Insert Quote
Right now there seems to be two efforts that I know of working on a P2P Exchange. It seems like Project Holy Grail is much further along than Project Invictus.
Project Invictus:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/announcing-project-invictus-a-p2p-exchange-collaboration-229315Project Holy Grail:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/holy-grail-bounty-225954I just wanted to hear your thoughts about why Project Invictus would succeed over Project Holy Grail or vice versa.
Project Invictus is still working on gathering requirements with little or no direction in coding. The lead seems to tackle the problem from a business perspective.
Project Holy Grail already has bounties in place for the coding of the exchange with screenshots of some of the GUI components.
What I really want to know is why the lead of Project Invictus will succeed over project Holy Grail, since the latter has a larger head start. Are you there?
When I first started Project Invictus it was with a totally neutral stance on existing projects. Our first goal was to properly define a p2p decentralized exchange whose purpose was to allow for faster and more global fiat to crypto-currency transactions without the need for trust and a better escrow system than apparent with current incumbents. So why did we want to do this? To make your Bitcoins better by reducing market volatility and significantly increasing liquidity.
So it all started with the Invictus thread and I had an opportunity to meet a lot of the brightest minds in the Bitcoin community; however, one in particular stood out as especially unique and forward thinking- Bytemaster. Daniel developed the kernel of what was necessary to accomplish my original goal and was willing to invest his own money and time in correcting misconceptions about his own designs prior to ever meeting me. That's a rare quality and it told me we could work together to transform BitShares into the system capable of what was needed.
Over the many 80 hour weeks, we've grown considerably from just a collection of hopes and ideas to a fully VC funded corporation in the state of Virginia that is now actually writing the source code to implement our new ecosystem. While we have no intention to operate in silent mode, we have to be careful about expectation management and also refine our launch strategy for this revolutionary (and it really is) open sourced protocol. Thus we'll be scare on the details for now, but both Daniel and I will be presenting our protocol and some of its source code to the world in October at C3 where we are invited speakers. Until then enjoy the whitepaper- which you'll notice has evolved quite a bit- and hang tight.
I will say a few more things before I leave:
BitShares is not an altcoin competing with Bitcoin, but rather a metacurrency to support a new kind of digital asset.
BitShares does not seek to replace conventional Bitcoin exchanges, but rather link them together and significantly enhance their functionality.
BitShares will allow for easy person to person trading similar to Local Bitcoins, but much faster and safer
BitShares is very altcoin friendly and will eventually allow other currencies like Litecoin and Feathercoin to trade without the need of a central exchange.
BitShares will be like crack for Wall Street and drive significant mainstream adoption of crypto-currencies to the financial sector benefiting all CC in the regulatory and legal spectrum.
Those that use BitShares are not to the best of our knowledge using bearer bonds or acting as money transmitters.
Stay tuned for our many bounty campaigns coming soon.
Charles
CEO of Invictus Innovations Inc.
Decentralized Solutions to Centralized Problems