The only site I trust https://icodrops.com The Rest of the sites began to greatly overestimate the ratings of the projects.
I will support your opinion. Many projects rated on this platform gave investors X after ICO. 
Topic: Rating sites for confidence? - page 3. (Read 752 times)
The cryptomarket is developing and a lot of people including I have the question about confident sites and resources to find suitable coins for investments. Some of these sites are pay and it is too responsible to trust them not to be confident in the truth of their information in the same time. I am against for trusting to these sites because I am sure that experts’ opinions are more promising in this case and it is easier to believe to the particular person than to different sites. What about you? Do you trust these sites or do you find information in the other sphere of life?
I think for 50% believe and 50% don't believe, nobody really or trusts about sites. It would be better to do your own research and analysis. Although it also doesn't hurt to be one particular source of information. 
If you want to invest in a project in order to get their tokens, then it is not necessary to see the rating on one site. It is easier to enter the name of the project in a search engine and there will be enough websites with ratings. But as practice shows, not all experts make an accurate prediction and not everyone can be trusted.
there are many rating sites at this time, to process the information we need a lot of information, even though 100% of the information we cannot become a size but the site rating is still useful for us, we can compare it one by one ... we can also combines site rating reviews with expert analysis
The cryptomarket is developing and a lot of people including I have the question about confident sites and resources to find suitable coins for investments. Some of these sites are pay and it is too responsible to trust them not to be confident in the truth of their information in the same time. I am against for trusting to these sites because I am sure that experts’ opinions are more promising in this case and it is easier to believe to the particular person than to different sites. What about you? Do you trust these sites or do you find information in the other sphere of life?
Although i do know that some of the ICO benchmark sites do take money from ICO to have a higher grading, if you want to use them try to compare it with a few site to verify the authenticity. I do still use them at times but not a totally believer as i do get coins that is valuable even thought their grading is not very high there/
In fact, you do not need rating sites. If you want to study the project, you can always do it yourself. If information is not enough, then this is in itself a reason to think about whether it is reliable.
Rating sites should not be trusted, it is better to analyze the ico project yourself (if you know how to do it).
I think you should not blindly trust any sites of experts. They always can be wrong or be paid. Try sometimes to trust your feelings.
I prefer to trust expert opinion. I join crypto-trading chat in telegram with professional traders. They often make youtube stream discussing coins.
And they are often paid a lot of money to discuss that coins on their youtube channel, and they are not even paid in coin they are promoting, no they don't believe in it that much!
Sites with such information are not convincing vor me I don't trust them. I prefer to find information with its little pieces and to make a puzzle, such info is more reliable.
I prefer to trust expert opinion. I join crypto-trading chat in telegram with professional traders. They often make youtube stream discussing coins.
And they are often paid a lot of money to discuss that coins on their youtube channel, and they are not even paid in coin they are promoting, no they don't believe in it that much!
Max rating site are ICos but have you seen this site cryptomaa.com which is used as rating website to rate coins
You shouldn't solely depend on all these ICO rating sites, some are paid. I have seen many projects that have good ratings but after ICO ends & have raised enough funds although met hardcap too the price of their tokens drops sharply & the admins of telegram group of that specific ICO also are not active much as they used to be active during the token sale.
So don't depend on all these ICOs I would suggest just wait for the ICO to get over and then see if there is any progress on the project, if so then buy their tokens from exchange else you will be holding worthless tokens.
So don't depend on all these ICOs I would suggest just wait for the ICO to get over and then see if there is any progress on the project, if so then buy their tokens from exchange else you will be holding worthless tokens.
the site rating could not be fully trusted. Sometimes this is just giving an indoor pool of information that does not fit the facts or it could even be said to trap. Maybe there are indeed provide the assessment objectively but it will come back again with different facts. the analysis will better and use the site rating is there only as a last resort to solidify the choice only.
Ratings sites at times are not reliable they do compromise with their ratings having high rated an ICO which might later turn scammed calls for serious scrutiny of those rating sites, I believed investing in ICOs we should not rely solely on rating sites alone there are other areas of researching for feasibilities and credibility of new ICO.
Low and mid-sized investors do not read much about the project, they solely depend on the rating which is given by the experts and their review, in other way, and investors are lazy to research about the ICO. Nevertheless, due diligence is required before doing the investment, most of the rating sites do this work with the help of KYC and deep research in the ICO. However, still scam ICO and fraudulent rating systems appear to deceive the customers.
Since its really hard to determine an ICO project now if scam or legit, that sometimes we tend to see the reviews on them. Its a risk to just rely on reviews but if you already do a throughout the research and sees team reliability. Then the project might be good to give a chance, once you join keep tracking and do follow-ups on their plans and whats. 
Low and mid-sized investors do not read much about the project, they solely depend on the rating which is given by the experts and their review, in other way, and investors are lazy to research about the ICO. Nevertheless, due diligence is required before doing the investment, most of the rating sites do this work with the help of KYC and deep research in the ICO. However, still scam ICO and fraudulent rating systems appear to deceive the customers.
I think rating sites are good for icos and crypto currencies in general
But truth remains that they can be manipulated and the ratings can be rigged with bribery
Best way is for you and I to conduct a comprehensive research ours elves and get it right
Make yourself confident
But truth remains that they can be manipulated and the ratings can be rigged with bribery
Best way is for you and I to conduct a comprehensive research ours elves and get it right
Make yourself confident
Investment? if you talk about it, no need to talk about confidence at all, put that aside most projects say the token is not an investment. Rating sites are totally nonsense.
Jump to: