Topic: Re: RIP Satoshi (Read 3110 times)

I find it interesting that most of the loud voices are big into litecoin when litecoin's current anti-dust relay/mining policy is far more aggressive than anything proposed for Bitcoin.

Did you even think when you started this thread? What's the title got to do with your point. I gather you are talking about litecoin not bitcoin.

He was off topic and hijacked the first thread so the mods moved it.

erk

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 500

I find it interesting that most of the loud voices are big into litecoin when litecoin's current anti-dust relay/mining policy is far more aggressive than anything proposed for Bitcoin.

Did you even think when you started this thread? What's the title got to do with your point. I gather you are talking about litecoin not bitcoin.

El Cabron

vip

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

Quote from: El Cabron on June 15, 2013, 01:23:03 AM

Quote from: El Cabron on June 15, 2013, 12:14:09 AM

Quote from: El Cabron on June 14, 2013, 10:58:04 AM

But it is the more stable and tested coin.

LOL. "more stable and tested" ... is that why all litecoin nodes are still displaying a "Warning: this version is obsolete, upgrade required" error, and have been for months without anyone fixing it? Tongue

Is this why litecoin depends on Bitcoin fixing bugs and lags behind slowly copying security fixes from bitcoin (now months behind) and basically never produces any of its own novel bugfixes? Is it stable.. or technically dead?

Btc was only saved cuz of the centralized mining pools and gavin bribing the operators.

Uh, proof or it didn't happen. That's a pretty serious accusation.

Lol. Public knowledge. Lurk more.

Well, if it's public knowledge, you should have no trouble producing evidence.

You want me to show you the transactions in the block chain or link to his posts in this forum talking about it?
Either way you are pretty lazy for not being able to do it yourself.

Yes, actually, I do. You're the one making the accusation, the burden of proof is on you, not me.

I will email him and ask for a list of all transactions, will post when i get the reply.. Im not sure if you are new or trolling. This was even published in the media.

I'm neither new nor trolling. Simply unaware that Gavin allegedly bribed pool operators.

If you really are interested read his posts or try google. It was not done in secret.

El Cabron

vip

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

Quote from: El Cabron on June 15, 2013, 12:14:09 AM

Quote from: El Cabron on June 14, 2013, 10:58:04 AM

But it is the more stable and tested coin.

LOL. "more stable and tested" ... is that why all litecoin nodes are still displaying a "Warning: this version is obsolete, upgrade required" error, and have been for months without anyone fixing it? Tongue

Is this why litecoin depends on Bitcoin fixing bugs and lags behind slowly copying security fixes from bitcoin (now months behind) and basically never produces any of its own novel bugfixes? Is it stable.. or technically dead?

Btc was only saved cuz of the centralized mining pools and gavin bribing the operators.

Uh, proof or it didn't happen. That's a pretty serious accusation.

Lol. Public knowledge. Lurk more.

Well, if it's public knowledge, you should have no trouble producing evidence.

You want me to show you the transactions in the block chain or link to his posts in this forum talking about it?
Either way you are pretty lazy for not being able to do it yourself.

Yes, actually, I do. You're the one making the accusation, the burden of proof is on you, not me.

I will email him and ask for a list of all transactions, will post when i get the reply.. Im not sure if you are new or trolling. This was even published in the media.

El Cabron

vip

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

Quote from: El Cabron on June 14, 2013, 10:58:04 AM

But it is the more stable and tested coin.

LOL. "more stable and tested" ... is that why all litecoin nodes are still displaying a "Warning: this version is obsolete, upgrade required" error, and have been for months without anyone fixing it? Tongue

Is this why litecoin depends on Bitcoin fixing bugs and lags behind slowly copying security fixes from bitcoin (now months behind) and basically never produces any of its own novel bugfixes? Is it stable.. or technically dead?

Btc was only saved cuz of the centralized mining pools and gavin bribing the operators.

Uh, proof or it didn't happen. That's a pretty serious accusation.

Lol. Public knowledge. Lurk more.

Well, if it's public knowledge, you should have no trouble producing evidence.

You want me to show you the transactions in the block chain or link to his posts in this forum talking about it?
Either way you are pretty lazy for not being able to do it yourself.

El Cabron

vip

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

Quote from: tstang on June 14, 2013, 08:06:52 AM

But it is the more stable and tested coin.

LOL. "more stable and tested" ... is that why all litecoin nodes are still displaying a "Warning: this version is obsolete, upgrade required" error, and have been for months without anyone fixing it? Tongue

Is this why litecoin depends on Bitcoin fixing bugs and lags behind slowly copying security fixes from bitcoin (now months behind) and basically never produces any of its own novel bugfixes? Is it stable.. or technically dead?

Btc was only saved cuz of the centralized mining pools and gavin bribing the operators.

Uh, proof or it didn't happen. That's a pretty serious accusation.

Lol. Public knowledge. Lurk more.

coinerer

hero member

Activity: 1316

Merit: 593

Guys, I think there is space for Bitcoin, Litecoin and others crypto currency.

We are just at the infant stage right now.

The currency that will win is which industry will use it as a payment. (Porn is a good suggestions)

Another alternative is money laundering or money transfer without trace. (Argentina , China and etc)

No point arguing who will win, the strategy is make sure you have them when they are a successful.

As an infant I prefer popcorns Grin

worldinacoin

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Most lot noises maybe, but most hashing powers are still chasing the Satoshis

coinerer

hero member

Activity: 1316

Merit: 593

Quote from: 🏰 TradeFortress 🏰 on May 06, 2013, 03:47:31 AM

Quote from: El Cabron on May 06, 2013, 02:48:50 AM

Quote from: oakpacific on May 06, 2013, 02:33:48 AM

Quote from: 🏰 TradeFortress 🏰 on May 06, 2013, 01:24:49 AM

Quote from: El Cabron on May 06, 2013, 12:58:00 AM

Quote from: El Cabron on May 06, 2013, 11:13:15 AM

I find it interesting that most of the loud voices are big into litecoin when litecoin's current anti-dust relay/mining policy is far more aggressive than anything proposed for Bitcoin.

Litecoin, showing Bitcoin how it should be done yet again.

Please don't tell me you are serious. Go look at the current codebase.

Current? What are you talking about? Last real update was 10 months ago. Grin

Now seriously, I think litecoin is more or less how an altcoin should be done, but not what Bitcoin should have been done.

Bitcoin is litecoins test coin. Litecoin will not get forked and break like bitcoin did.

Litecoin is the conservitive option here.

I enjoy using Lynx. Why would I move to Firefox? I already have a HTTP browser!

haha, should i change to some new browser from my http Mosaic browser?

Mosaic is bitcoin of all http browsers

ny2cafuse

legendary

Activity: 1582

Merit: 1002

HODL for life.

Myspace was first, facebook improved on the idea. so this would support LTC being the best.

Actually, Friendster was before both of them...

El Cabron

vip

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Buffer Overflow on June 14, 2013, 08:59:53 AM

I find it interesting that most of the loud voices are big into litecoin when litecoin's current anti-dust relay/mining policy is far more aggressive than anything proposed for Bitcoin.

The reality is Bitcoin & Litecoin are not designed for micro-transactions. 99.99% of Litecoin code is identical to Bitcoins. Bitcoins problems are also Litecoins.

You will start to see significant change in ltc 0.9.x

Buffer Overflow

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1015