Topic: Put some Respeck On Craig Wright's name - page 2. (Read 2361 times)

Craig Wright should not be dismissed as some incompetent satoshi impostor, because that's what the social engineers at the BBC what you to believe. They want to discredit this guy until his word no longer holds any weight and has zero meaning. Which is only a danger to the rest of us because when Craig decides to really spill some beans and let us in on other intricate details - it'll be swept under the rug, and laughed off as a "hoax."

Not cool at all... especially when there are individuals here that have made millions due to the creation of this currency

Instead of defending the guy against "the establishment" that we're all supposed to hate... we join their tar and feathering party. Shows that some people here would rather continue to live under the thumb of their governments than to rebel in an authentic way.. and that's a shame

Ok you watched Zeitgeist. You wanna Bitcoin?

Just because it was "taught" doesn't make it the truth

Roman historians at the time of Jesus would disagree with you.
Jesus was written and talked about in real time and you can read those records in most libraries.
If he did not exist and was created after the fact, then Roman historians would not have written about him.
You clearly have not studied any of this besides watching youtube videos that don't stand up to scholarly review.
There was a person named Jesus of Nazareth at that time. Whether he was truly the messiah or such is not relevant.
What you are talking about with Egyptian mythology is partially correct, since the Jews took many Egyptian ideas
and customs since they were in captivity there for 300 years. But you aren't saying that.



No, the current bible was not commissioned by King James. He only commissioned the english translation.
The current bible (old testament & new testament) was commissioned by Constantine.
Actually, Adam comes from Hebrew of Adama, which is earth, since man was made of the clay.
That also stems back to Sumer, the supposed first civilization, where the term Adamu also meant clay/dirt.
What you are talking about is new age interpretation, and is not what was taught and understood for over 6000 years.



A simple google search would show that I am correct.


I'm not going to continue this conversation since it is off topic to your OP and
ultimately we disagree since I'm talking theology & history and you are talking new age-ry.
But I would advise you to widen your research. You are relying upon many interpretations
that have no original foundation or origins.

If you want to accept what you are saying is true, then you must ultimately accept that humans were
planted here by another race of beings, gave knowledge, we misinterpreted, forgot it all, and now start again.

If you accept that as all true, then there is no surprise now why you are making giant leaps that lead you to
believe that CSW is Satoshi Nakamoto.

I am respecting him but for doing such hoax and being a scammer. Better not to put respect to him. I will just give him wattamoto! Putting his feet to others shoes is not a good idea.

I heard that Craig Wright gets $1 in BTC any time his name is mentioned alongside Satoshi. Holy crap!! He's rich!! Well now he is anyways.

On a more serious note... Why does this matter in the slightest? Let's say he is Satoshi. Who cares? What difference does that make to you?

I will not have any respect to a Hoaxer, scammer and a Charlatan like this fake Wrightamoto!!

The story of Jesus is similar to the story of Horus... and the other "Sun deities."

Time itself is literally the tracking of the movement of the sun. .

Infact all of our energy comes from the sun, in indirect ways. Hence why we have a soul... soul being a variation of the word solar - hence solar energy

Horus is where the word hours comes from.. also the words horizon, horoscope etc

In egyptian mythology, Horus had an "evil" brother named Set... Hence, Sun-set

Look at the cues though... In the bible, jesus was a human being.. and referred to as the child of god, so therefore was a god. The bible perscribes the same "children of god" moniker as it does to Jesus himself.

So is Jesus a metaphor for the entire human race? Possibly so


It isn't metaphorical, nor is it romanticized.

The current bible was commissioned by King James IV, who was an illiterate.. and so hired mystics to write his version of the bible.

King James had to fight wars abroad and so didn't have the ability to place one of his soldiers on every street to manage the serfs, so the purpose of the bible was literally to control the minds of the populace - and promote self policing etc by propagation of alleged spiritual consequences for breaking the "ten commandments"

These mystics knew that if they were to reveal potent truths in the bible, they'd be murdered. So they were smart about it.

Very smart about it

Look at the story of Adam and Eve, in which it is said that God cut adam open and used one of his ribs to create Eve.

Well, the original name was not Adam, it was Atum... (u/o interchangeable) Atum = Atom. God cutting adam open to create Eve = the splitting of the Atom which is what creates energy.

The Bible is literally laced with science and truths, that you really have to decode


First time i've heard this... so can't pass opinion until I've done some research. But, it does ring true

During the days of the roman empire, the government were known for adding/subtracting entire months from the calendar to prolong their office terms

October... Oct = 8, yet october is the tenth month? Sept = 7, yet september is the ninth month?

So I can see this being true


Wrong see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3i6UwVkP6M

Not getting involved in your CSW is Satoshi thing. I disagree with your opinion.
But as to your statement quoted above.

1. Constantine, Roman Emperor change the Sabbath day from Saturday,
to Sunday by decree to "differentiate ourselves from the Jews". It was not
a fundamental teaching of Jesus or by early Christians.

2. When they speak of the Son in terms likened to the Sun/Light,
it is not purposefully interchangeable.It is metaphorical, and romanticized,
and from the early pagan religions. It was incorporated, but is not literal.
When certain books that were included into New Testament later, were written,
they understood Jesus to be God's Son in the spiritual and physical sense, they
did not mean that he was literal the Sun of our Solar System come down.

3. There were many more constellations then just 12 during Jesus's time and
most people knew that then. They probably had over 30 recognized constellations
that people all understood and agreed with, throughout the Roman Empire then.

4. The bright morning star is Lucifer, not Jesus. Lucifer was the light bearer in God's
Army before his fall.

5. Easter (Christian) comes from the Pagan Easter which celebrated seasonal rebirth.
Constantine, the Roman Emperor declared the Christian's Easter be on the same day as
the Pagan's in order to subvert the Pagan's holiday and ultimately dilute it over time.
Constantine was the first Roman Emperor to declare the Pagan Gods dead and wanted all
inhabitants of the Roman Emperor to convert to Christianity, as the official Roman religion.

Let's back up just a minute.... and sloooow it dooowwn. Let's slow it riiiight down and analyse these words that we say so frequently

By the way, "the man that knows something, knows that he knows nothing at all" im just so inquisitive that everything is a question, at least in my reality.

You say digital currencies are decentralised, and so cannot be controlled? How controllable is cash?  Is cash difficult to control because it is decentralised? No, not exactly, because cash is issued centrally. Yet the government wants to scrap cash entirely, to prevent bank runs.

Denmark is a testing ground for this: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/denmark-moves-closer-to-a-cashless-society-10231995.html

Here is the punchline: Denmark also has imposed, NEGATIVE interest rates: http://www.bloomberg.com/quicktake/negative-interest-rates

Negative rates is when savers pay to save.

If cash was prevalent, wouldn't savers simply withdraw all of their cash from the banks and stuff it into some vault somewhere? Of course - hence the coming cashless society, where bank runs are impossible.

There is always a bigger picture to consider

Decentralization doesn't mean something cannot be controlled. I mean, who is making the price per BTC go up and down... no one knows
 

LCSociety, I think you wanna do some more reading. You've got your ideology/morality right, but there's no proof that Wright [not White, btw] is Satoshi and people aren't saying that because of statist propaganda. It's also obvious that the USG and IC are panicked about Bitcoin/cryptocurrencies, because they are decentralized and thus cannot be controlled.

I don't know why Craig even attempted to prove himself as the real Satoshi Nakamoto when he knew he didn't have any conclusive proof to show to the pulic. Instead, Craig tried to wow the audience with cheap tricks that didn't work out so when he realized all he had done was making himself the laughing stock of the Internet right now he quit. Well what kind of respect do I owe this person?

let me take my popcorn and listen to you explain how he "signed the message". We all can sign the message too, which part of technicality do you not understand?

Never heard about this guy before. Now I did! That's why!

Yeah, but Gavin won't tell you're Satoshi so it's not true... 

I do believe that he has something to do with Bitcoin. Probably he is one part of the group behind Satoshi Nakamoto. But why did he do this step to go public without wanting to present a bombproof way to prove he is Satoshi? He is smart enough to know that he would get attention and a broad publicity.

Do you have evidence of this? Probably not.

He said he was forced to speak out publicly due to his staff and family members being harassed. This is something that all revolutionaries are forced to come to terms with.

The revolutionary himself may be willing to go out all guns blazing... but what about his wife, mother... kids.... employees... ? They didn't sign up to being harassed by the secret service. Having the police force entry into their homes to remove "goods" and so on.

No one knows why he decided to come out

Entertainment isn't real, it's all a show. The television and media in general should be known universally as 'The Reality Machine' because that's it's purpose. To construct, maintain and promote only a specific set of universal perceptions that benefits a specific agenda.

Look at Russia.

All of the media corporations, even the privately owned ones, are dominated by the government.

They script their news casts similar to the way they write and direct movies in hollywood. Ever heard of crisis actors?

Listen to this for a run down and explanation of how your "news" is created: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h992YwxLg44

In the 80's and early 90's the entire russian government was usurped by the russian mafia. 19 and 20 year old gangsters were running riot, going on murder spree's, scamming their way into owning BILLION dollar state assets like steel factories, and gas companies - i.e Roman Abramovich and his camp.

Boris Berezovsky, a famous Russian oligarch and mentor to Roman Abramovich - and former owner of the largest media organisation in russia by the way - scammed his way into wealth by scamming $50 Million via creating a joint stock IPO, offering the first "Russian people's car." By subscribing investors would have had a chance to own one of the first cars that rolled off the factory floor........ the factory was never built, Boris ran with the money and later became a powerful member of the Kremlin.

Watch this for a primer on how "real" power is amassed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2Cl8lSv9Is

You say the media can be "crappy" yah, tell me about it.
 



There is a lot more to this story than what has been brought to light. I don't think anyone can jump to conclusions without being DIRECTLY involved

I mean, remember that huge KONY 2012 campaign that went on a few years ago that pulled 101 Million views on youtube... Didn't "the media" say that the organizer of that campaign "went crazy...."

Character assassination baby. This is your Democracy
 

can you give me source or link that guardian already began to paint Craig as a potentially criminal liar?
this is too far for judge Craig as Criminal,yes i do respect his name as big investor of bitcoin,even people hate and not believe on hi,but yes we should respect Craig's name.

It would take him a few seconds to sign a message with genesis key or one of the keys associated with Satoshi. And that would immediately clear his name and make fools of all the doubters. But no, instead he came up with a BS post followed by an apology.

If he's Satoshi and lost the private keys or can't access them for some reason, then he should have stayed anonymous . It is obvious that people would demand a better proof than what he showed. There aren't any good scenarios for him:

- He's not Satoshi: He's getting what he deserves
- He's Satoshi but all his stuff is locked somewhere else: He's also getting what he deserves for not showing the slightest foresight
- He's Satoshi and he's toying with us: He's getting what he deserves for being a douche

The media can be crappy but he was the one who contacted them. Now they are just doing the fact checking that they should have done in the first place before. So what if they are now calling a liar, no one really cares anyway. They are covering their ass and that story will blow away like it did before.

Nice try Craig but you are still gonna have to pay your bills.

There's nothing complex about signing a message, which is why he wanted to broadcast himself doing just that live so that the BBC can present the code to a global audience, for every one to verify.

Things didn't pan out this way.

He said himself he doesn't care if people believe him or not. He simply wanted to prove that he wasn't a liar... so the BBC sold him a dream, and he fell for it

The fact that they are trying to tarnish this mans reputation only makes it obvious that there is alot more going on behind closed doors that Craig could potentially reveal

I said it before in another post... I won't be surprised if the guy turns up dead due to suicide via two gunshots to the head.

Character assassination requires air time to be sacrificed, they do not do this for no reason