Pages:
Author

Topic: Red Trust Manager? - page 2. (Read 708 times)

hero member
Activity: 2926
Merit: 567
November 10, 2019, 09:31:22 PM
#29
Doesn't red trust mean symbolize bad image?
if so, do you still believe in projects managed by well-known managers who have red trust?

and frankly like @Wapinter

It depends on how did they got that red trust if they've got it from scamming bounty hunters, then he is not worthy of trust by bounty hunters, but if it is because of the work of the project that he is working on that he has no control of, then that trust means nothing to me, bounty managers has no control of the works of developers.
hero member
Activity: 2464
Merit: 550
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
November 10, 2019, 09:27:14 PM
#28
Doesn't red trust mean symbolize bad image?
if so, do you still believe in projects managed by well-known managers who have red trust?

and frankly like @Wapinter
there is indeed a sense of curiosity about the bounty manager who has the red trust, but for the bounty manager wapinter I think it can still be trusted even though some projects can be successful but it is not the fault of the bounty manager because he only runs his job whereas when the project is scam then it is a mistake of its founder.
hero member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 785
November 10, 2019, 09:23:54 PM
#27
Red Trush will indeed greatly affect the confidence of participants in the bounty manager. when the wapinter still didn't have Red Trush many followed the project. But after the Wapinter was given the Red Trush, some bounty hunters no longer believed in the project he was managing. But not all projects managed are problematic, there are some projects that are successful and proven to pay bounty hunters. Maybe it was an unintentional mistake made by the Wapinter, so getting a Red Trush.
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1024
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
November 10, 2019, 09:14:52 PM
#26
Doesn't red trust mean symbolize bad image?
if so, do you still believe in projects managed by well-known managers who have red trust?

and frankly like @Wapinter
That depends on the case that has already made the bounty manager was getting red-trust. But it looks like that problem that has already obtained by him (wapinter) was a severe problem and that guy is having a bad image. what you need to do to see what was the accusations that already written for him.
Red trust means symbolize bad image but not every time that will bring someone to the wrong image.
As far as I know that even some shillers are not doing something wrong (based on my opinion) also got red-trust.
But as per wapinter's trust summary and I don't believe him as well as all of the accusations for wapinter was about running scam project
sr. member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 256
November 10, 2019, 08:16:55 PM
#25
Red trust is given because someone violates or commits an act that is not good. Whether it's cheaters, scammers, fraudsters, or others. There are many reasons for this, of course, sometimes the reasons are less grounded. Because everyone can give red trust even though the mistake is not too fatal.
I once participated in the bounty Wapinter, I think he is a person who can carry out his duties as a manager well, yes even though sometimes there are projects that are delayed but that is not his fault.
Everyone can change, but the sign of the red trust never disappears even though he has done his best. So judge according to how he treats you not from what others say.
full member
Activity: 924
Merit: 100
GoMeat - Digitalizing Meat Stores - ICO
November 10, 2019, 08:10:35 PM
#24
Doesn't red trust mean symbolize bad image?
if so, do you still believe in projects managed by well-known managers who have red trust?

and frankly like @Wapinter

Wapinter is one of the bounty managers who has been around for a long time and is trusted by many bounty hunters. In my opinion, Red Trust depends on the mistakes made and sometimes the Red Trust giver is also not free from mistakes and they give red trust based only on assumptions.
sr. member
Activity: 882
Merit: 260
November 10, 2019, 07:53:08 PM
#23
Doesn't red trust mean symbolize bad image?
if so, do you still believe in projects managed by well-known managers who have red trust?

and frankly like @Wapinter
Depends on the reason why they were tagged in the first place. If the tag is simply not correlated nor related to the project he's handling then there is no reason why not to give a shot. I'm not supporting it but we shouldn't judge them falsely. Although we can't put out that they aren't worth to be trusted, we still can't deny to consider evaluating them first.
sr. member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 284
November 10, 2019, 07:52:20 PM
#22
@Wapinter is the best manager and has managed the bounty for a long time, many bounties have successfully paid for it, and I think if the @Wapinter account is Red Trush but he still gives the best to the participants, it means that he does not cheat in managing the bounty.
But unfortunately I have not seen the bounty launched by him.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
November 10, 2019, 07:47:03 PM
#21
The pharmacist says he is legit, suchmoon says he is not to be trusted. Yahoo says he is ok too. :/ Too many different opinions...

Thanks for triggering my Maggiordomo alert, let me explain.

I think my rating on Wapinter is factual and has a proper reference. Read the linked thread and decide for yourselves what the risks are, don't just look at the red and green numbers. That applies to all trust ratings and flags. The trust system is there to help you make decisions, not to make decisions for you.
full member
Activity: 527
Merit: 113
November 10, 2019, 07:43:39 PM
#20
Depends on the case mate. But I think having red trust is also a big factor on participants. Of course this is a bad image, meaning they have been reported to some DT about their handled campaign maybe doesn't pay participants or have serious issue. Wapinter have been flagged negative trust without a valid reason but I dont think its the whole story for him. I still he have campaign participants meaning, maybe the issue arent that strong.
sr. member
Activity: 1652
Merit: 262
November 10, 2019, 07:19:40 PM
#19
Doesn't red trust mean symbolize bad image?
if so, do you still believe in projects managed by well-known managers who have red trust?

and frankly like @Wapinter
of course not. Logically, only participants who have a red trust cannot join, and if the manager alone has a red trust, then what will the rules look like? this is very hard to believe, and if the manager has a red trust, then participants with red trust can also participate, surely the project is not good. What's more, a red trust is a symbol of a negative account.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1855
Rollbit.com | #1 Solana Casino
November 10, 2019, 07:10:03 PM
#18
Although the wapinter has Red Trush, there are still many bounties that he manages and many participants participate. Wapinter is one of the top bounty managers at the moment. I have participated in many projects and been paid. Regarding the red trush problem, there was indeed a mistake he made because he was promoting a scam project, but that had been a long time since.
hero member
Activity: 2828
Merit: 518
November 10, 2019, 06:54:16 PM
#17
If we could see red paint on their names it doesn't mean that they are an untrusted person. There is something we need to figure out what it happens and what makes this red paint on his name, we can't simply judge on it.

I appreciate how Wapinter does with their bounty campaigns, in fact, I'm one of his participants before and everything went so well.
But for those other BM, who has a proven bad claim, we shouldn't have to trust them. They will surely scam again and again cause they never care about their reputation.
copper member
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1305
Limited in number. Limitless in potential.
November 10, 2019, 06:45:30 PM
#16
Doesn't red trust mean symbolize bad image?
Of course, yes, especially if the tag was really accurate and proved with some evidence.

And scamming its bounties its managing, e.i. deducting the rewards/stake of participants, proven that applying its alts on the campaign, and etc. Those BM who has this kind of tag should be avoided.

But those red tags with 'managing scam projects' should be considered coz its too hard to say if a project will turn to scam especially if they have with better idea/mvp/whitepaper and etc. And the BM is one of the victims as well.
sr. member
Activity: 645
Merit: 266
November 10, 2019, 06:34:27 PM
#15
Surely that manager have bad image on his past campaign. I think you must be wisely to join every project that managed by those people. Look at their profile why he got red trust and you must avoid that case in the next time with other guy.
legendary
Activity: 2226
Merit: 1086
duelbits.com
November 10, 2019, 06:27:51 PM
#14
Doesn't red trust mean symbolize bad image?
if so, do you still believe in projects managed by well-known managers who have red trust?

Basically, yes. Red-trust means an untrusted member, including a bounty manager. But they got it from various cases, just look at what the case is. If the case has no correlation with the bounty, it is no problem I think. However, for me, the better option is surely a bounty manager with a good reputation.



Note :
I think you don't need to include "@Wapinter" on your thread above. There are still many worse managers. It is not a place to judge him!!
Why don't you just stated a red-trust bounty manager, no need an example. I think it is clear enough.  
copper member
Activity: 83
Merit: 7
November 10, 2019, 06:24:40 PM
#13
Doesn't red trust mean symbolize bad image?
if so, do you still believe in projects managed by well-known managers who have red trust?

and frankly like @Wapinter
I don't believe any admin, I only believe in projects, here this two are different Hhampuz and Yahoo62278. I will believe project that looks good to me, negative trust doesn't mean to me anything. Because negative isn't flash for everything. Wapinter is also good as Arteezy.rtx and Btcltcdigger
full member
Activity: 896
Merit: 108
November 10, 2019, 06:04:51 PM
#12
Snip
Yes, because some managers were given a negative trust for other reasons. It is also better to check on personal experience, it happens that the manager has a red trust, but he always keeps his promises.
because giving red trust could be due to other reasons that have nothing to do with the bounty campaign.  we really should focus more on the performance of the manager's bounty and project strength.  Remember, the success of a bounty is not only based on who is handling it, but many other factors influence such as the bounty pool, market capacity, etc.
sr. member
Activity: 560
Merit: 269
November 10, 2019, 05:59:45 PM
#11
Wapinter is good manager. But some of the projects he managed was turned to be a scam. Some Bounty participants tagged him for that. That's the problem about being about Bounty manager. They just care about earning because as far as I know, they accept only btc, Eth or any valuable cryptocurrency not the token offered by the project. I think wapinter never eveluate things before proceeding. But I'm happy that many members here are now more concern about new projects. They tagged the manager before many people scammed by the fake project.
sr. member
Activity: 910
Merit: 250
Proof-of-Stake Blockchain Network
November 10, 2019, 05:17:54 PM
#10
Doesn't red trust mean symbolize bad image?
if so, do you still believe in projects managed by well-known managers who have red trust?

and frankly like @Wapinter
Yes, because some managers were given a negative trust for other reasons. It is also better to check on personal experience, it happens that the manager has a red trust, but he always keeps his promises.
Pages:
Jump to: