Author

Topic: Ratimov, do not get deluded by pride or hatred (Read 591 times)

copper member
Activity: 154
Merit: 234
hero member
Activity: 1400
Merit: 655
Bitcoin is achievement


I don't want to argue with anyone here, I just want to write calmly and further improve my philosophical thinking. When some people make unprovoked attacks on me, I just respond as necessary. This has consumed too much time and energy for me,


Actually you have tried by defending yourself but the best option so far base on human thinking is to observe the community or system, and also maintain one account if really you have farm accounts, because some allegations is not real but some is also real but users do as much they can to protect their own interest instead of been sincere, and you have to know that this community is not something someone will create enemity with another, because in any atoms of nonsense they will be atoms of sense
copper member
Activity: 154
Merit: 234


I don't want to argue with anyone here, I just want to write calmly and further improve my philosophical thinking. When some people make unprovoked attacks on me, I just respond as necessary. This has consumed too much time and energy for me.

hero member
Activity: 1400
Merit: 655
Bitcoin is achievement
Please don't mention/drag unrelated users to your accusation.

I didn't make any accusations against others, just put the merit records sent at that time here.
Yeah i understand you, even your objective of making comprehensive of people you sent Merit, i think the reason while all this times is hoping here is because of clarifications, after going through the post i don't think you accused or implicates any user, but with all this things that is happening you have to take adequate control of your account even.
legendary
Activity: 2828
Merit: 6108
Jambler.io
If you can't see the value, it doesn't mean that the writing is not of quality.You should consider whether your cultural level needs to be improved.

And you should learn when to use your alts and when not and when to keep your mouth shut! Cultural level, look at the nerve of this morse code typist trying to paint himself as a man of culture and researcher when his main challenge is actually making phrases more than 6 words long. Academic research, cultural level, listen to yourself talking, or even better read your own work of art and then download real research from the internet and compare the language used in both, probably it will be the wake-up call you to need.

Your "work", your thousands of topics? Zero point one value whatsoever, it doesn't matter how many topics you create when they are simply using the same idea and same wording as each other and done in such a childish fashion. I never bother to check them as from the start there was zero meaning in them, lots of words forwarding no idea, just jumping around between definitions and that all. If you think you will get started with this in a real university you're deeply mistaken you amateur. Let's have a  look at your "work"

1.
Can Bitcoin possibly become the Skynet of human civilization?

Quote
Personally, maybe Bitcoin network itself has no the ability to have self-awareness since its code is basically fixed and has no self-learning gear. However, others can rely on the data on Bitcoin network to develop a super AI system to gain self-awareness and evolve into Silicon-based life forms. With the development of Bitcoin network, Bitcoin has the richest economic data of open source in human civilization that are completely transparent and open to everyone. Different types of AI systems can absorb data from the network accordingly for evolution.
Databases, distributed storage, hash function, asymmetric encryption and consensus are no new technology,  however, Satoshi Nakamoto rearranged them and created Bitcoin, which triggered profound change in the evolutionary history of human civilization. Human civilization is evolving from Carbon-based to Silicon-based, from material to digital.

2.
Bitcoin is reconstructing the world
Quote
Bitcoin is the first in the history of human civilization to adopt technology and machines to nail down and change relations of production. It will have an tremendously profound impact on politics, economy, culture, organizational form, social relations, technological changes and other aspects of human civilization, spurring the evolution of human civilization from Carbon-based civilization to Silicon-based civilization.

3.
Satoshi Nakamoto made machines evolve into life forms of AI
Quote
The moment when Bitcoin was created represents that mankind is about to step into a Silicon-based civilization since Satoshi Nakamoto made it possible for machines to evolve into AI life forms. In a century, when Silicon-based life forms with intelligent robots as the main body have been fully integrated into the production and distribution of human society, they will look up to Satoshi Nakamoto as Father of Robot because he gave Silicon-based life forms the right to participate in social production and distribution through the creation of Bitcoin. That is the greatest significance that Bitcoin brings to human civilization.

4.
Bitcoin, switcher for mankind from Carbon-based to Silicon-based civilization
Quote
So I said that Satoshi Nakamoto created a brand new world for mankind. Bitcoin, in substance, linked the atomic physics world of Carbon-based civilization with the digital Bit world of Silicon-based civilization. As Bitcoin transforms the existing world of mankind, these two worlds will eventually merge into one and evolve into a more advanced human civilization--- Bit Civilization.

5.
Bitcoin, switcher for mankind from Carbon-based to Silicon-based civilization
Quote
Bit Civilization is, in nature, digital civilization, machine civilization and Silicon-based civilization. Bitcoin allowed mankind to evolve from Carbon-based civilization to Silicon-based one, it's a switcher. So what are Carbon-based civilization and Silicon-based civilization?Silicon-based civilization is built with silicon-based organisms as the main body. Computers employ Silicon as the chip. If this computer grows more advanced, it may develop into a smart computer, which is Silicon-based life. Therefore, a civilization formed dominantly by Silicon-based lives is Silicon-based
.

and so on, as you have 4 more topics with the same wording.
Same regurgitated useless shit that you yourself don't even know what it means proven by the fact when actually asked a question you're engaging some gibberish without form.  If you're calling this academic-level topic I'm glad I'm the one that is going to give you the necessary cold water bucket and tell you this is simply a crappy cheap copy, quite ironic if you know what I mean.

Secondary, if you're still wondering why I'm addressing you as being Rainbowkun, it's pretty easy and I will help you understand your mistakes, should I use bullet points for this? Nope!
1)
When somebody is accused of being an alt, the first thing he would do is trying to clear his name, not start a whole crusade of ass licking of the other account, clear evidence that at this point you're trying to save your main account and ditching the other.
2)
Your other problem is that in a sea of people you can easily hide when the questions asks are simple, about your favorite color, even politics, when you're discussing football, it is easy to fake another identity by simply preferring another team and keeping track of that. But when the number of people dwindles, like the difference between the number of participants in the discussions on your topics and the participants in the discussions here and you have to come with different styles of both writing and different purposes for the account involved it comes clear as the sky on a summer day that you're screaming in pain while trying to do this.

Oh, and don't worry about replying to this, the moment I will un-ignore you will probably only come when a negative would have to be added on your farm.
member
Activity: 78
Merit: 24
At least for now, I see that the merits he has obtained are worthy of his writing talent.

Plagiarism can hardly be considered a writing talent.

As defined by the Merriam-Webster dictionary, plagiarism is:
  • to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own : use (another's production) without crediting the source
  • to commit literary theft : present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source

However, I see now that you have at least started adding Wikipedia references to your posts today, so I guess we all learn something new here every day.  Cheesy

You can't understand, so you need to study hard.


I'm not sure how to interpret this. Was it meant as sarcasm?


I just browsed the content, and the plagiarism is still inconclusive, The world doesn’t know what’s going on,
There are always some people who see the excellence of others, and their first reaction is not to learn from others, but to cast doubts first.
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 6706
Proudly Cycling Merits for Foxpup
In bitcointalk, I have always adhered to an attitude of peaceful coexistence. I communicate with everybody in a humble manner whereas I am not afraid of any provocation.
You can still do whatever it was that you were doing before the accusations were made against you.  As for me, I happen to agree with Ratimov and have put you on ignore.  I've only un-ignored your posts here so that I can respond for good and for all, because after this I'm done with this drama and have put all the members in Ratimov's thread on ignore.  I'm not going to read their posts and they're not getting any merits from me.  I already gave out way too many merits to members that I now see were part of an alt account ring, and that pisses me off.

Quantity is not always quality, you might have mistaken and also ignored the fact that a lot of poeple congratulated the effort, not the end result, when we throw in the text spinning and plagiarism the values go into negative.
Yep, agree 100%.  And with that, goodbye RainbowKun and your alt accounts.
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 2581
Top Crypto Casino
At least for now, I see that the merits he has obtained are worthy of his writing talent.

Plagiarism can hardly be considered a writing talent.

As defined by the Merriam-Webster dictionary, plagiarism is:
  • to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own : use (another's production) without crediting the source
  • to commit literary theft : present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source

However, I see now that you have at least started adding Wikipedia references to your posts today, so I guess we all learn something new here every day.  Cheesy

You can't understand, so you need to study hard.

I'm not sure how to interpret this. Was it meant as sarcasm?
member
Activity: 78
Merit: 24

I respect everyone who can write thoughts in words, and I think you should be treated politely.

Every literate person with a basic education can write down their thoughts. What's so special about it? Thousands of people on this forum do this every day.
It is not literacy alone that makes someone wise or respected. What counts is whether you can write words worth reading.

Have you read it? Have you not read it? If you haven't read it, you say that thousands of people do this, I can understand you.

Have I read what exactly? Having read OP's post, I am not overly impressed. It's a wall of text without really saying much.

Nevertheless, I replied to your post, specifically due to the statement "I respect everyone who can write thoughts in words...", which is, in my opinion, complete nonsense.


So if you don't understand it, it's not the problem of someone else's post.
He has gained a lot of recognition from senior members who are active on the forum in a short period of time through his content. I checked his historical posts, and I found that he posts almost every day and is not often active in other sections,If his purpose is It is to obtain Merit and establish his own account farm.There may be a faster way, but he selflessly sends content to the forum,At least for now, I see that the merits he has obtained are worthy of his writing talent.

You can't understand, so you need to study hard.

legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 2581
Top Crypto Casino

I respect everyone who can write thoughts in words, and I think you should be treated politely.

Every literate person with a basic education can write down their thoughts. What's so special about it? Thousands of people on this forum do this every day.
It is not literacy alone that makes someone wise or respected. What counts is whether you can write words worth reading.

Have you read it? Have you not read it? If you haven't read it, you say that thousands of people do this, I can understand you.

Have I read what exactly? Having read OP's post, I am not overly impressed. It's a wall of text without really saying much.

Nevertheless, I replied to your post, specifically due to the statement "I respect everyone who can write thoughts in words...", which is, in my opinion, complete nonsense.
member
Activity: 78
Merit: 24

I respect everyone who can write thoughts in words, and I think you should be treated politely.

Every literate person with a basic education can write down their thoughts. What's so special about it? Thousands of people on this forum do this every day.
It is not literacy alone that makes someone wise or respected. What counts is whether you can write words worth reading.

Have you read it? Have you not read it? If you haven't read it, you say that thousands of people do this, I can understand you.
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 2581
Top Crypto Casino

I respect everyone who can write thoughts in words, and I think you should be treated politely.

Every literate person with a basic education can write down their thoughts. What's so special about it? Thousands of people on this forum do this every day.
It is not literacy alone that makes someone wise or respected. What counts is whether you can write words worth reading.
member
Activity: 78
Merit: 24


Quote
You can look around the entire forum and think about it: how many people could complete such a large amount of writing in two months and create so much value for the forum?

Quantity is not always quality, you might have mistaken and also ignored the fact that a lot of poeple congratulated the effort, not the end result, when we throw in the text spinning and plagiarism the values go into negative.





If you can't see the value, it doesn't mean that the writing is not of quality.You should consider whether your cultural level needs to be improved.



I can't understand many of Mr. Kun's articles, but at least I can be sure that he is a very knowledgeable person. How many people in this forum can have such a large amount of content, and selflessly bring their own thoughts here, please ask 10 How many have appeared in the year? This should be the honor of the forum,
Since ancient times, many famous philosophers and writers in history have received the highest courtesy, and they are more worthy of respect than businessmen,The works produced are praised by the world and passed on from generation .
I don't understand why Mr. KUN published his article here, and was treated so rudely and unreasonably by some mobs here.
Well, from his article, I think it’s just because it’s called "Bitcoin Forum" and it’s because of Satoshi Nakamoto.
But I still think there is no need to waste gold-like words in these illiterate eyes, it is sad.


I respect everyone who can write thoughts in words, and I think you should be treated politely.
copper member
Activity: 154
Merit: 234
Please don't mention/drag unrelated users to your accusation.

I didn't make any accusations against others, just put the merit records sent at that time here.
copper member
Activity: 154
Merit: 234
Some of your image did not clear check it out





I am normal here, you can try refreshing it again,

TLDR

1) Personal attacks
2) Denial
3) Denial
4) Denial and Personal attacks
5) Denial
6) Personal attacks and Self Praise
7) Denial and Whataboutism

Note:
Quote
You can look around the entire forum and think about it: how many people could complete such a large amount of writing in two months and create so much value for the forum?

Quantity is not always quality, you might have mistaken and also ignored the fact that a lot of poeple congratulated the effort, not the end result, when we throw in the text spinning and plagiarism the values go into negative.



What I want to express here is anger. I don’t understand why someone attacked me so viciously in the forum. The quality and quantity of my articles can be evaluated by the entire forum, and they are also supervised by everyone. All my articles are original. I have done a lot of creation. No one has attacked my articles as plagiarism.
legendary
Activity: 2828
Merit: 6108
Jambler.io
TLDR

1) Personal attacks
2) Denial
3) Denial
4) Denial and Personal attacks
5) Denial
6) Personal attacks and Self Praise
7) Denial and Whataboutism

Note:
Quote
You can look around the entire forum and think about it: how many people could complete such a large amount of writing in two months and create so much value for the forum?

Quantity is not always quality, you might have mistaken and also ignored the fact that a lot of poeple congratulated the effort, not the end result, when we throw in the text spinning and plagiarism the values go into negative.


sr. member
Activity: 1064
Merit: 343
Hhampuz is the best manager
Some of your image did not clear check it out




copper member
Activity: 154
Merit: 234
In response to Ratimov's attack:Exposing RainbowKun and His Large Alts Army. Big farm 60+ Accs !!!

Ratimov, you really gave me a big surprise and stigma. Overnight, you made me a huge alt army with 80 people, accusing me of abusing merit of the forum, which is exceptionally ridiculous! I meant to ignore this because I deem my time precious and verbal battle is a waste time and energy. But now I can't close my eyes to it since my reputation has been severely ruined by you.

DO NOT let pride or hatred blind you, Ratimov.

Maybe when you choose to believe something, no one can change your mind. You will try every means to look for evidence to prove your idea, render it sensational and make people in the forum feel that you are a very powerful character. Therefore, from August 18th to 25th, you spent 25 hours concocting varied data and evidence to justify your point of view.


Those data seems professional. Your self-righteous logic combined them together and you draw conclusions, impressing others to grab approval and compliment. At the same time, your sharp language and considerable authority attacked everyone who disagreed. Hence no one replied to that post any more. Whatever others say, you always have reasons to beat back.



I  don't understand why you are so aggressive as to impose your own will on others. However, I believe the public are discerning, they have the the ability to think independently and the ability won't die of your data. I'm no fan of the data you listed. Even looking at the data is wasting my life, so is responding to your insult.


In bitcointalk, I have always adhered to an attitude of peaceful coexistence. I communicate with everybody in a humble manner whereas I am not afraid of any provocation. Nice guys finish last. Here I'll make some statement:



First

Ratimov, I had no idea who you are before this post, let alone the one about helping newbies with merit. And I never volunteered to apply for any merits from your posts. I just checked my merit record carefully and found that you offered me 3 merits in my first article on July 16th issue. I appreciate your support then. Apart from that, we have no contact.


When I saw your slanderous post, I checked your history and found out that you turned out to be a celebrity in this forum. Your anniversary post won you countless praises. I saw talent in you from your history, as well as pride and bossy style. High reputation doesn't mean you can frame others casually. Are you too domineering? Are you the owner of the forum? Are you a policeman of the world?

I say it again: Ratimov, open you eyes. Bitcointalk is not for you only, it belongs to this whole community.



Second

In regard to my life schedule. I declared I came from the east the first day I came here on July 1st. I never shy away from my post and rest time online time. As for country and nationality, I don't think I have the responsibility or obligation to inform you. That is my most basic privacy. If you are really interested, you can ask Satoshi Nakamoto first, to see if he is willing to tell you which country he is from.



third

You said I have 80 accounts. I couldn't figure out why you can be such irresponsible. I registered on September 10th, 2020 and wrote the first post on July 1, 2021. But now you claim that I am schizophrenic, talking in 80 identities on the forum.

So funny. Doesn’t it take time and effort to post in here? Am I a psycho with endless free time? Will anyone ever do such a thing? Moreover, I read the basic information of these accounts, most of which have posted before July 1, 2021 and many of them posted in 2020. They came to the forum much earlier than me. But for you, Ratimov, these accounts are all RainbowKun clones. Awesome, your logic is absolutely impeccable!

We can invite everyone on the forum to look closely at the posting records of these 80 accounts to tell whether they are my copies. No one will make such simple and low-grade jokes, even God.




fourth

I’ll say it again, it's really a waste of time to respond to you. I can only put a limited amount of time every day on the forum. Unlike you, who spends all day here, trying to control everything on this forum. You can spend 8 days, from August 18th to 25th, collecting data and finally coming to your pride conclusion which defames me as a liar who manipulates 80 accounts to earn merit.

Frankly speaking, you are really a clown to me. My time is really precious. I explained my purpose in here the first day I came to the forum on July 1st, 2021.


I am a believer of Satoshi Nakamoto and Bitcoin. In the past four years, I have been preaching for Bitcoin. In the next two to three months, I will launch an independent blockchain DAO project. But before I officially started my new business, I'll record my in-depth thinking on Bitcoin of for the past four years.

Therefore, I spent most of my energy in writing during the last two months, July and August. 50 articles about Bitcoin, part of them have been published on bitcointalk. You can look around the entire forum and think about it: how many people could complete such a large amount of writing in two months and create so much value for the forum? Later on, I will sort out all the information of my articles for everyone to check and see if I can split into 80 different people while writing these articles.

Recently, while writing articles and replying to posts on the forum, I put part of my energy on the development of Rainbow DAO smart contract. Discussing smart contract code and some product logic with my technical team every day takes up much of my energy. This is the contract code that I work on every day:


Now you say, Rainbowkun, you are more powerful, writing more than 50 articles and simultaneously spliting into 80 people to abuse merits of the forum. The funniest slander in the world, isn't it?




fifth

Ratimov,you said that I split myself into 80 accounts, and everything I did was to get the merit. Don’t you think this is the most ridiculous framing? I came here not for merit. In less than two months, I gained 227 merits. You can check my merit records. Why do you merely analyze the interactions between me and some forum newbies instead of analyzing my entire merit record?

Look at my records and decide whether I abused merit or not.  I will organize the complete merit data for you as soon as possible.

aysg76's reply fully explained the process at that time.
See this forum still has huge user base and many posts and threads are being made on daily basis.For example i made a post in B&H section just one or two days ago and if there is no reply to that post it will automatically shift towards the next page and get burried under the piles of other posts and your chances of getting merits get reduced.The other thing is sometimes we like our own posts and that why we have made the same post but other members or merit sources don't find it suitable for merit worthy or similar threads have made multiple times so she won't get any benefit for the same.She is enthusiastic and contributing to the forum which is good thing but your post quality should also be matched with that dedication and sincerity.But if she feels ignored then what you or she can do is :

Report the quality posts in topic=5093271.msg56430959#msg56430959">Re: [self-moderated] Report unmerited good posts to Merit Source

On page 31 you could find that @mv1986 report the post of @RainbowKun in this thread and merit sources and other likes his philosophical ideas about bitcoin and now he has gained 224 merits in total.Sometimes member don't notice such posts and you can't say you are on ignore list so this type of thread can help her.

You can pm any merit source to have history check of your posts and if they find any worthy or quality posts made by you merits will be delivered to you.

Made more posts in some more sections like B&H along with local sub-boards so that your post can be noticed by more members.

On July 28, 2021, MV1986 posted two consecutive messages in the post:[self-moderated] Report unmerited good posts to Merit Source



Before MV1986's recommendation, I had only 17 merits. After that, more and more people learned the value of my articles and some began to send me merits one after another. Until today I have 227 merits, which was achieved by my 307 posts. As of today, I started 48 topics.


I have never begged for merit from anyone and gave away all the the smerits.



You can see my last few records of receiving and sending merit. Short intervals. My current merit available for sending is zero.



I came here purely to preach for Bitcoin. I post mainly in Bitcoin Discussion Economics rarely read others' posts. I don't care about merit system at all. My job is to write articles, publish them, and then respond to some valuable comments. That has occupied most of my energy, I feel exhausted.

Working on these articles and at the same time operating these 80 accounts? Ratimov, I’m a superman with measureless energy according to your remarks.



sixth

Ratimov, you said in your post that I manipulated 80 accounts by myself for the purpose of participating in the signature campaign and the bounty, in order to obtain benefits. I hope you can use your brain to think about the problem? Can framing be so simple?

I have a question, Ratimov. How much time and effort will it take to train the 80 accounts to be able to participate in Signature Campaign and Bounty? Even if these accounts can engage in the reward mechanism after one year, how much benefit can be gained in one month? Have you calculated the cost carefully? You are treating either me or you as a fool.

I said in previous article that I do not lack money. I have never and will not participate in Signature Campaign. When the time is right, I will initiate my own Signature Campaign and Bounty in the forum.

I prepared at least $100,000 for the promotion in bitcointalk. When my Signature Campaign is ready, you're welcome to attend, I will give you the best commission.


My attitude towards making money by this forum.



seventh

The last question, Ratimov, about my relation with the newbie accounts you listed.

The answer is yes, sorely because I do interact with them and that’s all. Some accounts of the lists are familiar to me, we replied to each other and I gave them merit, put this aside, I have nothing to do with them. If, in accordance with your method of statistics, which involves full member, hero and legend, then my alt army is not of 80, but of 800 accounts.

Let’s look at the merit I sent. how my alt army formed.

First, in Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge  of kxwhalexk on July 29, 2021.

This is a poll initiated by kxwhalexk after seeing my article recommended by MV1986, because many people think my article lengthy.

Then you, Ratimov, assert emphatically kxwhalexk is me? Have you ever read other posts of kxwhalexk? Just because he recommended me then we are the same person? Let others in the forum judge your rationality. Totally nonsense.

The recommendation of MV1986 brought me some attention from others, some of whom gave me merits, so that I had smites. I didn't keep them but send to those who responded to this topic for their suggestion and affirmation. Almost everyone who replied to me got merit.

Look at this article. Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.

I gave 20 people 27 merits. You can check it.
Quote
This post received 36 replies. I sent one merit to nearly every reply. This is the final record: I give a total of 27 merits to 20 users.

kxwhalexk  3 merit
ETFbitcoin 1 merit
Lucius 1 merit
The Pharmacist 2 merit
Poker Player  1 merit
lovesmayfamilis 1 merit
Charles-Tim 1 merit
kaggie 2 merit
Shamm 1 merit
StanleyBoyle 1 merit
Jazmin Leslie 3 merit
franky1  2 merit
Pmalek 1 merit
anotherdayyyy 1 merit
nakamura12  1 merit
Kiley33 1 merit
EvieLannister 1 merit
mk4   1 merit
jinneas 1 merit
Roy Asher 1 merit

All these newbies who gave me merit are treated as my alt by Ratimov. They are:
@kxwhalexk,@kaggie,@StanleyBoyle,@Jazmin Leslie,@anotherdayyyy,@Kiley33,@EvieLannister,@jinneas,@Roy Asher
 


However, I also gifted merits to these heroes and legendary members at the same time. According to your logic, is it true that whoever I give to me is my alt?

Then they are my alt as well? My army are supposed to have 800 members!
@ETFbitcoin , @Lucius , @The Pharmacist, @Poker Player, @lovesmayfamilis, @Charles-Tim, @Shamm, @franky1, @Pmalek , @nakamura12, @mk4


The reason why newbies reply to me is probably the high possibility of receiving merit from me, Which is very attractive to them. Very simple.

I figured out my habit:
1. As long as I have smeit, I give it away.
2. Smerits are sent to replies valuable to me, especially those from newbies to encourage them.
3. Whoever send me merit and leave high-quality reply, I'll give smerit back to show my gratitude. I believe many users here have similar habit.


You can analyze all my merit records in detail and decide whether I have the tendency above. My habits made me a farmer with 80 accounts. Does it make any sense?
Jump to: