This is probably not correct. If I honestly bought XP, why Microsoft ceased unilaterally to support it? Why a new OS doesn't support old hardware? It is clear that I will find a way out of the situation, but why Microsoft considers himself the right to force me to buy example new printer or scanner? My PC is good, but the old sound card Creative. Starting with WINDOWS 8 it has no drivers. Why?
@Palmerson, i'm sorry about this because i know there are lot of people in same boat (who would not like to upgrade instead they prefer sticking to the old OS in order to avoid the learning curve)
Well, let me explain this to you, In computer world where the producer's produce latest version as substitute to the old version so, as to improve security by introduction of more features.
In the case of win XP, it was stated clearly on
MS official website that customer's who intend to continue with the use of the old version (win xp) will no longer received support or update BUT, they should responsible for own risk.
The reason behind this is very simple, the cost of patching & mainteining an old version could end up costing the company than introducing a more secure OS. Just like the cost of mainteining an old car could sometime's be more expensive and pose risk to the owner than buying a new one.
Windows 7 has direct functionalities with win xp but, most people choose to go through the shorter cut & not the most secured cut.
What we are hear & read on the web today would have been the damages that win XP would have created to microsoft if, they had failed to give R.I.P certificate to win xp. However, microsoft was smarter than these attacker's who are now throwing their bullet today in the opposite direction!
Thanks