Do you think the winning effect causes the feeling of being invincible in the game? In many games, we use techniques, strategies, where you can find patterns, but the psychology we have in our brain is not accepting when we are losing, and we want to recover ... Is it a mistake to think this? Or should we assume the loss and come back at another time?
Many of these questions arise when we play, but we got a quick response and a solution: go ahead!
There are games like poker, where it is based on technique, cunning, psychology and luck. Some see it as a game full of attitude to deceive your opponents, others are experts with their techniques developed by experience.
When many players fall into vice, it is very difficult to control, some players end up losing everything, but you can apply the psychology of self-control.
For example: I enter the game with a certain balance, if I assume that this balance is totally lost, I can have two possibilities:
1.-As you know that this money you give for lost, you play without any pressure to see what happens, applying and giving free rein to your multiple strategies to see what results I can achieve.
2.- You play with the reason, waiting for you to recover your balance and multiply it.
I have applied this type of psychology always with option 1 and I play without stress. If I lose, I assume my loss, and if I win, it's like lifting a trophy. Do you think it's a way to escape from that little pressure that is exerted when playing? Have you ever applied this type of psychology?
In Poker, you need calm, strategy, experience, "poker face" that's why your strategy to get to table with mindset like "all i have here i can lose" might be useful.
In other games where you play against casino it does't makes any change because none of strategies actually works and all you relay on is pure luck. In fact the best strategy based on mathematics is to enter casino, bet all money on red and go home with 0 or double.