Topic: Project without team members - page 21. (Read 2896 times)
Unfortunately project which not disclose team members it is scam project in most cases. But not in all cases. Bitcoin has not disclosed team members as well, but project is successful
personally, as long as I become a bounty hunter I always follow a project that has a team, because I am more believe in a project that has a team. I think with the team then the plan of a project will also be easier to develop. besides, with a team then the promotion will also larger.
A project without a team member. It's not necessarily a fraud. Contrary. A project with a team member. It's not necessarily a real project. We can not judge the true or false of a project simply by team members. We need a multifaceted judgment.
With the recent conditions, if a project comes without a team or whitepaper definitely it could be a scam. That's only my personal opinion. But how can a project be developed without a team ?
Hello, I'm not really sure to recommend the projects without team members. Whatever the project, we should know who are behind the project. If a project doesn't introduce their team member on the website, one-pager, community, and also thread, I think that we cannot trust it as well. It is better to be more careful on it.
If the project does not have team members how it was developed then? someone must be in charge, now with the whitepaper they may not have it in the ICO announcement but it should be in their project or on the roadmap and get it out as soon as possible, because the ICO has to be as legitimate as possible to attract investors and achieve the necessary collection for development costs, if an ICO fails in these requirements I do not mean that it is a scam but probably will not get anywhere.
I don't want to see the project without team members. I don't have any idea about it. Under normal circumstances, there is a scam. We need to calmly think about many problems and don't be deceived.
I think investors will doubt their project if there is no team behind it. how it will develop if they are not team members. if they are founders can be developed but can not maximize development. So the success of most of his team projects that always work compact, complementary.
The project will not be successful without best team member, the team member is the one who to show to the investors and the community in order the project to meet for the whole world and many of them are they going to invest the project.
I think a project that has many team members can also fail, how about a project without a team? the failure of a project could be due by lack of promotion by the team, so that not many investors know about the project. therefore, it takes a team that can handles the project in order that the project can be better known to investors and the project will be successful.
I have several times come across a project without an obvious member of the team and it's a scam. but this is not a guarantee because some also say there are successful. but better seek safe haven just off on taking risks. in fact, the project too much and could certainly make a lot of choices when there is indeed a dubious then could choose the other.
Any task that doesn't have colleagues or doesn't show their group profile on their site is anything but a decent one, better keep running with your cash, such ico will guarantee you huge reward, yet don't get bulldozed by it, simply proceed onward to the following ico.
Many of the privacy coins have an unknown team, but it does not turn out to be a scam. But if the project without a team seems a bit dubious, you should research to find out as much information before deciding to follow it.
Project without a team a pure scam. But there are such like that? i doubt it. even a scammers have s team to make it look like legit.
If a project cannot present a team and a white paper no one will invest on it.
If a project cannot present a team and a white paper no one will invest on it.
If a project is to be built and does not have a team then what kind of project will be launched? Odd if any project that does not have a team does not even have a concept at all, obviously it can all be said to be a mere fraud because it only expects the investor to deliver some of its assets to an empty token with no value whatsoever. . If I find such a thing then I have passed the project.
A project with no team member is surely a failure right from the start and i do not think such project can achieve it aim and objective
Projects without an understandable Whitepaper or a good Team is likely to be a scam, The total numbers of Projects i came across have great teams, with an excellent all- round whitepaper.
In my opinion there really is a possibility that a project without known team members are potential scam. Potential because there are many great coins out there that does not have any team or the team basically is anonymous but it has a following and bitcoin is an example of such coin. Nobody knows who Satoshi is yet many buy the said coin. Now that is efficiency.
Great example which does really make a potential thing which we cant really directly generalized. There are lots of coins which do have anonymous devs but I'm quite sure that they are composed of some members yet each do have significant role when it comes to the development of a certain coin. Doing it alone is not possible even though they are not known but we can presume that project do have different hands and minds even though its anonymous but it did able to succeed because of community support.
There are just some few ICO or crypto that has no team and became success . Apparently almost all investors and trader will look into it to see if the team is capable of doing the project successful .
In my opinion there really is a possibility that a project without known team members are potential scam. Potential because there are many great coins out there that does not have any team or the team basically is anonymous but it has a following and bitcoin is an example of such coin. Nobody knows who Satoshi is yet many buy the said coin. Now that is efficiency.
Great example which does really make a potential thing which we cant really directly generalized. There are lots of coins which do have anonymous devs but I'm quite sure that they are composed of some members yet each do have significant role when it comes to the development of a certain coin. Doing it alone is not possible even though they are not known but we can presume that project do have different hands and minds even though its anonymous but it did able to succeed because of community support. Jump to: