true use case is also something crucial for every project same as fundamental as well in which gonna determine the demand.
even though there are some coin that could still thrive without this, but it's important to ensure that even in the future the coin will still have its place and its market capital
to be growing, usually though coin with most use case are those that derived from smart contract blockchain.
we all know ethereum is having infinite supply but it's still considered a good investment because the use case is there.
It's not just about the use cases and demand for the blockchain space. We should not forget that well-known smart contract platforms, such as BNB, ETH, also have a combustion mechanism that saves them from increased supply and inflation. Despite the fact that coins with the combustion mechanism also have a maximum supply, it allows them to retain their value well, even during market dumps.
Use case, demand, coin burns - condensing the multifaceted crypto universe into these elements seems rather reductive, doesn't it? Ethereum's smart contracts matter, but isn't its unlimited supply more than a footnote?
Regarding coin burns - BNB and ETH may use it, but does it guarantee immunity from inflation? Is the burn strategy merely a market-manipulating sleight of hand? It might prop up value during a slump, but it also ties the coin's worth to the project controllers' caprice, right?
The crypto realm is an expansive, unpredictable terrain. It's not as linear as use case + demand + coin burn = success!