until the buyer gets online, no?
3. How would change work? meaning, I have a 10btc bill, and I'm buying something worth 1.37....? fall back to $/eur?
4. Use it for offline storage? The standard-no-art bitaddress.org paper wallet is just as good, and more low-key. I guess the hologram version has the advantage that it's not possible to get your pk qr accidentally scanned by a cctv camera, but that's about it. If someone else gets access to it, the tampered-with hologram is just there to tell you "don't bother checking, your bitcoins are gone".
Really, I only see this as a novelty item/gift card. That's ok, btw.
thoughts?
Correct on all accounts. Here is a slightly more useful, but more complex version. 1. For tx where the sender is online, this adds needless complexity.
2. For offline transactions, the receiver has to trust that the buyer does not have a copy of the pk AND the bill does really have the stated btc on it. If that level of trust exists, the receiver might as well wait until the buyer gets online, no?
3. How would change work? meaning, I have a 10btc bill, and I'm buying something worth 1.37....? fall back to $/eur?
4. Use it for offline storage? The standard-no-art bitaddress.org paper wallet is just as good, and more low-key. I guess the hologram version has the advantage that it's not possible to get your pk qr accidentally scanned by a cctv camera, but that's about it. If someone else gets access to it, the tampered-with hologram is just there to tell you "don't bother checking, your bitcoins are gone".
Really, I only see this as a novelty item/gift card. That's ok, btw.
thoughts?
I've slept some more on this, and I think at least in the part of the adoption cycle we're in now, these are fantastic as gift cards, to get people to at least look up bitcoin. Great stuff.
I agree that any experienced bitcoin user, both seller and buyer, will prefer mobile phone applications to bitcoin notes.
But my argument is to do the "granny" test on starting a small shop accepting bitcoin. Let´s say your granny is starting to sell alpaca socks in her shop, and all customers will be holders of both the kind of bitcoin notes I described - tamper-proof and with an easy way of identifying the issuer - and all will also have their mobile phone wallet applications.
Which method of payment would you recommend Granny to prefer?
The mobile application wallet route is the more technical one: She will at a minimum have to remember her password and back up her wallet. I don´t know the stats, but there is at least a large minority - if not majority - who will not give a single though to data security of their smartphones; many can´t even be bothered to do free security upgrades of their phone OS.
And then you have the notes, which builds nicely on her non-technical experience: If the issuer of the bitcoin note is someone from the local community she is on the top of her game in either accepting or rejecting the note. She will need no instruction in how to store the notes in her mechanical safe, and so on. The only technical part would be checking if the note is funded by scanning the QR code of the address, with no risk of divulging any private keys to cell phone hackers. Or if we want to keep it completely offline as a principle: just an app to assist her in confirming the identity of the issuer (this could be done by a PGP email signature of the bitcoin address).
i think the latter approach will be a safer and softer way of introducing use of bitcoin to most people.
BTW: My compliments on your printcoins, they look both cool and serious.
But my argument is to do the "granny" test on starting a small shop accepting bitcoin. Let´s say your granny is starting to sell alpaca socks in her shop, and all customers will be holders of both the kind of bitcoin notes I described - tamper-proof and with an easy way of identifying the issuer - and all will also have their mobile phone wallet applications.
Which method of payment would you recommend Granny to prefer?
The mobile application wallet route is the more technical one: She will at a minimum have to remember her password and back up her wallet. I don´t know the stats, but there is at least a large minority - if not majority - who will not give a single though to data security of their smartphones; many can´t even be bothered to do free security upgrades of their phone OS.
And then you have the notes, which builds nicely on her non-technical experience: If the issuer of the bitcoin note is someone from the local community she is on the top of her game in either accepting or rejecting the note. She will need no instruction in how to store the notes in her mechanical safe, and so on. The only technical part would be checking if the note is funded by scanning the QR code of the address, with no risk of divulging any private keys to cell phone hackers. Or if we want to keep it completely offline as a principle: just an app to assist her in confirming the identity of the issuer (this could be done by a PGP email signature of the bitcoin address).
i think the latter approach will be a safer and softer way of introducing use of bitcoin to most people.
BTW: My compliments on your printcoins, they look both cool and serious.
I'm still somewhat new to bitcoin, maybe that's why I see these as having very limited usefulness. On the one hand the geek in me wants to run out and get some holograms and roll my own, but otoh I see some drawbacks and I'd like others' feedback:
1. For tx where the sender is online, this adds needless complexity.
2. For offline transactions, the receiver has to trust that the buyer does not have a copy of the pk AND the bill does really have the stated btc on it. If that level of trust exists, the receiver might as well wait until the buyer gets online, no?
3. How would change work? meaning, I have a 10btc bill, and I'm buying something worth 1.37....? fall back to $/eur?
4. Use it for offline storage? The standard-no-art bitaddress.org paper wallet is just as good, and more low-key. I guess the hologram version has the advantage that it's not possible to get your pk qr accidentally scanned by a cctv camera, but that's about it. If someone else gets access to it, the tampered-with hologram is just there to tell you "don't bother checking, your bitcoins are gone".
Really, I only see this as a novelty item/gift card. That's ok, btw.
thoughts?
1. For tx where the sender is online, this adds needless complexity.
2. For offline transactions, the receiver has to trust that the buyer does not have a copy of the pk AND the bill does really have the stated btc on it. If that level of trust exists, the receiver might as well wait until the buyer gets online, no?
3. How would change work? meaning, I have a 10btc bill, and I'm buying something worth 1.37....? fall back to $/eur?
4. Use it for offline storage? The standard-no-art bitaddress.org paper wallet is just as good, and more low-key. I guess the hologram version has the advantage that it's not possible to get your pk qr accidentally scanned by a cctv camera, but that's about it. If someone else gets access to it, the tampered-with hologram is just there to tell you "don't bother checking, your bitcoins are gone".
Really, I only see this as a novelty item/gift card. That's ok, btw.
thoughts?
1. Yes, notes are for local use. But when you haven´t got a local alpaca sock vendor there is the option to redeem your bitcoin notes and send them by an online tx.
2. No, the receiver only has to trust the _issuer_ of a properly designed, tamper-proof note.
3. A variety of large and small denominations, just like other forms of cash.
4. Yes, storage of a plain paper wallet is just like stashing cash.
(printcoins operator here)
I have found that they have made great propaganda tools, and are great at getting people into bitcoins without having to set them up with the tech. I have bought silver, local eggs, and paid for people's services with them. Some go on to create digital wallets, and take part in the network, some use them again to buy stuff off of others, and some just sit on them hoping they will be worth a lot one day.
They are really great with bring people into bitcoin, but I think that between set up bitcoin users, mobile phone applications make better ways of transferring coins.
I'm still somewhat new to bitcoin, maybe that's why I see these as having very limited usefulness. On the one hand the geek in me wants to run out and get some holograms and roll my own, but otoh I see some drawbacks and I'd like others' feedback:
1. For tx where the sender is online, this adds needless complexity.
2. For offline transactions, the receiver has to trust that the buyer does not have a copy of the pk AND the bill does really have the stated btc on it. If that level of trust exists, the receiver might as well wait until the buyer gets online, no?
3. How would change work? meaning, I have a 10btc bill, and I'm buying something worth 1.37....? fall back to $/eur?
4. Use it for offline storage? The standard-no-art bitaddress.org paper wallet is just as good, and more low-key. I guess the hologram version has the advantage that it's not possible to get your pk qr accidentally scanned by a cctv camera, but that's about it. If someone else gets access to it, the tampered-with hologram is just there to tell you "don't bother checking, your bitcoins are gone".
Really, I only see this as a novelty item/gift card. That's ok, btw.
thoughts?
1. For tx where the sender is online, this adds needless complexity.
2. For offline transactions, the receiver has to trust that the buyer does not have a copy of the pk AND the bill does really have the stated btc on it. If that level of trust exists, the receiver might as well wait until the buyer gets online, no?
3. How would change work? meaning, I have a 10btc bill, and I'm buying something worth 1.37....? fall back to $/eur?
4. Use it for offline storage? The standard-no-art bitaddress.org paper wallet is just as good, and more low-key. I guess the hologram version has the advantage that it's not possible to get your pk qr accidentally scanned by a cctv camera, but that's about it. If someone else gets access to it, the tampered-with hologram is just there to tell you "don't bother checking, your bitcoins are gone".
Really, I only see this as a novelty item/gift card. That's ok, btw.
thoughts?
1. Yes, notes are for local use. But when you haven´t got a local alpaca sock vendor there is the option to redeem your bitcoin notes and send them by an online tx.
2. No, the receiver only has to trust the _issuer_ of a properly designed, tamper-proof note.
3. A variety of large and small denominations, just like other forms of cash.
4. Yes, storage of a plain paper wallet is just like stashing cash.
I'm still somewhat new to bitcoin, maybe that's why I see these as having very limited usefulness. On the one hand the geek in me wants to run out and get some holograms and roll my own, but otoh I see some drawbacks and I'd like others' feedback:
1. For tx where the sender is online, this adds needless complexity.
2. For offline transactions, the receiver has to trust that the buyer does not have a copy of the pk AND the bill does really have the stated btc on it. If that level of trust exists, the receiver might as well wait until the buyer gets online, no?
3. How would change work? meaning, I have a 10btc bill, and I'm buying something worth 1.37....? fall back to $/eur?
4. Use it for offline storage? The standard-no-art bitaddress.org paper wallet is just as good, and more low-key. I guess the hologram version has the advantage that it's not possible to get your pk qr accidentally scanned by a cctv camera, but that's about it. If someone else gets access to it, the tampered-with hologram is just there to tell you "don't bother checking, your bitcoins are gone".
Really, I only see this as a novelty item/gift card. That's ok, btw.
thoughts?
1. For tx where the sender is online, this adds needless complexity.
2. For offline transactions, the receiver has to trust that the buyer does not have a copy of the pk AND the bill does really have the stated btc on it. If that level of trust exists, the receiver might as well wait until the buyer gets online, no?
3. How would change work? meaning, I have a 10btc bill, and I'm buying something worth 1.37....? fall back to $/eur?
4. Use it for offline storage? The standard-no-art bitaddress.org paper wallet is just as good, and more low-key. I guess the hologram version has the advantage that it's not possible to get your pk qr accidentally scanned by a cctv camera, but that's about it. If someone else gets access to it, the tampered-with hologram is just there to tell you "don't bother checking, your bitcoins are gone".
Really, I only see this as a novelty item/gift card. That's ok, btw.
thoughts?
+1 for post #40 from canton for this good summary.
...and +1000 for robkohr's proof-of-concept printcoin web page and for providing the source code.
Of course having an EASY Java Script solution like bitaddress.org would be the nicest solution for the people who cannot easily set up a local web server but still want a save solution to print their own printcoins. --> Maybe I have an idea here...
So, robkohr (or any other programmer here), could you imagine considering offering a JS-based printcoin.com implementation?
I would use the JS-based bicoinaddress.org straight away, but it lacks two features for me (both of which printcoins.com offers):
- entering my OWN private keys (instead of having new random ones generated for the printed bills)
- the secret key QR code size is too large (unlike printcoin bills) to be covered by a 2.5 cm (1 inch) hologram.
Update: I have just requested here enhancement of the javascript code on bitaddress.org - maybe this is the more reasonable approach, since the codebase in javascript (a single html file) is already available.
...and +1000 for robkohr's proof-of-concept printcoin web page and for providing the source code.
Of course having an EASY Java Script solution like bitaddress.org would be the nicest solution for the people who cannot easily set up a local web server but still want a save solution to print their own printcoins. --> Maybe I have an idea here...
The reason this is server side rather than js is that I have not found one decent pdf creation library written in javascript (just a couple half hearted attempts that were useless). pdf's are the simplest way to create something that will print to exact dimensions on the web.
--> ...concerning bitaddress.org (which is fully javascript based), I am able to generate proper PDFs extremely easily! I just use the "Print" button and print to my PDF-printer!!! (this is extremely easy under Linux (=my case), but free PDF printer drivers also exist for Windows and can be downloaded and installed at a click of a button).So, robkohr (or any other programmer here), could you imagine considering offering a JS-based printcoin.com implementation?
I would use the JS-based bicoinaddress.org straight away, but it lacks two features for me (both of which printcoins.com offers):
- entering my OWN private keys (instead of having new random ones generated for the printed bills)
- the secret key QR code size is too large (unlike printcoin bills) to be covered by a 2.5 cm (1 inch) hologram.
Update: I have just requested here enhancement of the javascript code on bitaddress.org - maybe this is the more reasonable approach, since the codebase in javascript (a single html file) is already available.
UPDATE: I think there is good news for the subject of this thread's title "print your own bitcoin bills", especially, if I add both "SECURELY" and "EASILY" at the same time. And in good quality of course.
Since today, a new solution exists:
* 100% offline
* Open Source < 500 kB (html/javascript)
* High Resolution images (printing in full 600 dpi), at least 10 different designs (=colors)
* No IT expert knowledge required:
- No need to set up a web server
- No need to work on the command line
* Works on Linux and Windows
* Only requires FIREFOX (may have problems with other browser, so consider Firefox not a browser but a bitcoin bill printing software)
* Configurable for certain individual aspects!
Now everybody can easily print High Quality bitcoin paper notes 100% securely.
So I think this fits perfectly to the subject of this thread, therefore I wanted to let you know about the news in this posting:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1383041
Thanks for all the contributors to this topic.
i personally dont know anyone who would accept one of these. how does this benefit the bitcoin user ?
one can use it as an offline wallet to stash their own coins if paranoid. It's only useful if you trust the person that printed them (who knows the private key since they printed it on the certificate to begin with). They could be interesting gifts.
i personally dont know anyone who would accept one of these. how does this benefit the bitcoin user ?
Jump to: