Pages:
Author

Topic: Project Invictus Vs. Project Holy Grail - page 3. (Read 3674 times)

hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 566
fractally
July 09, 2013, 03:09:28 PM
#2
Project Invictus just formed Invictus Innovations, Inc and is very well capitalized.   I am the CTO and have just started full time development and we are in the process of looking to hire the best tallent in the Bitcoin community for 2 or 3 more full time positions.    If you have skills and experience in C++ / bitcoin please contact me.

At the moment we have 3 people working on this full time and have an order of magnitude more funding than Project Holy Grail.     We will be making more announcements in the near future with multiple product releases scheduled over the next 6 months.
legendary
Activity: 1304
Merit: 1015
July 09, 2013, 12:58:42 PM
#1
Right now there seems to be two efforts that I know of working on a P2P Exchange.  It seems like Project Holy Grail is much further along than Project Invictus.

Project Invictus: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/announcing-project-invictus-a-p2p-exchange-collaboration-229315
Project Holy Grail: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/holy-grail-bounty-225954

I just wanted to hear your thoughts about why Project Invictus would succeed over Project Holy Grail or vice versa.

Project Invictus is still working on gathering requirements with little or no direction in coding.  The lead seems to tackle the problem from a business perspective.

Project Holy Grail already has bounties in place for the coding of the exchange with screenshots of some of the GUI components.

What I really want to know is why the lead of Project Invictus will succeed over project Holy Grail, since the latter has a larger head start.  Are you there?
Pages:
Jump to: