Pages:
Author

Topic: Prohibiting Newbies from creating threads in Off Topic and Politics & Society (Read 417 times)

sr. member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 262
I also agree.
a thread about off topic should not exist because it only raises the debate.
but we have to find a solution of all that how to make our future progress

thats the thing many users who has an alt account will create new account and then will post a new topic that is truly a nonsense , and i see that not only on that thread but also on most of the topic here in the forum to avoid the non sense topic . In fact sometimes those non sense topic has the most reply .
full member
Activity: 420
Merit: 171
I think the reason why they do that it's because for the additional activity to their acount, day by day this forum has new topic it's either nonsense or educative but shit threads are in there. So theymos is adjusting the algorithm of this site, and moderators are always experiencing headache, also DT members are blamed saying that they abuse the trust but they are actually doing right.
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 3061
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
All threads posted in Politics & Society by the same user:

SOLO PARENT, who do you value most , your lover or your child?

My child is flesh of my flesh, same blood that runs over  me, my child is my life, my everything, the reason of my existence. Its a GIFT from God.


Coffee ? Tea ? Or .....

Of course Tea and me ... Me to drink tea for a healthy lifestyle.  With all the benefits I am getting from it

Water or Softdrinks

Water provides us all health benefits, sodas on the other hand develops unhealthy stuff to our body..

Love songs makes me ....

Love songs makes me fall inlove and being love all the time

Lower ranks need to be prohibited from posting in there and off topic. Removing signatures from ranks will put a stop to this because this user is only posting in there to farm up their account so they can join a campaign. If we're not going to go with a 'pay to play' scheme then why not merit/point based system like theymos suggested. Shitposters would never make it if that was the case.
legendary
Activity: 2383
Merit: 1551
dogs are cute.
So can we restrict lower ranked accounts from these two boards? I don't see any good reason why we should allow them to post in there straight away as it just leads to tonnes of shitposting farming on daily basis.
What happened to the discussion where people were like create a board for spammers and shit posters to spam? Has theymos mentioned anything about it in the staff board? I don't legit users have a problem against this, except for this point made by quickseller :-
The politics section I more complicated because it is well political. Restricting the politics section would reduce the forums protection of free speech which is something I know theymos greatly values.
Theymos really respects integrity of all the users and he truly believes in usage of free speech, so if theymos finds it against his will, he won't do so.
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 3061
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
So can we restrict lower ranked accounts from these two boards? I don't see any good reason why we should allow them to post in there straight away as it just leads to tonnes of shitposting farming on daily basis.

Here's another user who signed up today and heads straight into Off Topic to create the same spam threads that have been posted half a dozen times before:

Gaming

Which is your favorite game...

Love

In which age you fall in love Grin

Coffee or tea

Coffee or tea, which one you prefer  Roll Eyes

Same old story. Some kid from a developing nation has just found out you can earn here and heads straight into off topic to start his farming spree. Charging for a signature would be an even better solution to this issue and would probably stop people like this guy from even signing up in the first place or without at least investing some time and money into bitcoin first which would certainly sort the wheat from the chaff.
sr. member
Activity: 321
Merit: 251
I also agree.
a thread about off topic should not exist because it only raises the debate.
but we have to find a solution of all that how to make our future progress
Your post history is not better than spammer / 1 line poster in off-topic the difference is you post in altcoin board.

thanks infonya
I also have never had transactions in myetherwallet.
one GAS is enough for how many times the transaction?
and you even didn't check your google translate sentence.

maybe DT member can give shitposter or spammer a red trust so it can decrease the farming account population
member
Activity: 308
Merit: 10
I also agree.
a thread about off topic should not exist because it only raises the debate.
but we have to find a solution of all that how to make our future progress
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 3061
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Yes, it's being enforced but I am only one person and it's a losing battle. How can I keep up with sig spammers creating and farming hundreds of accounts? I can't. It's a waste of time without other restrictions put into place because it's like trying to save a sinking ship.
Dude, if you're giving up then I'm going to stop reporting shitposters.  I won't waste my time, but I am tagging them when I see them.  

I agree, it's a monumental, thankless task and change needs to come from theymos, but he seems to be too fucking blind to how lousy bitcointalk has become.  It's pretty sad, but I'm sure he's not the one shedding any tears.  This place is his personal gold mine.

Whether you want to stop reporting them is up to you but sadly nothing being done at an admin level about the numerous issues this board has just has a knock on effect with many people giving up on both sides because it's essentially futile and a waste of time. Users reporting and staff subsequently banning a handful of shitposters every day doesn't really do anything when we're not tackling the root cause of the issue which is the campaigns. As long as they can get away with doing nothing then why would they change?  

Also, I don't really buy how theymos is personally profiting off these issues though. Any active staff member currently earns more money from moderating than he does. If theymos wanted to earn more money from this forum he could do so in numerous ways. I've personally suggested multiple ways the forum could be better monetised with simple things like a premium banner at the top of a few of the more popular sub boards (bitcoin discussion, gambling etc). I've even suggested if he doesn't trust anyone else to be an admin then he should just consider paying himself a reasonable wage and do forum admin duties full time because one is badly needed. Removing signatures from ranks and charging people to have them would also easily bring in tens if not hundreds of thousands in forum income a year. I think the lack of change or action regarding issues is simply down to him not having time and possibly worries about how restrictions will effect the traffic here more than it is to do with money (I'm sure he's doing alright for coins and cash).

legendary
Activity: 3528
Merit: 7005
Top Crypto Casino
Yes, it's being enforced but I am only one person and it's a losing battle. How can I keep up with sig spammers creating and farming hundreds of accounts? I can't. It's a waste of time without other restrictions put into place because it's like trying to save a sinking ship.
Dude, if you're giving up then I'm going to stop reporting shitposters.  I won't waste my time, but I am tagging them when I see them. 

I agree, it's a monumental, thankless task and change needs to come from theymos, but he seems to be too fucking blind to how lousy bitcointalk has become.  It's pretty sad, but I'm sure he's not the one shedding any tears.  This place is his personal gold mine.
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
How about not having a politics and society board at all? Only a few users find it useful, others just spam there. Adding to off-topic, politics and society, gambling, I'd like to add the alternative currencies section - > especially the giveaway and bounty along with the Announcements boards respectively to be the boards which do not add to the activity . Bring back the newbie jail for even better cause, I read what saltyspoon had to say on this, but with differentiated rules which someone suggested in a different thread, a huge amount of spam can be reduced. Have a test for campaign managers if they pass, they can manage, if not, tell them to fuck off.

Well personally I find it very interesting since I mostly post there but as I said, I do agree that there is a ton of spam. I just feel like the best solution to kill spammers for good without worrying about a specific section or specific threads is to enforce strict signature campaign rules. That's the easiest and fastest solution. No one would spam the off-topic section with crap if they knew they wont get accepted in any signature campaign because of their post quality.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
I would reject your proposal to restrict new(er) users from creating threads in off topic. I suspect that low level accounts cost fairly little and it would be more or less trivial to purchase a sufficiently high level account to create these kinds of shit threads. I also don’t think it is the threads themselves that cause issues but rather are the shit replies that cause issues - for example someone could buy one account to create 50 shit threads and subsequently use those threads to farm many accounts they create themselves.

Restricting low level accounts from posting in off topic would be a different story. If many accounts are being farmed in the off topic section then I don’t see a major issue with restricting these users from posting here. Off topic is, by definition not bitcoin related so I don’t think anyone will join bitcointalk to post in off topic, so this will not realistically turn anyone away.

I might go a step further and either remove off topic or significantly restrict what can be posted there. The vast majority of what is posted is shot and adds very little to the community.

The politics section I more complicated because it is well political. Restricting the politics section would reduce the forums protection of free speech which is something I know theymos greatly values.
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 3061
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
I wouldn't be against those boards not counting towards activity either but there are also plenty of other boards that would then also meet the criteria such as Gambling Discussion (which is basically a board that was created due to shitposters being 'forced' by the signature campaigns to make x amount of posts in Gambling, hence why they started created threads to talk about every possible league and tournament of sport that is ever played. Either I'd be fine with but it might be easier just to prohibit certain ranks from posting as that's already happened in certain boards (the "Other languages" board for example where it's now not allowed for ranks lower than Senior to create threads there due to all the spam). As I said before as well, people can still have decent discussions in there but it's all the newbies that have drowned that out.
I too believe Gambling Discussion should be added to the no activity counted list.  

You might as well just get rid of it in this case as 99% of people only post in there because of signature campaigns. There wasn't even any topics on sports in there until certain campaigns implemented rules where you needed to make a minimum x amount of posts in the Gambling section a month to collect payment. People obviously struggled with this so they just started creating threads to discuss sports in any capacity so they could to hit their quota. If it's removed from post count then it would be redundant as a board altogether as nobody is going to waste time talking about sports if there's no financial benefit for them.

I think some of these threads really tell you the age of users signing up here and dozens of them are created every day and are immediately swarmed by shitposters frothing at another thread they can easily post in.
Can't you use this as a honey pot for spammers? Let a thread be for a while, then have a look at the recent posts of everybody who posted in that thread, and ban like 98% of them?

I already do this but I can spend hours a day doing it and it barely makes a dent. Creating one of the spam threads above will get you banned if all your posts are the same but opening one of them up to check posts is like going down a rabbit hole of spammers because it's dozens of accounts creating dozens of threads. You check one users post history alone and 99%-100% of their posts are in spammy off topic threads and you then find new spam threads they've posted in or created that you've missed and you open them up and then find hundreds more accounts in each thread doing the same and it just spirals on deeper and deeper.

Off-topic has a sticky thread: Low quality topics and posts are not allowed:
Quote
Off topic is a section for any other topics that do not fit into any other sub, however, it is not a subforum for account farmers to lazily spam their way through the ranks and doing so will no longer be tolerated. If you are caught spamming unsubstantial posts just to farm or rank up your account your account(s) will be immediately permabanned without warning.
~
If all your posts are short and spammy and it is clear you are only making them for either signature payment or to farm then you will still be banned.
Is this currently being enforced? I see so many users with only worthless posts in these sections and the Altcoin threads.

Yes, it's being enforced but I am only one person and it's a losing battle. How can I keep up with sig spammers creating and farming hundreds of accounts? I can't. It's a waste of time without other restrictions put into place because it's like trying to save a sinking ship.
member
Activity: 532
Merit: 10
Your article has a great investment. I support your opinion on these meaningless posts, but do not ban all the newbies discussed in Off Topic and Politics & Society. We should just ban the posts really meaningless as you set out above. Because newbies will not understand much about bitcoin so they have to go through these topics to find out what the bitcoin forum is and how bitcoin is. I think Off Topic and Politics & Society are 2 topics needed for newbies.
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1065
✋(▀Ĺ̯ ▀-͠ )
How about not having a politics and society board at all? Only a few users find it useful, others just spam there.

Removing the jungle and merge it with off-topic is a good solution that i suggested in the past tho...

Adding to off-topic, politics and society, gambling, I'd like to add the alternative currencies section - > especially the giveaway and bounty along with the Announcements boards respectively to be the boards which do not add to the activity .

No, i don't support the idea of boards without activity, finding a way to limit the number of counted posts per period in some specific boards is better.
For example : making more than 5 posts per period in off-topic (the jungle merged with it) will grant you a maximum of 5 activities only.

Bring back the newbie jail for even better cause, I read what saltyspoon had to say on this, but with differentiated rules which someone suggested in a different thread, a huge amount of spam can be reduced. Have a test for campaign managers if they pass, they can manage, if not, tell them to fuck off.
Neutral with these ideas.
Forcing an escrow and a manager (same person or 2) for every signature campaign and bounties will :
1- reduce spam
2- reduce scam in our forums...
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
I think some of these threads really tell you the age of users signing up here and dozens of them are created every day and are immediately swarmed by shitposters frothing at another thread they can easily post in.
Can't you use this as a honey pot for spammers? Let a thread be for a while, then have a look at the recent posts of everybody who posted in that thread, and ban like 98% of them?
It would probably be possible to use a bot: all accounts with more than 5 out of their first 10 posts on those boards are very likely insubstantial posters.

I'm afraid restricting them from these sections just moves their spam to other boards. Other than that, I am in favour of making off-topic and politics boards only accessible to high-ranking members.
I'd love to see them all banned before they level up and turn to different sections of the forum, but I also expect they'll just create 10 other accounts after the first ones are banned.

Off-topic has a sticky thread: Low quality topics and posts are not allowed:
I support that proposal but don’t you think that wouldn’t be a problem if sig. campaigns managers didn’t hire such bullshit posters?
Would it be an option to only allow signature campaigns to pay in Bitcoin (or also altcoins with an established value), and ban all campaigns that pay in "tokens"? Most spam comes from the ICO and bounty hunters who have hundreds of spammers in their campaign.



I barely post in off-topic, and try to stay away from politics, but when I check the post history from someone who posts rubbish, I often end up in those threads filled with garbage posts.
I've been reporting so many posts lately that I run into the "only once every 4 seconds"-limit all the time, the amount of spam is endless!
legendary
Activity: 2383
Merit: 1551
dogs are cute.
How about not having a politics and society board at all? Only a few users find it useful, others just spam there. Adding to off-topic, politics and society, gambling, I'd like to add the alternative currencies section - > especially the giveaway and bounty along with the Announcements boards respectively to be the boards which do not add to the activity . Bring back the newbie jail for even better cause, I read what saltyspoon had to say on this, but with differentiated rules which someone suggested in a different thread, a huge amount of spam can be reduced. Have a test for campaign managers if they pass, they can manage, if not, tell them to fuck off.
staff
Activity: 3304
Merit: 4115
I wouldn't be against those boards not counting towards activity either but there are also plenty of other boards that would then also meet the criteria such as Gambling Discussion (which is basically a board that was created due to shitposters being 'forced' by the signature campaigns to make x amount of posts in Gambling, hence why they started created threads to talk about every possible league and tournament of sport that is ever played. Either I'd be fine with but it might be easier just to prohibit certain ranks from posting as that's already happened in certain boards (the "Other languages" board for example where it's now not allowed for ranks lower than Senior to create threads there due to all the spam). As I said before as well, people can still have decent discussions in there but it's all the newbies that have drowned that out.
I too believe Gambling Discussion should be added to the no activity counted list. I can't comment on the local sections, but it seems there's already measures there to prevent spam. Possibly adding it to the Alt coin annoucement/bountie threads could prove beneficial. A lot of accounts are posting utter rubbish there as you know and not all of them are low ranked members either.
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
+1
I even suggested a more radical (and painful Tongue) measure (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/prohibiting-newbies-from-starting-a-topic-2467866)

Meh, wouldn't solve much. Sure it's not bad to have it but they will just spam existing threads like they already do and there are so many high rank accounts already that new topics will just keep coming. I still feel like the best way to stop it is having strict campaign managers. Also the new bounty section has a ton of signature campaigns that are basically un-moderated.
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1065
✋(▀Ĺ̯ ▀-͠ )
copper member
Activity: 2940
Merit: 4101
Top Crypto Casino
Not only it shouldn't count towards activity but it should be deleted directly. While I understand the administration wanted to make the boards to allow members to talk about something else than cryptos it's not topics that have a place in the Bitcoin forum.

There are some interesting discussions that can take place, but to be sincere how do you want to talk politic with teenagers
 See, they prefer batman VS ironman
Pages:
Jump to: