- 1.After reading such a long article, I was sweating and felt that if I didn't take notes, I would forget it after reading it. There are too many theoretical things. I think a lot of what he said is right. He has strong writing skills, strong logic, and very provocative articles. Maybe he has published books, but I always think he is very idealistic.
- 2.I think who he is and what he does, whether he has made any achievements in the blockchain industry, is not very important, and there is no crown to enter the forum and allow us to read his thoughts. I think it is more valuable. He said that the super-sovereign currency, I am very excited after reading it, if it is realized, it is really Bitcoin that has changed the world.
- 3.I think logical imagination is wonderful, but the most wonderful thing is to give practice. This is causality. I really want to see what he has to do besides writing articles, and then see if what he did is in line with his ideas.
I am a realist, but I really like articles that give me room for imagination.
There is also a very important point.I think that many readers of the forum have limited cognitive abilities, and they are not uninterested in his articles, but they have not yet reached the ability to fully understand his ideas.
Thank you for your approval of these articles. I am now trying to shorten my articles as much as possible. But if we want to describe a complete thinking logic, we still need a certain amount of text support. I don't just want to explain a conclusion, but I want to describe the process of reaching the conclusion. Most of my articles are based on future predictions, which is the evolution direction of Bitcoin. Although most of them have not yet been realized one by one, I believe that Bitcoin will eventually build a new human civilization.
At that time, we were Binance’s biggest competitor. This project is world-famous. But because of some reasons from the founder of the project, we failed in the process of competing with Binance. At the right time in the future, I will tell the story that happened that year.
So you are a big man hidden behind the novice account?
Hahah, oh, I get my own initial reservations now.
I think I turned off immediately because of that post, and it's largely because there are users here every few days
claiming to be some famous figure (like being Satoshi, having a decade old hard drive with bitcoin, or this guy
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.57581914 ), along with all of the new accounts that are created to sell something.
Your post above was also a bit over the top optimistic... even though I would agree.
It's just not your standard introduction, "Hello, I'd like to introduce you to something that will change the world on a big scale."
It sounds like a religious pitch. So, in that context, I immediately turned off. (Not that I'm anybody.)
And perhaps, there was a little bit of jealousy because I agree too much, and thought of writing related things myself.
I find that you use key words, terms and concepts that are discussed briefly in your articles that could also be themes of new posts to provide more background.
Good luck with your DAO and DeFi projects.
Thank you again for your approval and blessings. I am just an ordinary person who has changed because of Satoshi Nakamoto. I now record my in-depth thinking about Bitcoin, hoping to get more inspiration in the process of continuous communication. I firmly believe that Bitcoin is changing the world, and I will follow the pace of Satoshi Nakamoto and use my own power to accelerate the pace of Bitcoin changing the world. I believe that more and more people will reach a consensus on this point. You are also welcome to write your own opinions, we will communicate with each other and improve together.
RainbowKun's topics are looong. They are interesting but not to everyone's taste. The average forum user wouldn't know what to respond after reading one of his articles. I read the first two pieces that were recommended in OP. They are very philosophical and contain an abundance of facts and figures. Although a lot of what he says is his own thinking and point of view, I noticed he doesn't link to any sources or references that would explain the dates facts he. At least not in the 2 threads I read. I am not accusing RainbowKun of anything and it would be a shame if he left or was forced to leave.
@RainbowKun
If you are writing all that from your own memory, congratulations to you. If not, please consider adding some references because there is a lot of data there.
Yes, I wrote these articles based on my own memory. They have all become part of my own knowledge system. At the same time, some of the contents are the most basic historical events. I will make a certain summary of these historical events and draw my own opinions. These are my fragmented thoughts over the past four years. I now record these fragmented thoughts in the form of articles so that they can form systematic knowledge. At the right time in the future, I will publish these articles into books and translate them into different languages for global distribution. I think this is part of the evangelism on Bitcoin.
rainbowkun has atleast shown that he has put some thought into his articles before writing it. but its more philosophical rather than matter of fact.
more "bitcoin should be a one world reserve currency" in about 5 posts i seen of his. as one example of his mindset.
you can tell he has put some sitting back and thinking time, and then some time to write them. but as a newbie he has still alot to learn about bitcoin.
i have corrected a few misconceptions he has made and he has adapted a few things. but he is still in the learning process.
nothing wrong with opinion pieces of philosophy. but trying to write them out as if they are bitcoin matter of facts is a different story. he is still too early in his learning to be trying 'matter of fact' stuff
he is getting there. and i probably would give him merit in future. but just parts of his articles still rub me the wrong way and remind me that he is still a newbie. so not yet at a point of winning merit.
(one article said bitcoin first, blockchain second. .. another article said the opposite way round.. another article said its a database. .. i had to correct him by saying its a ledger not a database. as ledgers have more meaning and better definition of structure and function)
there are other examples where he still does not get the full concept of bitcoin, and just seems too philosophical like he is trying to hype promote bitcoin to newbies without realising for people to be on this forum they have already been though the promotion part to have found and joined the forum.
i have nothing against the deep thought stuff. and its this that makes me half want to award him merit as its surprising to come from a newbie. but he still lacks something which just ends up with me holding back from awarding merit.
nothing against anyone giving merit to him for the little snippits of detail he does get right. but overall. still not always all right as a whole post. so he has some more learning to do.
i think he needs to spend a couple more months asking questions before making posts pretending to give answers. .. he just isnt quite yet there to be giving out 'matter of fact' style articles.
Thank you franky1 for my continued attention to these articles. I have also seen many wonderful replies from you, and they have also inspired me a lot. As you said, these articles of mine are more philosophical thinking. Compared with technical discourse, philosophical thinking is fundamentally different. Technical articles must be rigorous, without any ambiguity. Philosophical thinking is relatively more open, and there is no standard answer. Everyone has different knowledge systems, different educational backgrounds, and different levels of understanding, and the final answer will be different. I also hope to further improve my knowledge system through these differentiated thinking. I also said in the previous article that although I am a newbie in the forum, I am not a newbie in the crypto world. I have a deep understanding of Bitcoin and the crypto world. From a purely technical point of view, perhaps some of my articles are contradictory to each other. But if they are disassembled into different modules and analyzed from different angles, they will also conform to a certain logic. For example, the themes of my series of articles these days are all about the core point that Bitcoin will become a super-sovereign currency in the future. I explained my understanding of Bitcoin from six different aspects: the history of the gold standard, the history of the Bretton Woods system, the Keynes Plan, the Triffin dilemma, the history of paper money, and Hayek's book: Denationalization of Money. Some of this knowledge is related to economics, and some are historical allusions, but they all show that our current world currency system is unreasonable. Therefore, a worldwide economic crisis will definitely occur in the future, and the existing world monetary system will definitely collapse. When the existing world currency system collapses, the people will actively choose to establish a brand new world currency system. This new world order is built around Bitcoin. Yes, what I said is far from being a reality. These are my predictions for the future based on past history and basic economics knowledge. This is the basic law and inevitable choice for the evolution of human society. I firmly believe that the future will become a reality, and maybe it will take 10, 20, or even 50 years. The words I wrote are more prophetic and point the way for the future. I will also devote myself to the evangelism of Bitcoin in this direction to help this prediction become a reality sooner.
