Topic: Re: [AXIOM] AxiomMemHash, Schnorr Sigs Implemented, APOS 3.0, AXH 2.0 Proposed - page 80. (Read 204903 times)

people ... its the WEEKEND ...

some of the devs and people have lives they want to live - so the weekend is the only time they have to spend with family and friends ...

i know - i do the same ... weekends are for family time ( for me anyway ) and i will only work when absolutely necessary on the two days i need rest ...

im not defending the devs - but i am saying that your reactions are a little premature dont you think? ...

give it a week - or two - THEN slam them hard about not answering or responding or developing this coin ...

#crysx

So is this coin a scam YES OR NO
or is everyone on the FENCE

Name:    AxiomCryptocurrency
Posts:    88
Activity:    14
Position:    Newbie
Date Registered:    24 July 2015, 12:39:42
Last Active:            Today at 12:34:37 (my current time 12.54pm at time of writing this  )

Dropped by for a quick read... Take it however way ya want 

Well it seems that we are not exactly short of that hitting new lows every minute of two, so you must be real happy.

But only you though.

Great thanks!

Yep, that's correct.

Its more than one person so it may be that they like to work as a group, thus when they can't all communicate as one, they prefer not to be active at all regarding most things; as it is a fairly new project. I am sure once this week comes around they will have a small update. I wouldn't worry, but in the meantime feel free to give me cheap coins.

Yes, the fact that the dev team has been silent all weekend, does not look good. The only positive is that all the seed nodes appear to still be running...

Ok thanks.

..so the more the stake weight the faster the payout? sorry new to this staking biz.. 

I don't have a way to know if these two are the same guy or not but I'll tell you one thing: He has just launched this coin and the first weekend after that he doesn't show up here nor answer very important questions through PM. That's as no good an indication as you will ever have... this side of being anonymous. So I believe your concerns and prudence are more than justified at this point.

Yes, it's called stake weight.

Does the amount of coins you have in your wallet affect the speed of rewards under Staking?

ok then:

1.will it be possible one day to have access to the gpu miner that is running for few of axiom miners that must accumulate and selling at this point much more than cpu miners, and have the possibility to make the market the way they want  ? (and I know that some cpu miners have some nice results by mining with amazon cloud or other)...

2.As it look like axiom has been made by ICM and his team, who has already fooled ppl with crave long-haul (crave is a good coin, but now neglect by the dev, making ppl frustrated and upset), will axiom have the same destiny ? Axiom wallet and crave wallet look the same, that i think ICM is behind it.
Some ppl said the same with bananabits, but i didn't look closely to this other point.

For those two reasons, axiom is not a good coin...another pump and dump from ICM team ?
This dev could achieve great thing with each of his coin if it was made honestly...
I won't invest more into axioms as long as those questions will stay unanswered...

If ICM is not axiom dev that my opinion is false, forget this point

Ummmm. .. someone's going to answer me question?   

So first, the best thing I see about axiom is it uses a different signature scheme than ecdsa. This could either be great, or an intentionally weak signature. Where else are schnorr signatures used?

I saw the announcement on nicehash it got me wondering how to calculate the ROI on building a system with FPGAs and fast memory. So what's going to get better long-term mining returns on Axiom... GPUs, FPGAs, or will there be a sufficient market cap for Axiom ASICs?

This 'cpu only algo' game is like whack-a-mole, fun for a little while, but if the thing ever takes off the only thing you can bet on is there will eventually be dedicated hardware.

The question is: Will the coin promote *distributed* dedicated hardware, or *centralized* dedicated hardware? Any of these promises for 'cpu only' are either wishful thinking, or outright scams by people who may very well already have an optimized GPU or FPGA mining farm running at coin launch.

If you really want to keep out the GPU/FPGA/ASIC crowd, try using something that requires reading random blocks from the blockchain so it's storage I/O limited. This has the added benefit of making sure the miners (or at least pools) run full validating nodes. The dedicated hardware in this case might be an FPGA with SATA port to a terabyte flash drive. In that case you're depending on the growth of the blockchain to obsolete the centralized dedicated hardware and make it easy for distributed mining because flash drives get bigger and cheaper all the time.

They offer SSL certificates that cannot be used to sign code. The certificate needs to have the code signing key usage property included (it is an OID in the certificate) The key usage properties say what the purpose of the certificate is. If code signing is not included the validation of the signature should fail with the message that the certificate is not for this purpose.

namescheap.com do a range of certs and can pay in BTC if thats any help..

Get your buys in, dump starting

It is empty. Is debug logging turned on by default?

Apologies to Epsylon , it wasn't his miner , the Axiom's minerd.exe were copyed into Epsylon's directory - that confused me before. The hacker were archive all the wallets contented info the appdata folder.
2 wallets were drown , 1 of them were encrypted and unlocked only for staking. The other was never locked ( my mistake)...