may tspacepilot run the speech algo thing that proved that QS and Panther are the same people on both accounts too?
It actually didn't prove but suggested the high probablity of them being the same person. And if I am reading the OP correctly pete is supposed to be really angry kind of guy, and BPB a sweet guy, I think they will turn negative on the test. And I've seen many of BPB's posts, most seem to be one-liner or short posts unlike posts QS makes, big long boring posts. 
Topic: Proof that Quickseller is BiPolarBob/PistolPete AND intended to SCAM! - page 7. (Read 7614 times)
September 16, 2015, 06:31:52 AM
September 16, 2015, 06:22:50 AM
may tspacepilot run the speech algo thing that proved that QS and Panther are the same people on both accounts too?
September 16, 2015, 05:59:05 AM
In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's money
Not if you are working a minimum wage job (like at CVS Pharmacy) as a low level supervisor which gives you access to a web enabled computer during work hours.
This allows you to scam while you are at work.BTW - Nothing the OP has posted is proof. Just coincidence.
You would know. That's what your Linkedin profile says.
SMILE---Just think it's all funny
September 16, 2015, 01:16:16 AM
In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's money
Not if you are working a minimum wage job (like at CVS Pharmacy) as a low level supervisor which gives you access to a web enabled computer during work hours.
This allows you to scam while you are at work.BTW - Nothing the OP has posted is proof. Just coincidence.
The experiment with language analysis, which tsacepilot ran was way more interesting and trustworthy (even though I still think it might be some sort of coincidence... I don't know that much about this topic, so...)
Give this guy a rest. He was already removed from default trust.
Some people just won't stop until the corpse is fully desecrated.
September 16, 2015, 12:08:30 AM
All I see here is speculation. A valid counter argument would be that those two accounts were created for completely different purposes. Quickseller was a default trust cowboy and bob was supposedly a persn wanting to do good and giving away money or gifts. TO believe that he would ROI from a single scam is kinda crazy IMO after he's been doing what he's doing for so long.
In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's moneyNotice in my previous mention of "long con" that I specified coins, not dollars at current exchange rates. That's a nice deflection, though. It was always about the coins for you. You're smart enough to know not to bottom sell two years into a downtrend. And we all know that 150BTC is a paltry sum for a widely trusted escrow.
September 15, 2015, 11:59:36 PM
All I see here is speculation. A valid counter argument would be that those two accounts were created for completely different purposes. Quickseller was a default trust cowboy and bob was supposedly a persn wanting to do good and giving away money or gifts. TO believe that he would ROI from a single scam is kinda crazy IMO after he's been doing what he's doing for so long.
In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's moneyNotice in my previous mention of "long con" that I specified coins, not dollars at current exchange rates. That's a nice deflection, though. It was always about the coins for you. You're smart enough to know not to bottom sell two years into a downtrend. And we all know that 150BTC is a paltry sum for a widely trusted escrow.
September 15, 2015, 10:48:05 PM
In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's money
Not if you are working a minimum wage job (like at CVS Pharmacy) as a low level supervisor which gives you access to a web enabled computer during work hours.
This allows you to scam while you are at work.BTW - Nothing the OP has posted is proof. Just coincidence.
You would know. That's what your Linkedin profile says.
e
k
t
September 15, 2015, 10:47:15 PM
In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's money
Not if you are working a minimum wage job (like at CVS Pharmacy) as a low level supervisor which gives you access to a web enabled computer during work hours.
This allows you to scam while you are at work.BTW - Nothing the OP has posted is proof. Just coincidence.
You would know. That's what your Linkedin profile says.
Hey - you're the one who threatened to sue me first.
September 15, 2015, 10:47:07 PM
In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's money
Not if you are working a minimum wage job (like at CVS Pharmacy) as a low level supervisor which gives you access to a web enabled computer during work hours.
This allows you to scam while you are at work.BTW - Nothing the OP has posted is proof. Just coincidence.
You would know. That's what your Linkedin profile says.
l
m
f
a
o
September 15, 2015, 10:45:49 PM
In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's money
Not if you are working a minimum wage job (like at CVS Pharmacy) as a low level supervisor which gives you access to a web enabled computer during work hours.
This allows you to scam while you are at work.BTW - Nothing the OP has posted is proof. Just coincidence.
You would know. That's what your Linkedin profile says.
September 15, 2015, 10:45:17 PM
In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's money
Not if you are working a minimum wage job (like at CVS Pharmacy) as a low level supervisor which gives you access to a web enabled computer during work hours.
This allows you to scam while you are at work.BTW - Nothing the OP has posted is proof. Just coincidence.
You would know. That's what your Linkedin profile says.
September 15, 2015, 10:44:21 PM
In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's money
Not if you are working a minimum wage job (like at CVS Pharmacy) as a low level supervisor which gives you access to a web enabled computer during work hours.
This allows you to scam while you are at work.BTW - Nothing the OP has posted is proof. Just coincidence.
September 15, 2015, 10:43:14 PM
In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's money
Not if you are working a minimum wage job (like at CVS Pharmacy) as a low level supervisor which gives you access to a web enabled computer during work hours.
This allows you to scam while you are at work.BTW - Nothing the OP has posted is proof. Just coincidence.
I'd consider it a strong accusation as it is quite clear that my claims have a high chance of being correct.
I believe you. They could be correct - certainly you think they are.
Coincidence will not hold up in court though. Not the same as QS lying outright "I am not Panthers52". Look for proof like that.
September 15, 2015, 10:42:07 PM
In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's money
Not if you are working a minimum wage job (like at CVS Pharmacy) as a low level supervisor which gives you access to a web enabled computer during work hours.
This allows you to scam while you are at work.BTW - Nothing the OP has posted is proof. Just coincidence.
Its easy to manage escrow/bitcointalk for hours a day after a regular job, in the morning at at night, could easily get more than 6 hours per day online even with a 10 hour work day, and a good sleep as well.
September 15, 2015, 10:40:40 PM
In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's money
Not if you are working a minimum wage job (like at CVS Pharmacy) as a low level supervisor which gives you access to a web enabled computer during work hours.
This allows you to scam while you are at work.BTW - Nothing the OP has posted is proof. Just coincidence.
I'd consider it a strong accusation as it is quite clear that my claims have a high chance of being correct.
September 15, 2015, 10:38:25 PM
In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's money
Not if you are working a minimum wage job (like at CVS Pharmacy) as a low level supervisor which gives you access to a web enabled computer during work hours.
This allows you to scam while you are at work.BTW - Nothing the OP has posted is proof. Just coincidence.
September 15, 2015, 10:37:36 PM
All I see here is speculation. A valid counter argument would be that those two accounts were created for completely different purposes. Quickseller was a default trust cowboy and bob was supposedly a persn wanting to do good and giving away money or gifts. TO believe that he would ROI from a single scam is kinda crazy IMO after he's been doing what he's doing for so long.
In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's moneyMinimum wage obviously isn't what most people lurking here are looking for but I sort of agree. Although I'm no supporter of you, I don't think that you have anything to do with BPB. And even if you were, I don't get how people see as something worthy of a scam accusation. Being someone that gives away money sounds like a compliment to me.
To put things in perspective, this amount would need to be more then double the amount of what Maidak is claimed to have stolen, including a $10,000 claimed theft that there is zero evidence of, and nearly 7x the amount of money that there is substantial evidence that Maidak had stolen. This is when I was making zero active efforts into holding increasingly larger amounts of other's money.
September 15, 2015, 10:36:41 PM
Amazing. Added into OP, great job helping
September 15, 2015, 10:36:35 PM
I believe that bipolarbob still paid back his "loans" after the whole QS drama flared up.
Of course he did. it's his only high-trust account left. He's gotta keep it looking good
Spot on
I loved your thread btw, just saw it now.Want an extra helping of irony? in his 'loans' he borrowed btc to buy trust from redsn0w. you can't make this shit up!
BUT... it happened!!!!!!!!
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12410140
And they give him green trust in return
i haven't seen one person say i was scammed by QS for xx amount so..... September 15, 2015, 10:32:54 PM
Jump to: