Topic: Prolonged border closure - page 2. (Read 345 times)

this is the proposed plan.

so to put it into example.
if your thinking of go from UK to disneyland paris and fee you will be free to walk around and mingle and join the queues to go on the rides... FORGET IT
however if you want an all inclusive holiday staying on the compound of a hotel. maybe

but generally dont expect to be able to go abroad and roam free for a 2 week vacation
so dont hope for much tourism unless hotels start to provide 'lock-in all inclusive' holiday packages


many sports like football(soccer) are planning to instead of having international game where people dot about into different places each day. they do all european football matches in one country where the football players stay in the neighbouring hotel for the duration of the season. to avoid racing around different countries
yep as far back as 2012 they planned to have 12 nations hosting euro 2020 but now the plan seems to be more likely to be one nation hosting all matches

I don't think there will be any problems, as long as the products and services can cross borders. Personally I have my family spread over two continents and 4 countries, some I haven't been able to see for years for different reasons, and that doesn't make me crazy or depressed.

If you feel that you are starting to go crazy in self-insulation, try to communicate more with relatives or friends on Skype. This way you can distract yourself from the thought of loneliness and remember that we are all in the same boat now and sooner or later it will end.

Banning all flights and vehicles in times of pandemic prevents spreading of the virus but it will also isolate all outside help for example if some country has medical kits to donate they would not be able to deliver especially if the virus gets prolonged to 1-2 years and still vaccine still hasn't been created it would damage a country's economy.

It makes sense that once the spread of the virus is under control in an area that barriers are then established to isolate that area. In practice this is simplest at a national level, because we have national governments. Nations with a federal structure, US for example, can perhaps do so at the state level. In certain cases, and dependent on local geography and politics, these areas can then later be widened, thinking about a single Australia/New Zealand zone for example.

But closing of borders doesn't have to mean no entry, it can - and likely will - just mean quarantining. Any people coming in from an area where the virus is still rampant will need to be quarantined for a period of time (a couple of weeks is I think what China is using) to ensure they are virus-free when they enter. For goods/produce coming in from abroad, there will likely be strict decontamination procedures.

Border closure seems prudent to me. It may cause delays in physical cross-border business, it may severely hamper the transport of perishable goods (especially foodstuffs and certain medicines), and it will likely mean huge reductions in international travel of people, but in the absence of both a vaccine and - crucially - the capability and willingness to administer such a vaccine globally, then border restrictions are an obvious and sound defensive strategy.

So long as some part of the world has the virus, everyone is vulnerable. We all need to work together. Whilst there is always huge opposition to any idea of supranational governance (hello the EU), those concerns now need to be put aside. It has been demonstrated many times that we will not work together out of any sense of moral duty or compassion to less fortunate nations, but we now find ourselves in the strange situation of being compelled to work together out of basic self-interest.

What about the import and export? If borders are closed then imagine the life living in a country like North Korea.

They may stop immigrants into ther country which give issues related to employment, tax, tourism,...

People are used to freedom already and suddenly this isolation to each other will really lead to insanity.  Border closure has this affect too.
Right now I am only talking to this indoor plant I have. It started yesterday but its only reply was shhhss everytime the wind blows. Give it another week I may be able to post videos here while twerking.

Hope to really return to normal. I don't mind not having a bullrun as long as things normalize. would you AGREE?  

I misspelled it. In my opinion, every person needs freedom of movement per se without any restrictions and if a person is deprived of this freedom for a long time it can cause many psychological diseases. Neither Internet, nor TV could yet replace a trip to the sea or a rest in a medical and preventive sanatorium.

I don't even think that border closure is going to be an issue when discussing the problem of people feeling isolated from one another. The real issue is social distancing and mandatory quarantine -- that's the culprit in the dilemma you've drawn up. I support social distancing and quarantine though, people should stay away from one another to ensure that we're done with this virus ASAP instead of prolonging this and killing more people in the process.


Ugh -- what? The US isn't a country that is restricing the news, social media, etc. You're still going to be able to know what is going on in the world and be able to connect with people online. It's a different world but it's only for a little while and we'll be able to recover if we all do our part.

Most likely, this life will resemble life in the Soviet Union during the Iron Curtain. Many people can no longer withstand the restrictions on movement, although not much time has passed. If this regime continues for a year or more, many people will simply go crazy.

There won't be a problem for countries; there will be problems for people wanting to immigrate. The argument people make for open borders is that open boarders should exist to promote free exchange of labor meaning unrestricted job access. This pandemic is a clear example of why unrestricted immigration is an issue.  Immigration from India to the U.S. is the most classic example of immigration screening based on specialized skills and this is the reason you see jobs in silicon valley dominated by Indians along with other technology sectors. If the U.S. has an abysmal unemployment rate, it's in their best interest to limit immigration to ensure U.S. citizens don't have a further competitive job market.

What are the main problems that may arise if all countries close (or almost close) their borders for 1-2 years or more?

Fortunately, it cannot be said that some kind of isolation is felt now, because we can easily call (Skype) a person who lives in another country.
But what problems can arise?