Topic: Quality over Quantity in the bounty game (Read 624 times)
I think that you especially will not help, because at the moment there is no normal bounty of the company. There are less good projects in whose bounty companies you can take part. Quantity has never been the main task, but the quality is now a problem.
at least there are still some of the bounty project anyone can to produce. Indeed since the early entry in crypto, analysis and deepening must start emphasizing. This is important because many unexpected things in crypto and this can be bad if not savvy to overcome it. Don't be too put forward the results before you can fully understand will be crypto.
Quantity is more important here I am sure. It is better to have one particular doing and do it well than to have a lot of them and do not do them right. I like to be in the one case and control it than to be everywhere and can’t understand what should I do in common.
In the world today
We have different people with quite a long list of ideas
What you believe cannot be what I believe
The way you rate a project is not the same way I rate a project
The terms with which you rate a project is different from my terms
Do you understand??
We have different people with quite a long list of ideas
What you believe cannot be what I believe
The way you rate a project is not the same way I rate a project
The terms with which you rate a project is different from my terms
Do you understand??
I do not agree with you. It is pretty hard to find a great bounty, that will guarantee you high earnings. I would prefer to participate in 10 of them. Five of them will go scam, another three will be listed on a shitty exchange and only one or two will give you benefits.
I used to join plenty of bounties especially during the bull market (oct 2017 to feb 2018) but when the delayed of bounty payment started during the bear season. I lessen my participation on many bounties and choose only the bounties being handled by trusted campaign managers of the forum.
You are absolutely right. Hunters need to make a good investigation, before participating in any project. They should read the whitepaper, look at the community in Telegram, search for reviews or interesting articles and only if you are sure, you can participate.
This is what I try to look out for when I am signing up for bounties, you could sign up for a bounty that gives you a lot of coins but when the coins are not worth anything then it is a waste. It is better that you get paid a small amount of coins but the coins are worth a good deal than getting paid a lot of coins which you cannot use for anything.
It is important to know exactly what you are supporting in a project. One must be able to answer the question of how relevance will a project been supported be in the scheme of things in cryptocurrency and beyond.
But how do you define the quality of a project? What do you use to identify so-called high quality projects?
I think this is the most difficult. Everyone has a different understanding of the project. Maybe I think a good project, you will feel it is bad.
I think this is the most difficult. Everyone has a different understanding of the project. Maybe I think a good project, you will feel it is bad.
I think you are right, because most of the current bounty activities are shit, because the number of fraudsters is increasing, but good projects still exist, which requires you to analyze carefully!
It is true that we also do not want to spend the important time we have just to follow the SCAm bounty campaign.
Maybe it's better to keep asking the Facebook Bounty group and keep asking the Bounty Manager.
Maybe it's better to keep asking the Facebook Bounty group and keep asking the Bounty Manager.
First and foremost, I must say your assertion isn't that construed well much. For the benefit of not raising fear in people's mind, I think it's best if you avoid fud by claiming everything bounty campaigns over the past few months have amounted to nothing. The implications this kind of assertion will have negative wise cannot be over looked especially in connection to people just coming into the game.
For the sake of avoiding quantity for quality as you have done well to input by the way, I wanna just recommend a way i have known and has worked perfectly fine for me. That is joining to a credible/transparent bounty team on telegram. Doing this, I think it will help. It has worked perfectly fine for me, I think it should work for anyone.
For the sake of avoiding quantity for quality as you have done well to input by the way, I wanna just recommend a way i have known and has worked perfectly fine for me. That is joining to a credible/transparent bounty team on telegram. Doing this, I think it will help. It has worked perfectly fine for me, I think it should work for anyone.
Until now, I am surprised by people who decided that without making any effort they will be able to earn money. In most cases, such people lose their money. To earn participating in bounty campaigns it is necessary to do a large amount of work on the analysis of the project, the team and their activities.
I see also in the past few months many scam projects and projects that stopped when IOO disappointed us as our haunted bounties spent time and had no results, four months to five months after ico they stopped wasting a lot of time and also electricity internet costs as well no compensation for that
Its a pleasure to promote something you believe in, but when it comes to campaigns, quantity works for most people.
This is absolutely not really true. I wanna believe you have only based this assertion of yours on a personal experience which if you have even taken enough precautions, you might have avoided this your Zero ish issue. Since this is the problem and you know, just as you highlighted, you can help your self to qualitative campaigns where you get an assurance of earning better.
Though you are being criticized with your "zero" statement, your overall statement makes sense to me. Well, I don't agree with the "zero" but I would say joining a project as a bounty hunter should be researched and studied first. It's better to endorse only one good project than a hundred of shit ICOs.
Yes, the analysis takes time, especially now, but there is no guarantee that you will go into a worthwhile project, so it's easier to just take what you like and do your job
Sometimes, even a bad project can collect a soft cap and you get a lot of tokens for the bounty. It's like a lottery, there's no room for analysis.
Jump to: