Pages:
Author

Topic: Q: Should hilariousandco *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no - page 2. (Read 2832 times)

member
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
There is nothing wrong with hilarious being a mod, I think he/she is perfectly capable of carrying out the duties required. I've found hilarious to be nothing other than trustworthy & a good person tbh.
hilariousandco is explicitly endorsing the actions of an extortionist. This alone outweighs any and all other contributions to the community via moderating and otherwise.


If he is willing to endorse an extortionist, why would you believe he will not engage in extortion himself? Most extortion attempts are done with anon identities to protect one-self against the consequences of attempting extortion.
legendary
Activity: 3556
Merit: 9709
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
There is nothing wrong with hilarious being a mod, I think he/she is perfectly capable of carrying out the duties required. I've found hilarious to be nothing other than trustworthy & a good person tbh.
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
hilariousandco should not be a moderator because of his stance on extortionists. He currently has an extortionist on his trust list (Lauda), who has admitted to the extortion, not once, but twice.

If hilariousandco is the reason why an extortionist is on Default Trust, then what is the basis for trusting him to impartially moderate the forum?

For as long as lauda remains on hilariousandco's trust list, I believe it be appropriate to both remove hilariousandco from being a Global Moderator, and remove him from Default Trust.

I move to have hilariousandco removed from being a moderator and being on Default Trust effective immediately.  

For as long as both hilariousandco remains a moderator and on Default Trust, and lauda remains on hilariousandco's trust list, I understand theymos agrees this behavior is acceptable.

I think they should all be fired

https://imgur.com/a/6EIiU
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
Lauda will use alternate accounts to extort users.
Pathetic irony; grow up QS. Roll Eyes

Lauda regularly refuses to provide evidence of allegations he makes when leaving negative ratings, making it impossible to dispute what lauda alleges.
* Lauda waits for your evidence of my "alternate accounts". Cheesy
member
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
I dont agree that this has influence on hilariousandco's moderation work, but Im in support of an open discussion regarding the trusted status of Lauda.
If hilariousandco is putting an extortionist in a position of power and authority publicly, then how can we trust him to take moderation actions that are, by definition anonymous?

Believing that Lauda behaves like this for the sake of the community does not makes the person believing it a complete morron by default that is no longer able to do what they have been done well for a long time. If you argue like this, no one should read anything you said, because you made the mistake of escrowing for yourself in the past.
You are making assumptions that are unfounded and/or untrue.

Individual members should make their own conclusions as to if someone should be trusted. If evidence cannot and is not posted on a regular basis, then the person making accusations should not be trusted.


Lauda regularly refuses to provide evidence of allegations he makes when leaving negative ratings, making it impossible to dispute what lauda alleges. This ignores the fact that if alligations are correct, that the receiver of negative ratings would not be a scammer by any measure.



I trust Lauda's ratings here regardless of what he did
So you believe what Lauda says regardless of his past transgressions? You do realize that lauda's history of extorting people means any rating (including lack thereof) could be the result of extortion, right? It is fairly standard to (at least attempt to) hide the fact that a specific person is extorting someone, but rather to prove knowledge of specific negative information.

and think he is of benefit to the community being on default trust, but if I felt he was abusing his position on there for personal vendettas or to extort people then I would have no issue in removing him.
There will almost never be evidence of extortion in these situations. Lauda will use alternate accounts to extort users. There is no benefit to using a credible/primary account to carry out an extortion scheme as long as you can show your victim that you have the knowledge of information the victim does not want made public.
hero member
Activity: 1568
Merit: 544
Your personal vendetta again QuickSeller.

QS with trusts issues   Cry
I cannot trust

Name:   Quickseller
Trust:   -241: -8 / +15
Warning: Trade with extreme caution!

I dont trust you... your a scammer Scam Accusations (Moderator: Cyrus) > Quickseller escrowing for himself



Most importantly, after a review of the last ~45 days of Lauda's post history, I was able to find exactly zero posts in which Lauda attempted to address any concerns about his ratings.

Your history shows your obsessed by Lauda.

Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
Indeed. I haven't seen someone around here who is this much out of touch with reality; then again, I don't visit really weird threads often. Grin

Quickseller is just immoral.   There are weirder people out there:

The little child with bone cancer is imperfect. The bone cancer shows it. Since he is imperfect, he is a sinner, even though it was foisted on him by his parents.

Thank God that He has found a way to allow us imperfect people to continue to live for a while. Thank Him even more that He has given us Jesus, His Son, so that we can even have eternal life when we believe.

lol
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
His account is destroyed.  Nothing he can do now can make it any worse, so he'll make up any story he can.
Indeed. I haven't seen someone around here who is this much out of touch with reality; then again, I don't visit really weird threads often. Grin

Sorry you have to go through this, but people can see his trust rating and make their own decisions.
Thanks; I'm ok / used to, let's say, *malicious things* such as this. It is others, who are completely Innocent, that are suffering with statements like those.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
Take a look at his continued bullying / defamation (of course neither *teams* care about this / are already informed / his post will likely be removed):
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annbsd-bitsend-online-since-2014-core-017-1370307
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21366560

His account is destroyed.  Nothing he can do now can make it any worse, so he'll make up any story he can.

Sorry you have to go through this, but people can see his trust rating and make their own decisions.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
This is why Quickseller is a hypocrite.  Does one thing, says another.
Take a look at his continued bullying / defamation (of course neither *teams* care about this / are already informed / his post will likely be removed):
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annbsd-bitsend-online-since-2014-core-017-1370307
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21366560

Attacking projects, run by others, which have / had nothing to do with any of that is utmost pathetic to say the least.

You continue to bully other projects, but of course, I don't expect mr. shorena to act equally and neg. rate you. I wonder why that is. Smiley
PM sent just in case. Roll Eyes
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
As mentioned previously, I cannot trust the integrity of anyone that puts someone who acts this way in a position of power.

Remember your escrow scam?

I cannot trust the integrity of anyone who acts that way in a position of power.

This is why Quickseller is a hypocrite.  Does one thing, says another.

Cool

legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
Most importantly, after a review of the last ~45 days of Lauda's post history, I was able to find exactly zero posts in which Lauda attempted to address any concerns about his ratings.
There were no public concerns that need be addressed, there is only concern trolling from known scammers such as yourself.

-snip-
Lauda literally has zero respect for others, and this kind of behavior does nothing good for the community.
And the puppet continues to lie. Maybe selling an account or two to a scammer, again, would make you feel better? Smiley

Hmm, what do we have here?

Lol, I find it hilarious how easy it is for some people to troll zepher:D
Roll Eyes

You continue to bully other projects, but of course, I don't expect mr. shorena to act equally and neg. rate you. I wonder why that is. Smiley
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
There is also the below IRC comment by Lauda


Lauda literally has zero respect for others, and this kind of behavior does nothing good for the community.


As mentioned previously, I cannot trust the integrity of anyone that puts someone who acts this way in a position of power.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
Ignoring the above, lauda has a history of trolling those who question him and refuses to have a public discussion about any of his ratings. Even if his ratings were factually accurate (I believe many of them are not), many of his negative ratings are for things that no reasonable person would consider to be a scam. This alone is reason enough to question the integrity of anyone who puts lauda in a position of trust, and/or authority. I can post examples of this however I don't think this fact is really unknown to both of laudas default trust sponsors. If necessary I will post examples of this so neither of them can claim ignorance, however anything I post in this regard should be news to either hc or blazed.
Trolling with a meme (excluding the Michael Jackson Meme):
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21352690
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21012792
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.20888931
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.20773141
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.20641605
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.20636133
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.20634366
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.20390616




Using the word “snowflake”:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21289657
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21284120
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21217968



Michael Jackson Popcorn meme:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21195900
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.20512859


Openly being proud of the fact that people hate him:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.20927343

Most importantly, after a review of the last ~45 days of Lauda's post history, I was able to find exactly zero posts in which Lauda attempted to address any concerns about his ratings.
legendary
Activity: 1210
Merit: 1024


This is Quickseller.

hilariousandco is a trusted member of this forum.  Quickseller is not.

/end


Are you talking about the very same Quickseller that was kicked off DT because he was caught red-handed running an escrow scam?

Not that QS?



~BCX~
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
Let me make one thing very clear, you have not left negative trust against any of my unknown alts now or previous as of when I owned them. Furthermore, the amount of money you have cost me in any way is exactly zero. I do not stand to profit in anyway from your removal from the default trust network other than the fact that the trust system and marketplace would have more credibility.
copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1528
No I dont escrow anymore.
I assume I will be dragged into this next so here is my answer...no need for a special Blazed thread  Cool

You assume correct:

A thread regarding Blazed is forthcoming is Lauda is not removed from his trust list. 

Thanks for posting what I knew you would though. I probably should just accept that you will not see this differently.
hero member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 569
Ever since i have been exposed to the issue of quickseller versus others, it has always been one issue after the other and up till now, it does not seems to come to an end. I think there is need to separate issues whether the moderator has default in his responsibility is what should be the deciding factor in determining whether he should continue or not and this is what every who has commented freely have agreed. The moment he start failing in that or the trust issues start affecting the main function, we can then start this discussion.
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1375
Slava Ukraini!
Here we go again... I don't know who made this topic, but are you still not tired to fight against respected bitcointalk members? Ok, hilariousandco have Lauda on his trust list, but can you tell, how it can affect moderation of forum? My personal opinion that he is doing his job not bad (can't say perfect, because there is too much spam, but at least he is trying to take actions to reduce it).
I don't see any reasons why h&c shouldn't be mod of bitcointalk.
legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1268
In Memory of Zepher
Let me make one thing very clear, you have not left negative trust against any of my unknown alts now or previous as of when I owned them. Furthermore, the amount of money you have cost me in any way is exactly zero. I do not stand to profit in anyway from your removal from the default trust network other than the fact that the trust system and marketplace would have more credibility.
It is hard to believe anything that you say when you have lied so freely in the past.
Pages:
Jump to: