Topic: Re: [AXIOM] AxiomMemHash, Schnorr Sigs Implemented, APOS 3.0, AXH 2.0 Proposed - page 145. (Read 204903 times)
July 26, 2015, 05:45:33 AM
July 26, 2015, 05:31:14 AM
Code:
error: variable-sized object may not be initialized
uint32_t M[N] = { 0 };
Oh, perhaps you have to replace the N with 65536 so the compiler knows it's a constant and if you don't have uint256 available and must use uint32_t then it will require other changes which I don't know off hand... I'll try looking in a bit.
Edit: I believe the alternative is to compile with C99 then you can keep it as M[N]
Thanks for your help, from my experience I always fail at C++ to C conversions, so I'll just leave it here, there are a lot of other guys here very capable of writing a CPU miner within a few minutes for this algo, I'll just wait for them - pool is ready
65536*8...
uint32_t M[524288]={0}
stupid algo... actually it is more or less pluck algo with shabal instead of sha256
hmm btw int p = (b - 1 + N) % N; <=> int p = b-1 lol
July 26, 2015, 05:15:42 AM
https://bitbucket.org/AxiomCryptocurrency/axiom/commits/ce3bc99bb67ed60c0dd0431a8d7040d5d70a6d86?at=master
Nethash bug fixed! New windows wallet:
https://mega.co.nz/#!0EVlWJhK!kThu21dFCJe6vT63RJksdkds_L53Z_pphoj1ligCS3o
Nethash bug fixed! New windows wallet:
https://mega.co.nz/#!0EVlWJhK!kThu21dFCJe6vT63RJksdkds_L53Z_pphoj1ligCS3o
Worked like a charm! Thanks dev
July 26, 2015, 05:09:04 AM
Code:
error: variable-sized object may not be initialized
uint32_t M[N] = { 0 };
Oh, perhaps you have to replace the N with 65536 so the compiler knows it's a constant and if you don't have uint256 available and must use uint32_t then it will require other changes which I don't know off hand... I'll try looking in a bit.
Edit: I believe the alternative is to compile with C99 then you can keep it as M[N]
Thanks for your help, from my experience I always fail at C++ to C conversions, so I'll just leave it here, there are a lot of other guys here very capable of writing a CPU miner within a few minutes for this algo, I'll just wait for them - pool is ready
July 26, 2015, 04:57:37 AM
Code:
error: variable-sized object may not be initialized
uint32_t M[N] = { 0 };
Oh, perhaps you have to replace the N with 65536 so the compiler knows it's a constant and if you don't have uint256 available and must use uint32_t then it will require other changes which I don't know off hand... I'll try looking in a bit.
Edit: I believe the alternative is to compile with C99 then you can keep it as M[N]
July 26, 2015, 04:53:01 AM
Code:
error: variable-sized object may not be initialized
uint32_t M[N] = { 0 };
And lots of others...
I hate C++ to C conversions.. Thats always where it gets me ;-)
I've got the pool and the hashing function ready, as I can use C++ incudes there, it now just lacks the CPU miner.
if anyone is able to code one, feel free to msg me and test it again my pool, the URL is pretty obvious
July 26, 2015, 04:46:57 AM
Anyone here able to build a (stratum) cpu miner ? got my hashing function ready but i'm not sure how to convert from c++ to c
convert the vector to an array
vectors are just fancy wrappers around arrays.
i'm unsure how to do that with such a big array:
Code:
int N = 65536;
std::vectorM(N);
Code:
uint256 M[N] = { 0 };
Should do it and will initialize all cells to 0, from there the [] operator will work the same on the vector as it will on the array
July 26, 2015, 04:41:40 AM
Anyone here able to build a (stratum) cpu miner ? got my hashing function ready but i'm not sure how to convert from c++ to c
convert the vector to an array
vectors are just fancy wrappers around arrays.
i'm unsure how to do that with such a big array:
Code:
int N = 65536;
std::vectorM(N);
July 26, 2015, 04:40:14 AM
Anyone here able to build a (stratum) cpu miner ? got my hashing function ready but i'm not sure how to convert from c++ to c
convert the vector to an array
vectors are just fancy wrappers around arrays.
July 26, 2015, 04:39:13 AM
Anyone here able to build a (stratum) cpu miner ? got my hashing function ready but i'm not sure how to convert from c++ to c
July 26, 2015, 04:27:02 AM
My node is now online and accepting connections.
addnode 176.9.59.110
addnode 176.9.59.110
July 26, 2015, 04:12:09 AM
https://bitbucket.org/AxiomCryptocurrency/axiom/commits/ce3bc99bb67ed60c0dd0431a8d7040d5d70a6d86?at=master
Nethash bug fixed! New windows wallet:
https://mega.co.nz/#!0EVlWJhK!kThu21dFCJe6vT63RJksdkds_L53Z_pphoj1ligCS3o
Not required, just if you want to see nethash. To see personal hash look in debug.log!
Are there any pool ops interested in making a stratum or p2p pool? Exchanges soon.
Nethash bug fixed! New windows wallet:
https://mega.co.nz/#!0EVlWJhK!kThu21dFCJe6vT63RJksdkds_L53Z_pphoj1ligCS3o
Not required, just if you want to see nethash. To see personal hash look in debug.log!
Are there any pool ops interested in making a stratum or p2p pool? Exchanges soon.
yeah ,, going to da moon
July 26, 2015, 04:08:30 AM
https://bitbucket.org/AxiomCryptocurrency/axiom/commits/ce3bc99bb67ed60c0dd0431a8d7040d5d70a6d86?at=master
Are there any pool ops interested in making a stratum or p2p pool? Exchanges soon.
Are there any pool ops interested in making a stratum or p2p pool? Exchanges soon.
Already working on a pool, just need some more testing, will be ready soon.
July 26, 2015, 03:57:46 AM
WTB 10k AXIOM for staking 
July 26, 2015, 03:33:11 AM
https://bitbucket.org/AxiomCryptocurrency/axiom/commits/ce3bc99bb67ed60c0dd0431a8d7040d5d70a6d86?at=master
Nethash bug fixed! New windows wallet:
https://mega.co.nz/#!0EVlWJhK!kThu21dFCJe6vT63RJksdkds_L53Z_pphoj1ligCS3o
Not required, just if you want to see nethash. To see personal hash look in debug.log!
Are there any pool ops interested in making a stratum or p2p pool? Exchanges soon.
Nethash bug fixed! New windows wallet:
https://mega.co.nz/#!0EVlWJhK!kThu21dFCJe6vT63RJksdkds_L53Z_pphoj1ligCS3o
Not required, just if you want to see nethash. To see personal hash look in debug.log!
Are there any pool ops interested in making a stratum or p2p pool? Exchanges soon.
July 26, 2015, 03:10:39 AM
how can I check if I am on the correct chain?
Is this good:
Is this good:
Its good you can check
http://e.axiomcoin.xyz/
Thanks!
Does this mean I have found a block:
SetBestChain: new best=8971e00a6f35b05f25215ba61bff213e241d9f4dc51cd552186f6b034498dd6a height=559 trust=27321575 blocktrust=6 date=07/26/15 08:00:16
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
hashmeter 45 hash/s
Running Axiom Miner with 1 transactions in block (176 bytes)
hashmeter 45 hash/s
Running Axiom Miner with 1 transactions in block (176 bytes)
hashmeter 45 hash/s
Running Axiom Miner with 1 transactions in block (176 bytes)
hashmeter 45 hash/s
Running Axiom Miner with 1 transactions in block (176 bytes
Edit:
My first transaction just showed up! Thanks for the help guys, i'll leave this puppy running all day
45 hash/s is that ok for solo mining?
July 26, 2015, 03:04:48 AM
how can I check if I am on the correct chain?
Is this good:
Is this good:
Its good you can check
http://e.axiomcoin.xyz/
July 26, 2015, 02:59:39 AM
We've fixed the nethash bug.
Theres a check at the beginning of the function in rpcblockchain.cpp, if the blockheight is greater than lastpowblock a nethash is returned, except lastpowblock doesn't exist so it is always true and always returned 0.
There are about 439 cores on the network:
1M * .00263999 / 6
6 being average hashes per second that we saw in our testings.
We will push the fix soon, non mandatory update. If you want to see your personal hashrate, open your debug.log. Showing it in the console will slow the miner down too much currently.
Theres a check at the beginning of the function in rpcblockchain.cpp, if the blockheight is greater than lastpowblock a nethash is returned, except lastpowblock doesn't exist so it is always true and always returned 0.
There are about 439 cores on the network:
1M * .00263999 / 6
6 being average hashes per second that we saw in our testings.
We will push the fix soon, non mandatory update. If you want to see your personal hashrate, open your debug.log. Showing it in the console will slow the miner down too much currently.
July 26, 2015, 02:58:07 AM
how can I check if I am on the correct chain?
Is this good:
09:58:20

{
"version" : "v1.0.0.0-g",
"protocolversion" : 60015,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 0.00000000,
"newmint" : 0.00000000,
"stake" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 550,
"timeoffset" : 4,
"moneysupply" : 271700.00000000,
"connections" : 18,
"proxy" : "",
"ip" :
"difficulty" : {
"proof-of-work" : 0.00004239,
"proof-of-stake" : 0.00000000
},
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1437895451,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"mininput" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : ""
}
Is this good:
09:58:20

{
"version" : "v1.0.0.0-g",
"protocolversion" : 60015,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 0.00000000,
"newmint" : 0.00000000,
"stake" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 550,
"timeoffset" : 4,
"moneysupply" : 271700.00000000,
"connections" : 18,
"proxy" : "",
"ip" :
"difficulty" : {
"proof-of-work" : 0.00004239,
"proof-of-stake" : 0.00000000
},
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1437895451,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"mininput" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : ""
}
July 26, 2015, 02:47:06 AM
okay..thats enought..more than an hour on the right chain and found no blocks...so...this is the coin that botnet take overall..good luck guys and BYE!
Hi Doremi,
Sorry to hear your frustrations. It's a bit different from the pool mining that many are used to. It depends on your CPU, how many cores, and it's raw mathematical processing power. Also, keep in mind that unlike pool mining where single blocks are divided up amongst all those mining, Solo mining if you hit the block you get the entire block which currently is 500 coins undivided deposited right in to your account for the upcoming stake phase. I would love to hear that you were mining and grabbed some blocks while at it.
Jump to: