Pages:
Author

Topic: Privacy Concerns, Can Administrators and Mods Access Personal Messages? - page 2. (Read 364 times)

legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1359
~
I understand the need for this discussion and hope to hear from moderators or individuals who can shed light on this matter.

What is there to discuss, really? No type of plain-text communication is actually created with privacy as a priority. Even if it were somehow technically impossible for the forum administrators to access private messages, there would still be a range of potential man-in-the-middle scenarios to worry about. Your local network administrator can intercept communication, as can your ISP, your VPN provider, CloudFlare, hosting provider, server administrators, ... Have you ever wondered who might be monitoring your email communication?

If privacy matters to you, take the time to understand how to effectively encrypt your sensitive communications.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1045
Goodnight, ohh Leo!!! 🦅
What informations do you really have to convey through PM's that doesn't warranty the admin's solicitude?? BTC deals that the forum doesn't have? Ponzis that nobody has never heard of?? Sexuality and sensitivity?? Except these PM's are really concrete for encryptions, but then i see nothing wrong with that.
Theymos won't make users anonymity so discreet that he ain't got no details about it... afterall he controls the site itself...

Sandra 🧑‍🦰
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 554
#SWGT PRE-SALE IS LIVE
theymos has complete access to all databases and software code used by the forum, so you can never assume that your PMs are private, even if he claims he will never read them. Taking this into account, you should never discuss sensitive information through your PMs. Use a proper encrypted solution for that.
The privacy section of the forum also encourage encrypting sensitive PM, which means these personal messages can be accessed.

Quote
Always encrypt sensitive PMs. Note also that PMs are often emailed in cleartext to the recipients by bitcointalk.org
https://bitcointalk.org/privacy.php

The warning is clear, "If you don't want anybody to know about what you want to communicate, don't use the forum". Any confidential matter should be handled in more secured or private channels outside the forum
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 701


I don't think members have ever taught about this before which I why I decided to raise this thread.
 Although I recognize that the intention behind granting this access might be to counter spam and fraudulent behavior, I personally find the idea of reading other people's private messages invasive. PMs are meant to be personal, and it's troubling to think that anyone apart from the intended recipients or sender can access them.
It’s common knowledge and I’m surprised this is new to you. At the bottom of the message box, you will see this important note.

“Note: PM privacy is not guaranteed. Encrypt sensitive messages.”

I don’t see a problem with the admin having access to pms, if you are not comfortable you can always take your sensitive conversations elsewhere. Telegram has a in built feature that supports encrypted messages
staff
Activity: 3276
Merit: 4111
As for personal messages which are reported; I don't know what personal message reports look like exactly, however it might be worth considering removing who reported it, so that at least prevents the moderator knowing whom it was too, unless it was otherwise stated in the personal message. However, that might be the default behaviour, I wouldn't know.

However, without reports from personal messages; problematic users could maliciously or send unsolicited personal messages which could potentially harm other users.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 672
Top Crypto Casino
Yes, the administrators can access anything on the forum because they have the access to everything. The administrator can read private messages between two users and he/she can also access those messages even if a user deletes those messages after the conversation. The administrator is the most powerful entity of a forum or site and he/she has access to all the permissions and functions of a site.

The moderators might not have that many privileges and they may not be able to access the private messages on a forum, but that also depends on the structure of a forum if the admin of a forum decides to grant such permissions to moderators then they will also be able to access those private messages between two users. In most of the forums only admin is the central authority that can access or change anything in a forum without anyone's permissions while moderators may hold high privileges than other users, but still they have limited permissions as compare to an admin.

I would still recommend you to avoid sending any messages that may violate the rules of the forum because sending of such messages isn't a good act and if admins may later found such messages then they may take strict actions against such users who violate the terms and conditions of the forum. There are some strict rules of this forum which every user has to follow despite of their status or activity level, and anyone if breaks those rules then those users may face hard times on this forum. But, if a user follows the rules and doesn't do anything that's against the rules of the forum then there won't be any problem for such users.
 
sr. member
Activity: 1232
Merit: 475
#SWGT CERTIK Audited
The topic is quite interest to read as i also had these type of questions in my mind but i never tried to think more about these. Because reasons is, i do not have anything personal to share on PMs that i should avoid to send. If i have to give some contact of me then i prefer to use TG and we all know how secure they are.

But, few days back I had an encounter in my Local board where our board moderator Xalolex edited one of ours local member's post and i was stunned to see that but Xalolex is a nice and friendly moderator he edited the post to correct the mistake made by the member and he also gave whole clarification of the matter after asking. Because I got curious so I asked him/her and he replied politely i am really impressed.

Well, coming back to the discussion, he said, yeah we have permission to read and modify user's posts but he did not mentioned any PMs details but i doubt that these moderators are given the access to PMs because PMs access is something personal and it would be in the hand of Administrator only which is Theymos and I do not know anyone else here who would have access to PMs.
staff
Activity: 2408
Merit: 2021
I find your lack of faith in Bitcoin disturbing.
You've already found all the answers to your questions.
After that, on a forum (or any other form of communication on internet), if you don't trust the admin, don't use the forum or don't send a PM.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 638
Being an administrator is different from being a moderator, and their access is also not the same.
As your quoted moderator has already stated, Accessing the message is only possible when the person you send the message to reports it over to the moderators for any reason (scam or privacy violation). Reporting a message to the moderators will definitely give them a preview of the message reported so that they can pass a proper judgment on the matter.

But on the side of the administrator, I think he has access to almost everything, unless this forum is not built that way. If not, administrators have access to whatever information they want. But this forum might be different since privacy is highly respected here on the forum, and the Admin is also too busy with other things to go through users personal messages.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
While moderators may not access the PM but administrator can read PMs. The forum software does not encrypt the message to store in the database which means anyone who have database access can also read messages between users.
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 6830
theymos has complete access to all databases and software code used by the forum, so you can never assume that your PMs are private, even if he claims he will never read them. Taking this into account, you should never discuss sensitive information through your PMs. Use a proper encrypted solution for that.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 365
The Alliance Of Bitcointalk Translators - ENG>PID
On reading through this thread made by ,rachael9385 I came across a puzzling statement that has left me wondering about the privacy of personal messages.
In a response by Solosanz  it was mentioned 
Personal message is private and AFAIK only the administrators can view every users' personal message, since he's not an administrator, he can't scrap personal message.

This statement raised several questions and prompted me to initiate this thread. I delved into some research and found a few older posts where moderators weighed in on the matter. According to a post by Quickseller
Any administrator has the ability to read arbitrary PM's between users, even if they are not reported.
It has been said this will not happen without the consent of at least one of the parties of a message, and I have not seen evidence that contradicts this.

I also came across another reply by hilariousandco
No, we can't directly read PMs, just ones that are reported directly to us. You can send your ref link if it's warranted, but if not and they report the message you'll be banned for unsolicited pm spam

I don't think members have ever taught about this before which I why I decided to raise this thread.
 Although I recognize that the intention behind granting this access might be to counter spam and fraudulent behavior, I personally find the idea of reading other people's private messages invasive. PMs are meant to be personal, and it's troubling to think that anyone apart from the intended recipients or sender can access them.

I know this thread might not make much of sence,  but I understand the need for this discussion and hope to hear from moderators or individuals who can shed light on this matter.

(Please refrain from unnecessary responses.)
Pages:
Jump to: