Pages:
Author

Topic: Radeon™ RX 560 Gaming OC 4G (rev. 1.0) 16.3MH/s bios - page 2. (Read 13085 times)

newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
I was thinking to make a rig of those, any of you have used latest 11.5 from Claymore ? I saw a jump on 550 hashrate, and I was wondering if the same things happened with tH 560
I'm still using v.10.5.
I've tried v.11.2 but there was no ETH hashrate increase. Also I doubt about v.11.x stability after I've read some forum posts.
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 19
I was thinking to make a rig of those, any of you have used latest 11.5 from Claymore ? I saw a jump on 550 hashrate, and I was wondering if the same things happened with tH 560
sr. member
Activity: 2632
Merit: 328
My original, less aggressive strap/rom for this card can be found here:

https://anorak.tech/t/rx-560-4gb-on-ethereum/7493/136
member
Activity: 239
Merit: 10
    I have RX 560 Gaming OC 4G rev.2 card. Memory type identified in BIOS is just the same but strap that work so nice for rev. 1.0 card is not really better then original unmodified for the card. Anything above 14 Mh got unstable. So I reverted back to PBE timings that at least get 14.6 Mh/s stable. Not too much :-(
    Thanks for tips and discussion. Sorry no merit to share.
sr. member
Activity: 2632
Merit: 328
I had a negative experience with BIOS update, firmware fell and had to carry to the service center for the recovery. You have to be careful.

You can usually do it yourself, if you have another card, or onboard video

But of course, always be careful about what you're doing
Miz
member
Activity: 336
Merit: 12
I had a negative experience with BIOS update, firmware fell and had to carry to the service center for the recovery. You have to be careful.
sr. member
Activity: 2632
Merit: 328
I downloaded bios from here

https://www.techpowerup.com/vgabios/199626/199626

and straps are indeed pretty different...even SEQ_MISC1

that is usually same for same memory manufacturers

(and I have no idea whats inside that one)
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
What core freq do you use? I have problems with stability with the card until I lower core to 1100 and undervolt it to 775, after that I've got memory to 2100 (with PBE timings, not Branko)
Usually I start testing using the following conditions:
CV: 800mV
PL: +25
CC: 1150MHz
MC: 1950MHz

"with PBE timings" - PBE timings usually work fine for me as well
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
now you got me curious enough to go buy one, but lucky as I am,
I'll probably get one with 1500MHz Hynix Smiley
It's always a lottery. Unfortunately Sad
It was just 1 day lag between 2 orders in my case. And I've got GPUs with different mem chips.
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
"-80" means the highest possible data rate in the series - 8.0 Gb/s.
So GPUs with such memory should give a good hash rate. Seems, we just need a strap with proper timings.  Wink
sr. member
Activity: 2632
Merit: 328

The chips on the GV-RX560GAMING OC-4GD/FW0/06F3 are marked as 7WB77 D9VVR.
MSI RX560 AERO ITX 4G OC - 7WB77 D9VVR
Gigabyte GV-RX560OC-4GD - 7SA47 D9TRZ

That's the answer why the msi aero and gigabyte gaming behaves in a similar way - they use the same memory chip.

D9VVR is MT51J256M32HF-80:B

Now that is interesting...your ordinary GB seems to have 1500MHz chips, so no wonder it doesn't work good,
but these with D9VVR if that's indeed MT51J256M32HF-80:B should work even better than my cards, as
that indicate 2000MHz chips...now you got me curious enough to go buy one, but lucky as I am,
I'll probably get one with 1500MHz Hynix Smiley
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
@1377tools Do you use whole bios provided by Branko or straps only?
I apply the same (or almost the same) mods to original GPU's bios.
member
Activity: 239
Merit: 10
Hi Branko,

I've tested the strap on 2 GPUs:
1. Gigabyte GV-RX560OC-4GD - ETH 15.6MHz@2125 and hang@2150
2. MSI RX560 AERO ITX 4G OC - works unstable even at 1950MHz
I've just tested one more GPU:

Adapter  2 (BN=04, DN=00, FN=00, PCIID=00001002, SSID=000022FF)
    Asic Family     :  Polaris11      
    Flash Type      :  GD25Q41B    (512 KB)
    Product Name is :  GV-RX560GAMING OC-4GD/FW0/06F3
    Bios Config File:  RX560GO4.FW0  
    Bios P/N        :  P/N Not Available
    Bios Version    :  015.050.002.001.000000
    Bios Date is    :  01/07/18 02:14    


The result is the same as for the msi aero - works unstable even at 1950MHz

@1377toolz Do you use whole bios provided by Branko or straps only?
What core freq do you use? I have problems with stability with the card until I lower core to 1100 and undervolt it to 775, after that I've got memory to 2100 (with PBE timings, not Branko)
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
Interesting...sounds like problem I have with Hynix version of my Gigabytes...it actually uses 1500MHz
memory and OCs about 300MHz lower than micron...maybe they started using same trick with micron too
I could try other straps if you have some.


It would be great if you could take picture of memory chips, so we can check what frequency
they're rated for...from BIOS, I only see that they use mt51j256m32 revision B, with slightly different
timings than revision A
The chips on the GV-RX560GAMING OC-4GD/FW0/06F3 are marked as 7WB77 D9VVR.
MSI RX560 AERO ITX 4G OC - 7WB77 D9VVR
Gigabyte GV-RX560OC-4GD - 7SA47 D9TRZ

That's the answer why the msi aero and gigabyte gaming behaves in a similar way - they use the same memory chip.

D9VVR is MT51J256M32HF-80:B
sr. member
Activity: 2632
Merit: 328
Interesting...sounds like problem I have with Hynix version of my Gigabytes...it actually uses 1500MHz
memory and OCs about 300MHz lower than micron...maybe they started using same trick with micron too
I could try other straps if you have some.


It would be great if you could take picture of memory chips, so we can check what frequency
they're rated for...from BIOS, I only see that they use mt51j256m32 revision B, with slightly different
timings than revision A
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
Interesting...sounds like problem I have with Hynix version of my Gigabytes...it actually uses 1500MHz
memory and OCs about 300MHz lower than micron...maybe they started using same trick with micron too
I could try other straps if you have some.
sr. member
Activity: 2632
Merit: 328
Hi Branko,

I've tested the strap on 2 GPUs:
1. Gigabyte GV-RX560OC-4GD - ETH 15.6MHz@2125 and hang@2150
2. MSI RX560 AERO ITX 4G OC - works unstable even at 1950MHz
I've just tested one more GPU:

Adapter  2 (BN=04, DN=00, FN=00, PCIID=00001002, SSID=000022FF)
    Asic Family     :  Polaris11     
    Flash Type      :  GD25Q41B    (512 KB)
    Product Name is :  GV-RX560GAMING OC-4GD/FW0/06F3
    Bios Config File:  RX560GO4.FW0   
    Bios P/N        :  P/N Not Available
    Bios Version    :  015.050.002.001.000000
    Bios Date is    :  01/07/18 02:14   


The result is the same as for the msi aero - works unstable even at 1950MHz

Interesting...sounds like problem I have with Hynix version of my Gigabytes...it actually uses 1500MHz
memory and OCs about 300MHz lower than micron...maybe they started using same trick with micron too
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
Hi Branko,

I've tested the strap on 2 GPUs:
1. Gigabyte GV-RX560OC-4GD - ETH 15.6MHz@2125 and hang@2150
2. MSI RX560 AERO ITX 4G OC - works unstable even at 1950MHz
I've just tested one more GPU:

Adapter  2 (BN=04, DN=00, FN=00, PCIID=00001002, SSID=000022FF)
    Asic Family     :  Polaris11     
    Flash Type      :  GD25Q41B    (512 KB)
    Product Name is :  GV-RX560GAMING OC-4GD/FW0/06F3
    Bios Config File:  RX560GO4.FW0   
    Bios P/N        :  P/N Not Available
    Bios Version    :  015.050.002.001.000000
    Bios Date is    :  01/07/18 02:14   


The result is the same as for the msi aero - works unstable even at 1950MHz
sr. member
Activity: 2632
Merit: 328
I've just tried the latest drivers (18.3.2) from amd...

Ok, it was just a waste of time. Completely.

1. AB doesn't work properly with these drivers
2. The 'Compute Workloads' can't be switched on for some of my GPUs for some reason
3. The 'Radeon Settings' software is f'cking sloooooow and extremely f'cking inconvenient (I was very close to smashing my laptop, waiting while the next UI screen is being opened after a button is clicked)
4. I've not managed to get acceptable hashrates
5. Rolled back to the blockchain edition drivers

original old blockchain driveers are known to draw more power
Seems, power consumption is approximately the same for the both.

Branko, what exact version of the drivers do you use, please?


Always latest, only problem from your list that I have is that wattman is slow sometimes...AB
often doesn't work, but I stopped using it long ago because of that

Hi, Branko!
I have RX 560 Gaming OC 4G card and want to try how much better you settings will hash.
But when I try to flash I got an error

=== Flashing card 2 ===
Old SSID: 22FF
New SSID: 22ED
SSID mismatched

 ERROR: 0FL01


Does it mean that you bios is incompatible?

Sorry if it is a stupid question, I do not have much experience with replacing bios with different one, up to now I have was modifying original bioses only.

There are at least two versions of that card (rev 1 and rev 2, my bios is for rev 1)...quite possible there are new revisions with less shaders, too
member
Activity: 239
Merit: 10
Hi, Branko!
I have RX 560 Gaming OC 4G card and want to try how much better you settings will hash.
But when I try to flash I got an error

=== Flashing card 2 ===
Old SSID: 22FF
New SSID: 22ED
SSID mismatched

 ERROR: 0FL01


Does it mean that you bios is incompatible?

Sorry if it is a stupid question, I do not have much experience with replacing bios with different one, up to now I have was modifying original bioses only.
Pages:
Jump to: