Topic: QTUM - calling all S-C-A-M Hunters. Billionaires, whales, chinese exchanges?? - page 3. (Read 7852 times)
February 27, 2017, 05:52:03 PM
With legit ICOs like Chronobank dumping, what more with an ICO that's shrouded with shady players.
February 27, 2017, 01:33:51 PM
No comment from ver on this yet... what's his bct handle?
Very interesting read, not just because of Ver: http://coinjournal.net/ver-backed-qtum-started-bitbay-dai/
Very interesting reading the article. In either case I was not going to invest in this project
I actually planned to do deeper research before but believed I would invest from what I knew so far - until two days ago. But this seems to be a project that becomes less attractive and more concerning the more one knows, not only because the Dai-topic. Never a good sign.
February 27, 2017, 01:27:51 PM
No comment from ver on this yet... what's his bct handle?
Very interesting read, not just because of Ver: http://coinjournal.net/ver-backed-qtum-started-bitbay-dai/
Very interesting reading the article. In either case I was not going to invest in this project
February 27, 2017, 07:11:33 AM
No comment from ver on this yet... what's his bct handle?
Very interesting read, not just because of Ver: http://coinjournal.net/ver-backed-qtum-started-bitbay-dai/
February 27, 2017, 07:09:55 AM
No comment from ver on this yet... what's his bct handle?
February 26, 2017, 10:51:26 PM
Seen this before with Adam Guerbuez's Viral or IconicExpert's Bytecent. People will lose money.
February 26, 2017, 10:26:37 PM
Cryptohunter, I don't know the background of this exactly, but the high-paying sig campaign with a self-moderated thread sends up a red flag. Scammers with new coins hype them to death, and I've seen this before with Candlecoin (?) and one or two others. None of this surprises me, and it's why I don't invest in shit coins.
I welcome the scam accusations. I hope people get skeptical and don't invest. that means a better price for me when I invest February 26, 2017, 10:23:39 PM
You can call me naive, but still I am confused. I have read some posts from the Qtum thread but not all...
Qtum seems a great project,when i looked about it and when they started to market Qtum, honestly they spent a good amount of money to promote it. From sig campaign to articles posted on big sites, like Nasdaq, Forbes and others. Does it make sense to spend a good bag of cash like they did/do if it is for scamming at the end?
I plan on investing in Qtum. All I see here is another crypto witch hunt. Qtum seems a great project,when i looked about it and when they started to market Qtum, honestly they spent a good amount of money to promote it. From sig campaign to articles posted on big sites, like Nasdaq, Forbes and others. Does it make sense to spend a good bag of cash like they did/do if it is for scamming at the end?
February 26, 2017, 08:52:23 PM
You can call me naive, but still I am confused. I have read some posts from the Qtum thread but not all...
Qtum seems a great project,when i looked about it and when they started to market Qtum, honestly they spent a good amount of money to promote it. From sig campaign to articles posted on big sites, like Nasdaq, Forbes and others. Does it make sense to spend a good bag of cash like they did/do if it is for scamming at the end?
Qtum seems a great project,when i looked about it and when they started to market Qtum, honestly they spent a good amount of money to promote it. From sig campaign to articles posted on big sites, like Nasdaq, Forbes and others. Does it make sense to spend a good bag of cash like they did/do if it is for scamming at the end?
February 26, 2017, 08:44:36 PM
Cryptohunter, I don't know the background of this exactly, but the high-paying sig campaign with a self-moderated thread sends up a red flag. Scammers with new coins hype them to death, and I've seen this before with Candlecoin (?) and one or two others. None of this surprises me, and it's why I don't invest in shit coins.
February 26, 2017, 08:35:30 PM
What is the evidence Stephen/Patrick Dai did anything wrong? Actual evidence.
Bitbay developer Zimbeck is credible and says he has the evidence. The accused didn't deny that Zimbeck has that evidence.
February 26, 2017, 08:23:41 PM
What is the evidence Stephen/Patrick Dai did anything wrong? Actual evidence.
Bitbay developer Zimbeck is credible and says he has the evidence. The accused didn't deny that Zimbeck has that evidence.
February 26, 2017, 06:35:45 PM
What is the evidence Stephen/Patrick Dai did anything wrong? Actual evidence.
Bitbay developer Zimbeck is credible and says he has the evidence. The accused didn't deny that Zimbeck has that evidence.
February 26, 2017, 06:31:36 PM
I have not seen any evidence this guy did anything wrong.
Crypto is full of people making accusations without evidence.
What is the evidence Stephen/Patrick Dai did anything wrong? Actual evidence.
Crypto is full of people making accusations without evidence.
What is the evidence Stephen/Patrick Dai did anything wrong? Actual evidence.
Quote
evidence
ˈɛvɪd(ə)ns/Submit
noun
1.
the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.
"the study finds little evidence of overt discrimination"
synonyms: proof, confirmation, verification, substantiation, corroboration, affirmation, authentication, attestation, documentation; More
ˈɛvɪd(ə)ns/Submit
noun
1.
the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.
"the study finds little evidence of overt discrimination"
synonyms: proof, confirmation, verification, substantiation, corroboration, affirmation, authentication, attestation, documentation; More
February 26, 2017, 09:50:46 AM
Spoetnik are you proud of me now?
He is a co-founder, I'm not sure whether they(the foundation members) have right to fire him, many other co-founders can. There is no board there, fire a co-founder could be very difficult. And 1 million USD has invested on him already.
As if they would tell you the truth.
When there is a corruption at the very top, you can safely assume that many people were also involved in a planned corruption. They've already scammed $1 million out of the community.
You'll never be able to determine who of those remaining are not scammers.
Safer to assume they all are complicit and move on. Blacklist all their names from future projects, so there are consequences to working with scammers.
Sorry for the bag holders. Let it be a lesson to you to stop investing in bullshit. Any one can write up a whitepaper and make a fancy website with a lot of rehashed bullshit.
Who scam the once - will scam again..... Don't trust in such team for real.... Just fire the Dai and all will be Glad
He is a co-founder, I'm not sure whether they(the foundation members) have right to fire him, many other co-founders can. There is no board there, fire a co-founder could be very difficult. And 1 million USD has invested on him already.
One of the most interesting questions in my opinion is, if the rest of the team knew about Dai's past or not. Any infos?
As if they would tell you the truth.
When there is a corruption at the very top, you can safely assume that many people were also involved in a planned corruption. They've already scammed $1 million out of the community.
You'll never be able to determine who of those remaining are not scammers.
Safer to assume they all are complicit and move on. Blacklist all their names from future projects, so there are consequences to working with scammers.
Sorry for the bag holders. Let it be a lesson to you to stop investing in bullshit. Any one can write up a whitepaper and make a fancy website with a lot of rehashed bullshit.
February 26, 2017, 08:19:11 AM
Is there a investigate result of this coin ?
February 26, 2017, 07:52:40 AM
This is the most sophisticated scam, even more elaborate than deCLOUDs self-escrow scam, Patrick Dai has scammed so many famous angel investors, which astonishes me, how can those rich guys so silly to trust the liar?
February 26, 2017, 05:55:37 AM
Personally I think QTUM and adzcoin are going to make it hugh. But two days back , I just saw a thread telling QTUM may be a scam. But I dont think so
Some people can't read?
(He must already be a bag holder)He confirmed it himself in a statement. Go read the qtum thread in detail it's all there.
The accused admitted his involvement.
I think the best think for Qtum moving forward is to tell Patrick/Johnson Dai or what is name may be to step down. People here have learnt their lesson and most do take the issue of scam lightly.
February 26, 2017, 05:01:49 AM
I never accuse I only ask the question.
Ok...you never accuse.
Confirmed that patrik dai is stephen dai who scammed bitbay.
Qtum is done.
Next.
Qtum is done.
Next.
But you just accused without any evidence.
This is unbelievable someone with a lot of the particular name. February 26, 2017, 04:58:11 AM
Personally I think QTUM and adzcoin are going to make it hugh. But two days back , I just saw a thread telling QTUM may be a scam. But I dont think so
Some people can't read?
(He must already be a bag holder)He confirmed it himself in a statement. Go read the qtum thread in detail it's all there.
The accused admitted his involvement.
Jump to: