Topic: [self-moderated] Report unmerited good posts to Merit Source (Read 53186 times)

Hello LoyceV

I don't know if it would be a good idea to ask you and other merit sources to review these posts because they are in a local thread, but I will tell you why I am submitting them here. We do not have a local board and no merit sources, either. We are in a single thread, and recently, I decided to read all 565+ pages and sort out the important posts that are worth reading for everyone. Since it's all in a single thread, no one will check all those 565+ pages to find a good post. When searching those pages, finding a tutorial or guide is impossible. So, I decided to list them in different categories, which took me 15 days to read all those 565+ pages, and here is the result. Local thread charts made by Crypto Library.

┏━━━━━•❅•°•❈•°•❅•━━━━━━━•❅•°•❈•°•❅•━━━━━━━•❅•°•❈•°•❅•━━━━━┓

➦ ফোরাম রিলেটেড ইনফরমেটিভ পোষ্ট গুলো	|	Meta
➦ বাংলা থ্রেড এর একটিভিটি ওভার ভিউ	|	Local Meta
➦ টুলস এবং টিউটোরিয়াল পোষ্ট গুলো	|	Beginners and Help
➦ বিটকয়েন এবং ক্রিপ্টো ও টেক রিলেটেড তথ্যবহুল পোষ্ট	|	Technical Discussion
➦ গুরুত্বপূর্ণ অনুবাদ গুলো	|	Translations
➦ অন্যান্য গুরুত্বপূর্ণ পোষ্ট গুলো	|	Others

┗━━━━━•❅•°•❈•°•❅•━━━━━━━•❅•°•❈•°•❅•━━━━━━━•❅•°•❈•°•❅•━━━━━┛

Thank you for your initiative, buddy. I'm sure it wasn't easy to compile all those posts, 550+ pages are a lot.  

To be honest, I used to get sad because every time I posted a translation it got buried under piles of pages. Making an informative post or making a translation takes a lots of efforts and time. And before anyone reads, it's already buried. So I hope, I really hope that we will get more visibility to our local thread as we deserve through your post.

Later Edit: If possible, tell BitCoinDream (OP, of our local thread) to add everything in his first post

snip...

Or do you want me to spend them all on those posts?

I can't read them, and I don't want to spend that much time on Google Translate to Merit those posts. But I get what you're doing, so allow me to go "full Merit source" on the post above. I'll leave it up to you to Merit posts on your local board topic.

I don't know if it would be a good idea to ask you and other merit sources to review these posts because they are in a local thread

Why not? As long as you can commit to some hashed data every 10 minutes, and get it timestamped properly, then it doesn't matter, how much data you want to timestamp. You don't have to push everything on-chain, to make a transaction, all you need, is to commit to that data. And a single signature can handle easily a single commitment, without increasing on-chain size, without making additional OP_RETURN; all you need, is just tweaking your signature in a deterministic way. Which means, that you can commit to a single 256-bit number, in every signature, in every block, without any additional on-chain data, if you only want to build an SPV-like proof for your data.

Why? If you have a single block every 10 minutes, then it doesn't mean, that miners are sitting idle, and suddenly submit something, after those 10 minutes. They are actively trying to build new block templates, over and over again. And if you explore weak blocks, then you can see, if your transaction is included or not. More than that: by exploring miner shares, you can actually measure, how many Proof of Work was already contributed, and provide an SPV-like proof for that, for any hashed transaction.

So, if the difficulty is set to X, then on average, statistically, every second, the whole network produces Proof of Work, equal to 600 times lower difficulty. And you can find a time, where the global difficulty was 600 times lower than today. Which means, that the same power, that was needed to produce a single block then, is spent to mine your transaction now, for every second. If a single confirmation for some amount was safe then, why it suddenly became unsafe now?

For many payments, you don't have to wait for a single confirmation. A rule of a thumb is to measure the "coinbase coverage". If the coinbase reward is 4 BTC (3.125 BTC plus 0.875 BTC fees), then if your transaction sends 1 BTC, you probably need 0.25 confirmation. If you can get a weak block with 0.25 of the current difficulty, then you are probably good to go.

Also, if you want to limit potential replacements, then you can explicitly apply OP_SIZE on a signature, and then it will be guaranteed by the Script, that any replacement will require a given amount of Proof of Work. Which means, that if you can measure other party's hashpower, then you can require putting a given amount of Proof of Work, to actually make a valid second version of the transaction in the first place. Then, you can safely accept for example 0.25 confirmation, because it will reach a single confirmation, before a second party will produce a second transaction version, and broadcast it successfully (also, you can use locktime to control ownership over time).

Because you want to measure, how many goods and services you can buy with coins, that you are currently holding. If you have more BTC than USD, then it makes sense to measure things in BTC. People in other countries, where USD is not the national currency, are measuring everything in EUR, GBP, CHF, and other units. The reason is simple: they have more locally used coins, than USD. And the same is true here: if you have more BTC than USD, then why measure things in USD?

Also, sending round amounts can make it easier to hide in the crowd. Because it is more natural, that more people would send 0.01 BTC than 0.01001234 BTCs. Using round amounts in USD, converted into satoshis, is tricky. It is easier to find two users, one having GBP, and one having USD, and both picking 0.01 BTC, than trying to guess the right amount, which will be round enough for all users, using non-BTC as a measurement unit.

Of course, nobody measure things in meters and kilograms, and everyone is using Fahrenheits. Obviously.

In practice, you have at least two systems, if not more. And if you have some legacy software, then it is hard to change some protocols, when you agree upfront on interfaces. For example: I was working with code, where interfaces sent things in Celsius. To introduce Fahrenheits, we need to convert units back and forth, because old devices accepted messages in old units, and you simply couldn't send them a message with "100F", because they would interpret it as "100*C". And nobody wanted to refactor 90% of existing and working code.

So, in BTC, under the hood, we have just satoshis. We can write software, which will display USD. We can use some tricks, to get millisatoshis. But the protocol is already established, and if you want to send 250 msats, then you need to do some tricks, like "4-of-4 multisig on a single satoshi", to express the fact, that there are four users, owning 250 msats each.

I suggest you hop over to https://learnmeabitcoin.com to learn how Bitcoin transactions work.

A transaction spends so-called inputs, these are chunks of coins, and creates new unspent transaction outputs (UTXO). Any input will be spent completely and destroyed. Suppose you have an UTXO from a former transaction to your wallet of the value 0.2BTC.

Now you want to send 0.02BTC to some destination address. In your transaction the input is your chunk of 0.2BTC, one output is your desired 0.02BTC to some address. Now what about the rest of your input, the 0.18BTC? Something must happen with it as you don't want it to become transaction fee in full.

Remember: transaction fee equals sum(input(s)) minus sum(output(s))

If you don't provide a change output back into your own wallet, then the 0.18BTC would become transaction fee. You certainly don't want that. Therefore your wallet adds a second change coin output, e.g. the 0.17966BTC to return the excess of your input back into your own wallet. The resulting transfer fee in my constructed example will be:
0.2BTC minus sum(0.02 + 0.17966) equals 0.00034BTC  --- 34,000sats seems a bit excessive for a transaction of one input and two outputs, but hey it's just an example.

---

Did you "upgrade" your current wallet compared to in 2017 when your address 1HAdCm5Fo2MG4aDNhw9BQ4YwRPVeVLsHSx was funded with 0.19966345BTC? I'm not sure if Bitcoin Core would switch address types unless you explicitly ask for it.

Both your destination address and change address are now native segwit type instead of legacy.

Monero has always been the King of Privacy Coins, similar to how Bitcoin is to all those other Cryptocurrencies on the Market right now.  This means the competition is HUGE to begin with and it is insanely hard to come up with something better than Monero.  Monero truly has some of the best features a Cryptocurrency can give, including extremely low Fees.

Not only is there this huge competition, but creating a Privacy Coin implicitly involves legal trouble.  How many of us would be okay with knowing our Rights and Freedom is constantly at stake?  You need to be kind of a psychopath to care this little.  I have all the Respect for the team working on Monero for this reason.

And then Monero is already extremely fine tuned to the point where there is pretty much no thing you can currently do to come up with a Cryptocurrency that does Privacy better.  There were always huge flaws found in competing Privacy Coins.  This includes the biggest ones such as DASH.  So obviously, using other Cryptocurrencies becomes obsolete.  Why use DASH when I can use the better, particularly considering that the difference is not as simple or little as low versus high Fees but the flaws one Cryptocurrency has while the other does not.  I need strong Privacy, not one that may or may not be rendered useless by Authorities or any other Third Party.

-----

Privacy is still very under rated.  It will become a problem as every thing becomes digitalized soon.  Only then will everybody start feeling limited and too monitored in all aspects of their lives.  Things are fun until you start realizing that no matter what you do, at least one eye or ear is on you all the time.

But now to answer the question from the title of your Thread, no, this is NOT the end of Privacy.  I would say this is just the beginning.  The more restrictions and limits we will have for our Rights, the more development there will be in this area.  And fortunately, the more people are going to look for Privacy, the more flaws and difficulties will be found and the faster they will be solved.  It will be a wild ride once more people care, and it is going to be fun.

Thank you for the Thread, I have so much excitement every time I can talk about this subject.  I would write so much more, only if I had the time and people just as passionate as I am about Privacy.  These are the times I realize how much I miss Leo.  He was such a great and intelligent human being.

Maybe I'm just hoping for someone to show good posts.

I like the Olympic women cycling

I'm not sure what sports interest you

Finally got a gender for LoyceV

Meanwhile, I have 4000 sMerits waiting for worthy posts.

My man, you've run out of patience in this forum, haven't you?

So you're posting just to share that you're not going to post anything?

I'm not sure which posts I should show you for review.
~
I'm not going to ask anyone to review my posts directly to the profile, especially since I'm not sure which posts you deserve.

Meanwhile, I have 4000 sMerits waiting for worthy posts.

A large number of users believe that merit is the holy grail, and also that older members do not want to give merit to their posts. Many accusations that the merit system is unfair to new and lower-ranked members.
Then we have a thread like this, where it is openly offered to link quality posts to be rewarded with merit, and then you get a suggestion where you need to translate the whole thread from Indonesian to find a post worth merit. A little effort is not amiss if you require someone else to pay attention to you.