Thanks, I had deliberately left the locked original thread, but I have taken your advice and added the current OTC exchange too! The thread was probably locked to prevent people discussing the points I'm making, fair enough! But its a free market, so I can start my own thread.
I've done the same as you and invested in Qora MK 1. That's sensible risk management.
I do think recent crypto currency history does give us many clues as to how things *might* develop in the Qora ecosystem from here. It is very unlikely Qora MK 1 will progress like NXT. Here are some reasons:
- NXT IPO investors took a risk on an IDEA - a fairly distributed POS coin. They weren't out to get rich, so when BCNext closed the IPO he didn't really bother to promote they did get rich, but they didn't expect that when they invested in NXT, and so for the most part they acted in an altruistic way. They sold heaps very cheaply without any prompting. They saw it as their responsibility to grow the NXT community. They weren't greedy.
- The first wave of NXT clones were jokes, then NEM came, and now we see viable NXT clones (NHZ, NXTL, NFD victim reboot, N2Coin, NAS etc). But NXT community was established by then, so NXT has achieved partial network effect. A Qora clone can start the day the code is open sourced. We can work on the distribution NOW. That's the obligation the Qora MK 1 guys are walking away from. DISTRIBUTION.
- If Qora dev is BCNext, then he doesn't care about money, and distribution is an irritant to him, so he wants the Qora MK 1 whales to do what the NXT whales did, but it looks like the Qora IPO attracted guys with 'NXT 73 fever' - they are already emotionally attached to the 'I'm rich, yippee!' feeling. NXT whales didn't do that (or if they did they did it privately). Qora MK 1 whale behaviour will not produce a good distribution, so a Qora MK 2 clone is inevitable.
- Qora dev is NOT attached to the 137 IPO investors from Qora MK 1, he is attached to his invention ('Qora'), and he will support ANY Qora clones that are not scams. Code guys want to share and advance their ideas. Short sighted IPO investors want to never release the source code, but the dev does, and so do 99.9% of future Qora users (i.e everyone in Qora MK 1 except the original 137, and 100% or all users in all other Qora clones)
- Qora dev will most likely move on before Qora is polished and ready for mass adoption, so other developers will need to do this work. Unless they were part of the Qora MK 1 IPO, who will pay them? Dev bounties don't work for a project like this. How did NXT manage? 1 - unclaimed IPO shares of 10 Million NXT (equivalent to 100 Million Qora - 2- Jean-Luc, NXT core dev is a 50 Million NXT guy, and doesn't need to be paid 3 - NXt price crashed for months and so guys like jl777, wesley, CIYAM, etc had plenty of time to buy a big stake very cheaply. If Qora MK 1 price goes up much further you wont be able to attract new developers, so you'll have to get dev bounties. How much? Conservative estimate would be 10-15%, 1.5 Billion coins. That would give Qora the equivalent budget that NXt has used.
Yes, I like the look of Qora very much, and I have, and will, try to buy more Qora MK 1 coins. But I know a POS coin survives more than anything else on its community, and Qora MK 1 is the most vulnerable coin in crypto history. NAS has a better chance of surviving IMO than Qora MK 1 because its dirt cheap, and despite its dubious origins, people are buying it BECAUSE ITS CHEAP.
Nobody in their right mind should pay 100 satoshi for Qora MK 1. By all means put in some big low bids around 10-20 satoshi, but anymore is madness. There's no rush on the OTC exchange. Wait, be smart
EVERYBODY, should consider supporting a Qora MK 2 clone that learns from crypto history.
Qora clone brain storming:
- Most important thing is the community - people
- Second most important thing is the clonehas to guarantee future dev support, and a big personal stake beats dev bounties hands down (how many NEM devs got NXT dev stakes? do some research, dev bounties can't keep a good dev, only a big personal stake can motivate - look at Jean-Luc form NXT
- Avoid IPO for POS initial distribution - don't receive any funds - too many scams have done that - free coins, look credible, dev shares, accept donations
- Employ sockpuppet counter-mearsures and be 100% transparent - learn from NEM, NHZ and NXTL etc. Spend time developing the procedures for the widest, fairest distribution of equal shares - it is possible, and someone will eventually do it (it could be 'us')
For a POS coin the distro is vital, but most devs naturally are concentrating on the code, so they don't bother with that. The 'devs' of the recent batch of POS coins based on bitcoin code base (like coffecoin, sharcoin, energycoin etc etc) put 100% of effort on marketing and distro ideas. Qora MK 2 clone has lots of places to get good distro ideas.
NXT distro was awful with 73, but it was the first, so it got through by default.
Qora wont be the same, unless of course the price drops to ~10-20 satoshi and lots of whales dump a portion of their stake to realise their profit and fulfill their 'civic duty'
Who doesn't think a Qora clone will appear? Why not start the ground work now? If nothing else it will freak the shit of Qora MK 1 whales and cause a few to dump a bit, and IMO that's worth the effort alone if it pushes the Qora MK 1 price down to a realistic level. But I'm all for starting a New Qora, where the community focuses on achieving the best, widest, fairest distro possible built on top of a very exciting code base (Qora MK 1)
Some name choices:
NewQora
Qora the Explorer
Qora2
QoraQoraQora
PeoplesQora
If Qora was your mommy, and NEM was your daddy, you would be ..... [fill in the blank]