Isn't it unfair?
Most of the bounty managers has red trust but they never accept red trusted participants mostly on their signature campaign. If ico making this decision so why are they hiring a red trusted manager?
Yeah it's unfair but We need to accept the reality, we can't command the choices of the project owner who manager they want to handle of their project to advertise.
There has a reason for every red trust. If it relates any kind of cheating, scamming, multiple activities in bounties then bounty manager can easily reject them! For example, Wapinter is red trust tagged bounty manager but there is no doubt that he is a reputed bounty manager and he is running many bounties successfully. But you will find in his every bounty that red trust people are not allowed! It is because they can cheat again, or the ICO owner doesn't allow this, but yet they hired wapinter because he has many successful campaigns, he has an active community and for others reason!
Agreed some of the manager they get red trust because didn't pay to participant for their participation, but we can't force ut because simetimes manager is also a victim of the fake project.
