Recent dadice.com development - page 2.

tspacepilot

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1081

I may write code in exchange for bitcoins.

Quote from: arallmuus on July 28, 2015, 08:47:45 AM

Quote from: fox19891989 on July 28, 2015, 08:33:40 AM

-snip-

There isnt any need to start all over this thing again. The negative trust is some sort of warning and not a sole guidance as people are free to proceed at their own cost. Bringing this matter over and over again wont change any rating of Dadice because if they want their rating to be changed, all they need is to sign a simple BTC address which they refused .

Furthermore, if you got a site that you suspect as a scammer than you will just need to PM few guys on default trust, it is not likely every one of them going on a patrol in scam accusation

I think it's quite well and good for fox to question what QS is doing here. His vitriol regarding dadice stands out and makes one ask why. Yes, others on default trust have neg-repped dadice, but QS shows up in the dadice thread semi-regularly and trolls, and takes opportunities to call them a "scam site" on unrelated threads as well. Now he's bumping a month old thread twice in once day. I think it's fair to ask why.

arallmuus

legendary

Activity: 2562

Merit: 1414

Quote from: fox19891989 on July 28, 2015, 08:33:40 AM

-snip-

There isnt any need to start all over this thing again. The negative trust is some sort of warning and not a sole guidance as people are free to proceed at their own cost. Bringing this matter over and over again wont change any rating of Dadice because if they want their rating to be changed, all they need is to sign a simple BTC address which they refused .

Furthermore, if you got a site that you suspect as a scammer than you will just need to PM few guys on default trust, it is not likely every one of them going on a patrol in scam accusation

fox19891989

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Quickseller on July 28, 2015, 08:26:39 AM

You might want to add dadice_pr to the list of accounts associated with DaDice.

According to this post, it is an "official" DaDice account.

profile link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/dadicepr-538753

You claim dadice is a scam site in the profile, and you bumped this dead thread again, why do u hate dadice so much, they paid u a lot in sig campaign, and currently we don't see any proofs that dadice refuses to pay.

But satoshidice is indeed scamming people, why u guys don't give SD neg rate?

Also I have post a thread in scam accusation to claim PMpoker is a scam site, I have solid proofs, but none of you guys gave him neg rate.

It is unfair to give dadice neg rate but don't give neg rate to real sites.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: shorena on May 31, 2015, 09:12:13 AM

Quote from: DiamondCardz on May 30, 2015, 05:38:11 AM

OT, so dadice is still refusing to verify cold storages? I plan to add an entry for them to my Overview thread today, so if they still are...the ratings are gonna drop.

AFAIK they just disabled the option to invest and ignored everything afterwards. I think its reasonable to assume that one of them would contact me directly or via proxy should they make a a signed message public verifying their funds. I will certainly change the OP and my rating and let you know here when this happens.

No, they actually hid the option to invest while publicly saying they were not accepting investments. This was brought to light when this scam accusation was opened against them.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

You might want to add dadice_pr to the list of accounts associated with DaDice.

According to this post, it is an "official" DaDice account.

profile link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/dadicepr-538753

erwin45hacked

legendary

Activity: 1064

Merit: 1000

Quote from: sguegliam on May 31, 2015, 01:11:05 PM

Sorry but i don't have understand, the problem of webmasters don't add a prove to cold wallet is only for investor or also for players?

Both of them are in risk because if a site could not provide a solvency proof then there is a chance that the site might turn out to be a scam site. That is why most gambling site provide their cold address to prove solvency, so that people could play there without worrying about their withdrawal not getting through

sguegliam

sr. member

Activity: 383

Merit: 250

Sorry but i don't have understand, the problem of webmasters don't add a prove to cold wallet is only for investor or also for players?

amiryaqot

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1000

Quote from: NorrisK on May 31, 2015, 09:27:31 AM

After reading this thread in happy that I decided to join a different campaign for now... This feedback is not good for any service. Although it seems their manager has returned to the campaign thread!

when you was part of this campaign i didn't see you there even in archives list too, i didn't agree with agree with your post that is totally misleading as they are using funds of escrow for their campaign and paying the competitive rates for this.

NorrisK

legendary

Activity: 1946

Merit: 1007

After reading this thread in happy that I decided to join a different campaign for now... This feedback is not good for any service. Although it seems their manager has returned to the campaign thread!

shorena

copper member

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1528

No I dont escrow anymore.

Quote from: DiamondCardz on May 30, 2015, 05:38:11 AM

-snip-

Yeah, my bad it is off-topic, I guess it only slightly relates in that dadice runs a signature campaign. Was just answering a question I saw though.

Im fine with offtopic replies as long as its not derailing the thread, but if you start a parallel discussion its probably best to move it elsewhere.

Quote from: DiamondCardz on May 30, 2015, 05:38:11 AM

OT, so dadice is still refusing to verify cold storages? I plan to add an entry for them to my Overview thread today, so if they still are...the ratings are gonna drop.

AFAIK they just disabled the option to invest and ignored everything afterwards. I think its reasonable to assume that one of them would contact me directly or via proxy should they make a a signed message public verifying their funds. I will certainly change the OP and my rating and let you know here when this happens.

Quote from: a1choi on May 30, 2015, 01:33:16 PM

lets hope this doesn't turn into another shitshow like dicebitcoin and dice.ninja

fingers crossed.

a1choi

sr. member

Activity: 323

Merit: 254

lets hope this doesn't turn into another shitshow like dicebitcoin and dice.ninja

DiamondCardz

legendary

Activity: 1134

Merit: 1118

Quote from: shorena on May 30, 2015, 05:18:16 AM

Quote from: DiamondCardz on May 30, 2015, 03:36:14 AM

Quote from: Wendigo on May 30, 2015, 03:11:49 AM

Quote from: DiamondCardz on May 30, 2015, 03:02:28 AM

Quote from: Wendigo on May 30, 2015, 02:39:22 AM

Why doesn't devthedev or whoever is running the show code a counting bot that will pay automatically after a line of writing and spare himself all the hassle.

For signature campaigns? Posts need to be checked and things like that. I was tempted to make a website where signature campaign managers can offer their services, signature campaign owners can go to find a manager, and people who want to participate in a signature campaign can go to find one but I can't be bothered. Even that would only save the log side of things e.g. spreadsheets. Managers are basically a necessity.

A necessity for what exactly? The forum has been ridden with spam scams and drama and people go to learn about bitcoins to other sources of information. The circle jerk is running this shitshow here anyway.

That is kind of true, but Bitcointalk is still quite large and obviously the (mostly casinos) companies/people who want to run signature campaigns find some kind of benefit from it else they wouldn't pay for them. You can't really argue with the money-flow.

#1 what does this have to do with the topic at hand?

Yeah, my bad it is off-topic, I guess it only slightly relates in that dadice runs a signature campaign. Was just answering a question I saw though.

OT, so dadice is still refusing to verify cold storages? I plan to add an entry for them to my Overview thread today, so if they still are...the ratings are gonna drop.

shorena

copper member

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1528

No I dont escrow anymore.

Quote from: DiamondCardz on May 30, 2015, 03:36:14 AM

Quote from: Wendigo on May 30, 2015, 03:11:49 AM

Quote from: DiamondCardz on May 30, 2015, 03:02:28 AM

Quote from: Wendigo on May 30, 2015, 02:39:22 AM

Why doesn't devthedev or whoever is running the show code a counting bot that will pay automatically after a line of writing and spare himself all the hassle.

For signature campaigns? Posts need to be checked and things like that. I was tempted to make a website where signature campaign managers can offer their services, signature campaign owners can go to find a manager, and people who want to participate in a signature campaign can go to find one but I can't be bothered. Even that would only save the log side of things e.g. spreadsheets. Managers are basically a necessity.

A necessity for what exactly? The forum has been ridden with spam scams and drama and people go to learn about bitcoins to other sources of information. The circle jerk is running this shitshow here anyway.

That is kind of true, but Bitcointalk is still quite large and obviously the (mostly casinos) companies/people who want to run signature campaigns find some kind of benefit from it else they wouldn't pay for them. You can't really argue with the money-flow.

#1 what does this have to do with the topic at hand?

#2 if you want to advertise your siganture (as you both do) and/or buy the signature from someone else for advertising purposes it is in your interest to make sure that spam is dealt with. Preferably not by admins. BadBear has been swinging the ban hammer very well, but there will be a point where they are just sick of it and just bad signature campaigns. If you think a bot can handle this you are mistaken. You will need a human to judge the quality of a post in its context (for now). Marcotheminer is using a bot to assist the count, but AFAIK is still doing manual checks. Ndnhc et al. are very strict which posts/users they pay for which is a good development and takes some of the burden from the staff.

DiamondCardz

legendary

Activity: 1134

Merit: 1118

Quote from: Wendigo on May 30, 2015, 03:11:49 AM

Quote from: DiamondCardz on May 30, 2015, 03:02:28 AM

Quote from: Wendigo on May 30, 2015, 02:39:22 AM

Why doesn't devthedev or whoever is running the show code a counting bot that will pay automatically after a line of writing and spare himself all the hassle.

For signature campaigns? Posts need to be checked and things like that. I was tempted to make a website where signature campaign managers can offer their services, signature campaign owners can go to find a manager, and people who want to participate in a signature campaign can go to find one but I can't be bothered. Even that would only save the log side of things e.g. spreadsheets. Managers are basically a necessity.

A necessity for what exactly? The forum has been ridden with spam scams and drama and people go to learn about bitcoins to other sources of information. The circle jerk is running this shitshow here anyway.

That is kind of true, but Bitcointalk is still quite large and obviously the (mostly casinos) companies/people who want to run signature campaigns find some kind of benefit from it else they wouldn't pay for them. You can't really argue with the money-flow.

mashcom

full member

Activity: 189

Merit: 100

What will happen if someone ask to stunna %post your cold storage address%? DaDice should post the proof or they are only scammer.

Wendigo

legendary

Activity: 2604

Merit: 1036

Quote from: DiamondCardz on May 30, 2015, 03:02:28 AM

Quote from: Wendigo on May 30, 2015, 02:39:22 AM

Why doesn't devthedev or whoever is running the show code a counting bot that will pay automatically after a line of writing and spare himself all the hassle.

For signature campaigns? Posts need to be checked and things like that. I was tempted to make a website where signature campaign managers can offer their services, signature campaign owners can go to find a manager, and people who want to participate in a signature campaign can go to find one but I can't be bothered. Even that would only save the log side of things e.g. spreadsheets. Managers are basically a necessity.

A necessity for what exactly? The forum has been ridden with spam scams and drama and people go to learn about bitcoins to other sources of information. The circle jerk is running this shitshow here anyway.

DiamondCardz

legendary

Activity: 1134

Merit: 1118

Quote from: Wendigo on May 30, 2015, 02:39:22 AM

Why doesn't devthedev or whoever is running the show code a counting bot that will pay automatically after a line of writing and spare himself all the hassle.

For signature campaigns? Posts need to be checked and things like that. I was tempted to make a website where signature campaign managers can offer their services, signature campaign owners can go to find a manager, and people who want to participate in a signature campaign can go to find one but I can't be bothered. Even that would only save the log side of things e.g. spreadsheets. Managers are basically a necessity.

Wendigo

legendary

Activity: 2604

Merit: 1036

Why doesn't devthedev or whoever is running the show code a counting bot that will pay automatically after a line of writing and spare himself all the hassle.

Light

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 502

Circa 2010

Quote from: XinXan on May 30, 2015, 01:26:43 AM

Well if i was wearing their signature i would be worried that in the future i might not get paid. They could run with all the money and never come back soon enough, its not like they would be the first ones to do so, there have been a good amount of casinos that scammed unfortunately.

For people saying, but why would they invest in sig campaigns and giveaways, well its simple and obvious, the more customers the more money they can steal if they plan to scam afterall.

As far as I'm aware they found themselves another campaign manager in the interim (can't recall who it is at the moment), so most of the campaign participants don't seem to be worried.

What I'm more curious about is if they've refunded everyone who was invested there? I haven't looked very hard for it yet - so I'm not up to date on whether investments have been repaid or not - only that they refuse to show proof of funds.

XinXan

hero member

Activity: 1064

Merit: 505

Quote from: FruitsBasket on May 29, 2015, 05:37:54 PM

Quote from: XinXan on May 29, 2015, 12:56:05 AM

Yea with accusation against ndnhc this just seems really bad for dadice, at this point who knows what role has ndnhc really on that site. Furthermore i told them in their thread that they now have an obligation to show funds not because of investments but because of the neg trust. I mean if you were they and you had that amount of neg trust and the only way to get rid of it would be to show the funds, why woulndt you do it?

If i was participating in their sig campaign i would quit asap.

nah, they're still getting BTC from the signature.. why would they quit Tongue

Well if i was wearing their signature i would be worried that in the future i might not get paid. They could run with all the money and never come back soon enough, its not like they would be the first ones to do so, there have been a good amount of casinos that scammed unfortunately.

For people saying, but why would they invest in sig campaigns and giveaways, well its simple and obvious, the more customers the more money they can steal if they plan to scam afterall.

Topic: Recent dadice.com development - page 2. (Read 7980 times)