Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns - page 206.

Zyborg

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 256

Quote from: williamj2543 on September 26, 2014, 10:44:35 AM

Quote from: boumalo on September 26, 2014, 10:20:50 AM

Quote from: williamj2543 on September 26, 2014, 07:25:08 AM

Well pocketdice is the only legit one. The other one is a ponzi.

He is a newbie, has negative trust : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=370972 since he is running a ponzi and he didn't come back since the first post offering the sig campaign

Pocketdice is a fast growing casino that takes things seriously and pay weekly so it seems like the best bet at the moment : for 200posts : 0.26/month for Legendary and Staff; 0.24/month for Hero; 0.2/month for Senior and 0.12/month for Full Member

I thought the limit was 100 posts per week. Even if its 50, its still the highest current paying campaign.

Limit is 50 per week, and so far we haven't confirmed that he's actually paying. He said directly no to escrow
but I'm pretty confident it won't be a problem, as the payouts are weekly.

williamj2543

hero member

Activity: 588

Merit: 500

Get ready for PrimeDice Sig Campaign!

Quote from: boumalo on September 26, 2014, 10:20:50 AM

Quote from: williamj2543 on September 26, 2014, 07:25:08 AM

Well pocketdice is the only legit one. The other one is a ponzi.

He is a newbie, has negative trust : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=370972 since he is running a ponzi and he didn't come back since the first post offering the sig campaign

Pocketdice is a fast growing casino that takes things seriously and pay weekly so it seems like the best bet at the moment : for 200posts : 0.26/month for Legendary and Staff; 0.24/month for Hero; 0.2/month for Senior and 0.12/month for Full Member

I thought the limit was 100 posts per week. Even if its 50, its still the highest current paying campaign.

boumalo

legendary

Activity: 1918

Merit: 1018

Quote from: williamj2543 on September 26, 2014, 07:25:08 AM

Well pocketdice is the only legit one. The other one is a ponzi.

He is a newbie, has negative trust : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=370972 since he is running a ponzi and he didn't come back since the first post offering the sig campaign

Pocketdice is a fast growing casino that takes things seriously and pay weekly so it seems like the best bet at the moment : for 200posts : 0.26/month for Legendary and Staff; 0.24/month for Hero; 0.2/month for Senior and 0.12/month for Full Member

redsn0w

legendary

Activity: 1778

Merit: 1043

#Free market

At the moment in the PocketDice signature campaign are present 64 members , and he will pay directly in oure wallet and noth in the site balance:

Quote from: Pocket Dice on September 26, 2014, 08:48:51 AM

Hi everyone,

We've went through all your replies and updated the FAQ section in the OP. Most of the answers are there. Please, do read it closely.

DEAR SPANISH SOLDIER,
YOUR IN-GAME BALANCE HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE SIG CAMPAIGN!!1
AS IT WAS SAID EARLIER, YOU RECEIVE PAYMENT ON YOUR WALLET AND NOT ON THE INGAME BALANCE SO ALL YOUR QUESTIONS ARE IRRELEVANT!
WE REALLY HOPE EVERYTHING IS CLEAR NOW. THANKS FOR YOUR CONCERN!

We also have news for those who still considering joining: We're limiting the amount of slots in our campaign up to 100 users.
And for all those who wanted to know how many of you already enrolled, we've got the answer as well: 64 users, at the moment of this reply.
Here's the list of all the users, since you were also so eager to see it:

....
Snip
....

BR,
The PocketDice Team

virtapayseller666

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Quote from: williamj2543 on September 26, 2014, 07:25:08 AM

Well pocketdice is the only legit one. The other one is a ponzi.

which one is ponzi? can you please tell me the name of the champion

williamj2543

hero member

Activity: 588

Merit: 500

Get ready for PrimeDice Sig Campaign!

Well pocketdice is the only legit one. The other one is a ponzi.

boumalo

legendary

Activity: 1918

Merit: 1018

Quote from: CodyAlfaridzi on September 25, 2014, 09:48:04 PM

Coinprofiters (Thread)
Payment period: Monthly
Minimum posts: 20 Posts per month
Payments: H: 0.0014 BTC S: 0.001BTC F: 0.0007 BTC per post
Miscellaneous: Maximum 150 posts per month, Payments are on 25th of every month, no advertising anything else in your signature, Please do not change it or you might not be paid

Second campaign to offer a nice rate per post, it is picking up!!

Coinprofiters is new and has negative trust though, no one applied, they rightflully request escrow

williamj2543

hero member

Activity: 588

Merit: 500

Get ready for PrimeDice Sig Campaign!

Coinprofiters needs an escrow. The site itself is a HYIP, which is risky so we need it escrowed.

allcoinminer

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 504

Quote from: suchmoon on September 25, 2014, 01:49:51 PM

Quote from: allcoinminer on September 25, 2014, 01:38:41 PM

Generally, its not for those who are ready to get scammed by criminals.
The control, if possible, need to be from the forum management.

Can't really parse out what you're trying to say here but I find it ironic that you are wearing the Pocket Dice signature and at the same time advocating for "controlling" non-escrowed signature campaigns. You could easily control it yourself by not signing up for the campaign.

Yah, that was my point if and only if the management could consider.
I'm too forced to take the risk just because of the free marker pressure.
Its better to take something than nothing even if its "risk".

ACCTseller

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

no longer selling accounts

Quote from: CodyAlfaridzi on September 25, 2014, 09:48:04 PM

Coinprofiters (Thread)
Payment period: Monthly
Minimum posts: 20 Posts per month
Payments: H: 0.0014 BTC S: 0.001BTC F: 0.0007 BTC per post
Miscellaneous: Maximum 150 posts per month, Payments are on 25th of every month, no advertising anything else in your signature, Please do not change it or you might not be paid

IMO no one should participate without escrow on this campaign. The site is all but certainly a ponzi and will likely not be around by the time signature payout time comes.

CodyAlfaridzi

hero member

Activity: 1708

Merit: 541

Coinprofiters (Thread)
Payment period: Monthly
Minimum posts: 20 Posts per month
Payments: H: 0.0014 BTC S: 0.001BTC F: 0.0007 BTC per post
Miscellaneous: Maximum 150 posts per month, Payments are on 25th of every month, no advertising anything else in your signature, Please do not change it or you might not be paid

u9y42

legendary

Activity: 2562

Merit: 1071

Quote from: allcoinminer on September 25, 2014, 08:54:40 AM

Add a field in the OP chart to show whether there are funds Escrowed or not.
Also add a column for Escrow provider.

While I don't agree with allcoinminer's opinion that sig campaigns should in any way be under the control of the forum, I do like the idea he posted previously - adding a column to the OP stating whether or not a campaign has funds in escrow (and maybe mention who is performing the function). Now, it's not as if this is going to stop anyone from joining a campaign of course, and in the end it's up to each one of us to decide whether or not we want to take the risk, but it's still useful information to have, and it would also be a nice reminder for everyone (including new members) that they should always look for this.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: allcoinminer on September 25, 2014, 01:38:41 PM

Generally, its not for those who are ready to get scammed by criminals.
The control, if possible, need to be from the forum management.

Can't really parse out what you're trying to say here but I find it ironic that you are wearing the Pocket Dice signature and at the same time advocating for "controlling" non-escrowed signature campaigns. You could easily control it yourself by not signing up for the campaign.

BitCoinDream

legendary

Activity: 2394

Merit: 1216

The revolution will be digital

Quote from: allcoinminer on September 25, 2014, 01:38:41 PM

Generally, its not for those who are ready to get scammed by criminals.
The control, if possible, need to be from the forum management.

Sorry... No control is required from the management. If u r scared, DONT participate. BitcoinTalk has a standing rule of NO SCAM MODERATION, because whenever u give power to people, that gets abused. Better let the people use their sense, e.g. if u expected CryptcoMiner to continue more than a month, the problem is in your common sense, NOT forum moderation.

allcoinminer

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 504

Generally, its not for those who are ready to get scammed by criminals.
The control, if possible, need to be from the forum management.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: allcoinminer on September 25, 2014, 01:04:58 PM

Can't you guys control this anyway?

Why? If someone wants to take the risk - let them. If you start "controlling" things like that then where do you draw the line and who assumes the liability?

hilariousandco

global moderator

Activity: 3990

Merit: 2717

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: allcoinminer on September 25, 2014, 01:04:58 PM

Can't you guys control this anyway?

What do you mean?

Quote from: BitCoinDream on September 25, 2014, 01:10:47 PM

If u look back the history of Sig campaigns, U'll see they were monthly campaign in general. When some monthly campaign cheat us, we asked for escrow. Now, some escrows again started creating problem with the money they hold. Then came the weekly campaign to gain trust. A weekly campaign does not require an escrow, but as soon as they create problem with payment, we jeopardize their business on this forum. This has happened to PRCDice, CryptcoMiner et all... Weekly campaign without an escrow is actually a trade-off between trust and future growth. If they break our trust, we'll halt their growth... SIMPLE.

Yeah, sadly I think most weekly paying campaigns have started off good and paying out but then quickly turned sour. Some casinos will just be scams from the get go and disappear as soon as they've got enough money, others will want to be in it for the long run and gain trust and respectability over time.

BitCoinDream

legendary

Activity: 2394

Merit: 1216

The revolution will be digital

Quote from: hilariousandco on September 25, 2014, 12:58:38 PM

Quote from: allcoinminer on September 25, 2014, 12:42:34 PM

Quote from: hilariousandco on September 25, 2014, 12:10:57 PM

Kinda 50/50 on the whole not using escrow thing. I think this community should refuse to partake in a campaign until they can prove that they'll pay out, but a week isn't too long to wait and it's obvious many people are desperate to jump on a campaign right now as there's not really any others available.

Without an organised community nothing can be done.
And in a forum like this its very difficult or even not possible to do that.
But the forum staff's or moderators can easily implement a ban on non-escrowed signature campaigns like some of you are putting -ve ratings for suspicious activities.

Staff don't moderate or remove scams or ban scammers so we certainly wont get involved with possible signature scams. I think more people would've called out for escrow had this not been the only open paying deal so they're taking the risk because of that. Still, some money as a bond could've been used to show good faith.

If u look back the history of Sig campaigns, U'll see they were monthly campaign in general. When some monthly campaign cheat us, we asked for escrow. Now, some escrows again started creating problem with the money they hold. Then came the weekly campaign to gain trust. A weekly campaign does not require an escrow, but as soon as they create problem with payment, we jeopardize their business on this forum. This has happened to PRCDice, CryptcoMiner et all... Weekly campaign without an escrow is actually a trade-off between trust and future growth. If they break our trust, we'll halt their growth... SIMPLE.

allcoinminer

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 504

Quote from: hilariousandco on September 25, 2014, 12:58:38 PM

Quote from: allcoinminer on September 25, 2014, 12:42:34 PM

Quote from: hilariousandco on September 25, 2014, 12:10:57 PM

Kinda 50/50 on the whole not using escrow thing. I think this community should refuse to partake in a campaign until they can prove that they'll pay out, but a week isn't too long to wait and it's obvious many people are desperate to jump on a campaign right now as there's not really any others available.

Without an organised community nothing can be done.
And in a forum like this its very difficult or even not possible to do that.
But the forum staff's or moderators can easily implement a ban on non-escrowed signature campaigns like some of you are putting -ve ratings for suspicious activities.

Staff don't moderate or remove scams or ban scammers so we certainly wont get involved with possible signature scams. I think more people would've called out for escrow had this not been the only open paying deal so they're taking the risk because of that. Still, some money as a bond could've been used to show good faith.

Can't you guys control this anyway?

hilariousandco

global moderator

Activity: 3990

Merit: 2717

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: allcoinminer on September 25, 2014, 12:42:34 PM

Quote from: hilariousandco on September 25, 2014, 12:10:57 PM

Kinda 50/50 on the whole not using escrow thing. I think this community should refuse to partake in a campaign until they can prove that they'll pay out, but a week isn't too long to wait and it's obvious many people are desperate to jump on a campaign right now as there's not really any others available.

Without an organised community nothing can be done.
And in a forum like this its very difficult or even not possible to do that.
But the forum staff's or moderators can easily implement a ban on non-escrowed signature campaigns like some of you are putting -ve ratings for suspicious activities.

Staff don't moderate or remove scams or ban scammers so we certainly wont get involved with possible signature scams. I think more people would've called out for escrow had this not been the only open paying deal so they're taking the risk because of that. Still, some money as a bond could've been used to show good faith.

Topic: Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns - page 206. (Read 17849 times)