Topic: Put some Respeck On Craig Wright's name - page 3. (Read 2361 times)

Apology accepted... in any way, I was a bit anal on the Surname because I want to stop further confusion in other people's reference to him.  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1463230.new#new

Your point is taken, and I agree.. We should give the guy a fair chance to prove himself and then decide if he is a fraudster or the real deal. I too was a bit quick on the trigger, when other people

started to doubt his honesty. The best way to do this, would be for people with sound technical knowledge to meet with him and then giving him a chance to prove himself. The one-on-one thing with

Gavin behind closed doors was a bit dodgy. Do a sort of Peer review with developers and then they can decide if there are any proof in this. If he can sign a message in the Genesis block... it would

make this option obsolete and we can just move forward. Him being a early adopter, makes signing early blocks as proof so much more complex. 

If I were a philosopher i'd ask, "what is a name?"

I mean look at that word... Sur-name. What is that? Why is it necessary for a human being to have a first name, and a surname? Sure, you'd like to separate one person from another. Understandable. But, the queen of england doesn't have a surname... her full name is Elizabeth Alexandra Mary... their family name is Saxe coburg gotha - publicly, Winsdor. There is no Sur-name - at least when you're not a serf of one form or another.

Serfs are trained to cherish the tools of their oppressors. Interesting.

I apologise for the incorrect spelling, never will i mispell a person's sur-name again. Forgive me

Again he signed a message live.. captured by the bbc, who craig assumed to be the most respectable medium to broadcast this revelation with. Obviously not the case. The bbc edited this out of their broadcast in order to properly execute their spin

The guardian picked up the ball and ran with it, publicly calling the man a liar

These are traits of character assassination.

Michael Jackson owned 50% of the recorded music publishing arm of Sony the corporation - Sony/ATV. This is one man, owning 50% of an arm of a multi national conglomerate. There was obviously a good character clause in his contract (an exit strategy for Sony), violation of which would lead to the forced selling of his portion of the company. Hence why his character was publicly assassinated continuously. Still he wouldn't sell. So, "let's try the old drug overdose chestnut."

The media is a powerful tool

I'm just saying, if most people here are opposed to government coercion and abuse, then we should all be a bit wiser than to jump when they tell us to

Guys and Girls, this guy is clearly trolling. Op are you deliberately spelling his Surname wrong? The guy is a fraudster until he publically bring valid proof that he is the real Satoshi. You would think a

person who wrote the Bitcoin protocol would know how to sign a message that would be acceptable to all.   The fact that he done that behind closed doors with someone who has had ties with people

that wanted to deliberately sabotage Bitcoin... speaks for itself. {Mike Hearn}  

Sign Satoshi's PGP key from 2008 or STFU

Look at this broadcast they put out on the Government of the United Kingom's Department of Propaganda. Sorry, i meant to say the BBC - although, since these individuals love acronyms, GUKDP seems more powerful than BBC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DCAC1j2HTY

Craig obviously went through the process of signing a message to confirm his identity, which was edited out due to the BBC being intent on forcing their sordid agenda onto the masses

I'm not aware of the technicality you speak of. If you can sign a message that proves that you're satoshi, then please do. That'll surely educate me as to the flimsy nature of the underlying code that supports the blockchain. I'd love to see this

I find it strange that human beings stare directly at the "facts" yet their beliefs override blatant evidence. I guess this is why the church is so powerful, and why the Vatican is one of the largest owners of land on a global scale

Interesting quirks in the construct of humanity

Gimme a minute, let me take my popcorn and listen to you explain how he "signed the message". We all can sign the message too, which part of technicality do you not understand?

I am not a Statist, and I don't knock you for being one.

I don't even knock those that are self professed libertarians and anarchists for unknowingly reverting back to Statisim when their government sponsored patriotism conditioning kicks in. It's difficult to control, I know.

A statist is a man who believes that some men have the right to force, coerce, enslave, rob, and murder others.

The fact that you reference "tax cheats," and "legality" shows that deep down you enjoy being oppressed.

The only tax cheat is the governemnt, because all taxes are illegal. If I were to smash up some local electronics store because they failed to pay me 30% of their yearly income, they'd throw me into a cage for 10 years due to "racketeering." When we do it it's a crime, when they do it - it's due to "legality."

In the purest form of reality 54 Million dollars is nothing.

Dollars are the figment of the imagination of a group of men that created the prison known as the united states of america. The Dollar is nothing except the legacy banking equivalent of a premine scam.

One's and zeros that mean nothing until you attach iconography.

So when you talk about "legal consequences" please be aware that in order for a group of people to attain the power to enforce any such "legal" repercussion... murders must be committed. Mass murders. Entire populations and civilizations wiped out - i.e the indigenous american indians. Wars must be waged in which millions more are murdered. Yet these very same "legal" acts that you mention state that committing but one murder makes you a criminal.

The second king of england had to murder the first one.

So literally, this legal hogwash that you speak of is meaningless. There are no criminals, just human beings.

We all need to re-evaluate our ideologies of what reality is before we can cast judgement on another man. Especially before we cast ill judgement on Craig White, who has made all of us wealthier in one way or another

i think you should read more about what identity theft is and what are the legal consequences of doing such a thing. also let us not forget about the 54 million dollars tax problem with the IRS or whatever the acronyms are for their tax thingy

Caught by whom? Were you there, or did you read that in some article produced by some media conglomerate? The same media conglomerate that dictates which toothpaste you use in the morning, and which brand of salt your mother uses to season your dinner every sunday?

Charles Lee was a lone actor. Craig White is not a lone actor. Edison was not a lone actor, he built GE following the direction of the Morgan Dynasty. The question is, which dynasty is Craig White working for?

I mean, this could all be a marketing ploy to get bitcoin back in front of the masses in preparation for another price manipulation - and with this being "halving year" this is most likely the case. But, who knows - i guess that would be too logical

Personally, it's not that important to me.

I personally respect Craig for creating the blockchain, and I think we should all give him his flowers whilst he is still alive to smell them.

The government isn't opposed to bitcoin at all. Having the wealth of the world concentrated into one digital protocol is the stuff of dreams for social engineers. If they were opposed to bitcoin, it wouldn't take up even an inch of precious air time on their mass indoctrination networks. Bitcoin has been all over the BBC the past few years. BBC is not a commercial organisation, it's literally a department of the british government.

Hence why you can turn on a programme like eastenders and be blasted with an onslaught of depopulation conditioning.

Anyway, we all have our opinions... and there are three sides to every story. Thus far we have only been presented with two sides


Libertarians, anti capitalists and anarchists all claim to hate and be opposed to all forms of government. Yet when one of your own gets one over on this government that you hate, you become a statist all of a sudden

Is this why they force american students to pledge allegiance to "the flag" every morning? That conditioning sticks like double sided tape doesn't it?

No, he didn't. You're taking someone's word for it, and he's specifically failed to do so publicly so that you can confirm it yourself. It would be a trivial exercise for an honest actor to provide the public proof, as Charles Lee demonstrated with his Litecoin genesis block proof. On the flip side he's been caught scamming over and over with back-dated documents and an obfuscated, dishonest proof from his May 2 blog post, among other things. It's not character assassination at this point to say he's being dishonest with the public and there is no objective reason to believe he is Satoshi.

Defrauding the state for millions isn't making a bit of money here and there.

I have an incapability to respond to "wealth shaming."

So what, he is making a bit of money here and there - as he should. He is one of the only human beings that can say that they have created THOUSANDS of millionaires. Everyone that was mining bitcoin on their laptops back in 2010 - 2012 should be reacting with aggression now that this man is being slandered like this.

Tony Blair the man that turned Iraq into a derelict bombshell, murdered millions and is directly responsible for the 'rape by solider' of hundreds of thousands of females (child and adult) has earned $100,000,000++ over the last 6 years, I think that is something worthy of outrage. Not some powerless, lone man making a few million here and there.

Craig white was the lead developer of this software that has changed all of our lives. He signed a message live on camera, but the BBC edited this out of their slanted presentation - for obvious reasons.

If you call yourself an Anarchist... If you call yourself a Libertarian... If you're anti this, and anti that - why are you so easily lead by this very same government that you defame? I mean, really? All it takes is media spin to whip you anti-establishment "rebels" into a frenzy?

Rest assured, there will be a big bitcoin pump in the coming weeks

So we'll all continue to make big money. But I must say it again. Let us all stop playing with this man's name. Let us all put more than a generous amount Respeck on it

He signed a message privately to Gavin Andresen, that's no irrefutable proof that he's satoshi. Did you know that Wright's fortune literally depends on being Satoshi? Hee took $54m in R&D subsidies, to qualify for those he claimed that he had signed the rights of millions of dollars worth of bitcoin to a third party. Do you see why he'd want to lie about being Satoshi now?

He is the inventor of the Blockchain and Bitcoin. He has "signed a message" and confirmed this, but yet the character assassination continues

Don't let media spin guide your thoughts.

I just read the UK's Guardian, and they have already began to paint Craig as a potentially criminal liar. Which is very troublesome indeed.

We have seen the guy speak many times, and he doesn't seem prideful that he created bitcoin. He doesn't even want any accolades or awards. Why is that?

Would you want to be etched in stone as a contributor to the enslavement of mankind?

I think we need to put at least two tablespoons of Respeck on Craig White's name. He has allowed most us to grow wealthy.

Try to resist falling into the trap of believing the media spin. I mean, there is clearly alot more to be revealed but the machine has already set to work on tarnishing this guys credibility, so when he does present us with some merky facts of who else is involved with Bitcoin, he'll be dismissed as some incompetent liar.

Sad times... I've nothing else to say on this matter. So yes, I'm finshed AND done! And I wont say it anymore