I've wrote this before in the another thread, it's odd @Thenoss edited all of his bounty reports, that's why I open a discussion about this issues.
Can you comment on this?https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.60221849
Topic: {Reference} Detailed reasons why you recieve a red feedback from me [campaigns]. - page 2. (Read 2402 times)
June 06, 2022, 01:06:33 AM
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.60221849
legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 4133
eXch.cx - Automatic crypto Swap Exchange.
June 05, 2022, 11:26:23 AM
List of addresses associated with cheaters using others information with a different address in order to get rewards in campaign under my management.
I just discovered a new trend in which involves cheaters using profile of already accepted participants to get reward, they usually altered the usernames so it doesn't match on spreedsheet but links are to others account and foolishly some use this same addresses in the future to enroll in campaigns. A list will be kept to help catch them.
Addresses and campaign cheating on;
Case 004: Impersonation.
Details; irefenx@ is guilty of been associated with an address that has been tagged to be a cheater due to it been used for impersonation in the Seasonal Tokens 2.0 (signature) campaign, spreedsheet number 45.
Proof:
Judgement: Red trust for impersonation.
I just discovered a new trend in which involves cheaters using profile of already accepted participants to get reward, they usually altered the usernames so it doesn't match on spreedsheet but links are to others account and foolishly some use this same addresses in the future to enroll in campaigns. A list will be kept to help catch them.
Addresses and campaign cheating on;
Code:
1: 3QEPHELXQzfBc4YSRGGX7J1pocxbCfRNnp Seasonal Tokens 2.0 (signature) Campaign.
2: 3M5VL6op54du8ni3CipC8tm2BxbwNYMu5Q Seasonal Tokens 2.0 (signature) Campaign.
3: bc1qnle6nk8tms5cntw5m6jtkn4dg9ka2gytcmyamr Seasonal Tokens 2.0 (signature) Campaign.
4: bc1qgk4a6ughze3fxj9krteel4axkngxncdk6wr8rq Seasonal Tokens 1.0 (signature) Campaign.
2: 3M5VL6op54du8ni3CipC8tm2BxbwNYMu5Q Seasonal Tokens 2.0 (signature) Campaign.
3: bc1qnle6nk8tms5cntw5m6jtkn4dg9ka2gytcmyamr Seasonal Tokens 2.0 (signature) Campaign.
4: bc1qgk4a6ughze3fxj9krteel4axkngxncdk6wr8rq Seasonal Tokens 1.0 (signature) Campaign.
Case 004: Impersonation.
Details; irefenx@ is guilty of been associated with an address that has been tagged to be a cheater due to it been used for impersonation in the Seasonal Tokens 2.0 (signature) campaign, spreedsheet number 45.
Proof:
Proof of Authentication
Format:#Proof Of Registration
Forum Username: irefenx@
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/irefenx-3404939;sa=summary
Telegram Username: @irefenx
Participated Campaigns: video
Bitcoin Wallet Address: bc1qnle6nk8tms5cntw5m6jtkn4dg9ka2gytcmyamr
Archive: https://ninjastic.space/address/bc1qnle6nk8tms5cntw5m6jtkn4dg9ka2gytcmyamrFormat:#Proof Of Registration
Forum Username: irefenx@
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/irefenx-3404939;sa=summary
Telegram Username: @irefenx
Participated Campaigns: video
Bitcoin Wallet Address: bc1qnle6nk8tms5cntw5m6jtkn4dg9ka2gytcmyamr
Judgement: Red trust for impersonation.
June 03, 2022, 09:57:05 AM
2 Accounts Connected
Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue)
1.Hridoy44330
2.Dada21
Proof:
https://ninjastic.space/addresses?address=0xEb95c6dEEE42Bb098bbb1b228a2aEEB1a7352258
Related Addresses:
Miscellaneous:
cheating bounty programs.
👉 Seasonal Tokens Campaign 2.0 | Budget: $5k ~ BTC | 5 weeks. ESCROWED.
manager @CryptopreneurBrainboss
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10_iy0moCEP3exVhfpJijBNEKPM5TG2GknM0VdAkMero/edit#gid=695052286
Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue)
1.Hridoy44330
2.Dada21
Proof:
BTC Wallet bc1qza72hrexchnc6ah8slxds7yty2wf4ap0gu8fd8
[ archive ]Bitcoin address: bc1qza72hrexchnc6ah8slxds7yty2wf4ap0gu8fd8
[ archive ]Smart Chain (BSC) Wallet: 0x6938C6bc5fcA6E3bA44f5De11d4003f70f1a3126
[ archive ]BSC Wallet Address: 0x6938C6bc5fcA6E3bA44f5De11d4003f70f1a3126
[ archive ]https://ninjastic.space/addresses?address=0xEb95c6dEEE42Bb098bbb1b228a2aEEB1a7352258
Related Addresses:
Code:
Bitcoin address: bc1qza72hrexchnc6ah8slxds7yty2wf4ap0gu8fd8
BSC Wallet Address: 0x6938C6bc5fcA6E3bA44f5De11d4003f70f1a3126
BSC Wallet Address: 0x6938C6bc5fcA6E3bA44f5De11d4003f70f1a3126
Miscellaneous:
cheating bounty programs.
👉 Seasonal Tokens Campaign 2.0 | Budget: $5k ~ BTC | 5 weeks. ESCROWED.
manager @CryptopreneurBrainboss
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10_iy0moCEP3exVhfpJijBNEKPM5TG2GknM0VdAkMero/edit#gid=695052286
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1981
Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse
May 31, 2022, 11:14:33 AM
I want to know that how a Newbie like [Thenoss] know how to catch scammer! He/She also know where post will be created. Isn’t it strange? It’s common sense that Thenoss had alt account. That's why He/She know how to catch scammer and where this should be posted.
There's nothing wrong to have alternative account here as long as you are not cheating or abusing the forum. If you feel you should create an alt account to talk about any specific which may put your original account in danger, you are free to create one. May 31, 2022, 03:27:37 AM
Two account By one person
1. Kontor5
2. kitto# (red-tagged)
reference to trust feedback of kitto#
Proof✅:
Join & PROOF OF AUTHENTICATION## [/b][/color]
Bitcointalk Username: kitto#
bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/kitto-3328489
Twitter url:
https://twitter.com/p2cutlion?s=09
Twitter audit : https://www.twitteraudit.com/p2cutlion
Facebook URL: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100009009171834
Telegram Url: https://t.me/kolmilota
Telegram Username : @kolmilota
Notice how the profile link on user (kontor5) proof of authentication posts always lead to (kitto#) profile page.
1. Kontor5
2. kitto# (red-tagged)
reference to trust feedback of kitto#
Proof✅:
Join & PROOF OF AUTHENTICATION## [/b][/color]
Bitcointalk Username: Kontor5
bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/kitto-3328489
Twitter url:
https://twitter.com/p2cutlion?s=09
Twitter audit : https://www.twitteraudit.com/p2cutlion
Facebook URL: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100009009171834
Telegram Url: https://t.me/kolmilota
Telegram Username : @kolmilota
Bitcointalk Username: Kontor5
bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/kitto-3328489
Twitter url:
https://twitter.com/p2cutlion?s=09
Twitter audit : https://www.twitteraudit.com/p2cutlion
Facebook URL: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100009009171834
Telegram Url: https://t.me/kolmilota
Telegram Username : @kolmilota
Join & PROOF OF AUTHENTICATION## [/b][/color]
Bitcointalk Username: kitto#
bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/kitto-3328489
Twitter url:
https://twitter.com/p2cutlion?s=09
Twitter audit : https://www.twitteraudit.com/p2cutlion
Facebook URL: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100009009171834
Telegram Url: https://t.me/kolmilota
Telegram Username : @kolmilota
Notice how the profile link on user (kontor5) proof of authentication posts always lead to (kitto#) profile page.
Code:
bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/kitto-3328489
Twitter url: https://twitter.com/p2cutlion?s=09
Twitter audit : https://www.twitteraudit.com/p2cutlion
Facebook URL: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100009009171834
Telegram Url: https://t.me/kolmilota
Telegram Username : @kolmilota
Twitter url: https://twitter.com/p2cutlion?s=09
Twitter audit : https://www.twitteraudit.com/p2cutlion
Facebook URL: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100009009171834
Telegram Url: https://t.me/kolmilota
Telegram Username : @kolmilota
May 25, 2022, 08:35:22 AM
You need to start by fully checking all accounts to the end.
Your two accounts presented could be in different branches, by ban.
The account shadik007 has already been banned.
And the second account also violates the ban rule.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.60220820
Please pay attention.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I've wrote this before in the another thread, it's odd @Thenoss edited all of his bounty reports, that's why I open a discussion about this issues.
Can you comment on this?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.60221849
May 22, 2022, 06:23:07 AM
I want to know that how a Newbie like [Thenoss] know how to catch scammer! He/She also know where post will be created. Isn’t it strange? It’s common sense that Thenoss had alt account. That's why He/She know how to catch scammer and where this should be posted.
Even if what you say is true, having multiple accounts is not against the forum rules. Cheating in bounty campaigns with alt accounts, on the other hand, is not against forum rules either but is against campaign rules and is considered cheating of other bounty participants. Some bounties have different rules, but almost all prohibit having more than one account participating in the same campaign at the same time.
Therefore, if you are found participating in a bounty campaign with your alt account, you will get a negative tag not because you have an alt account, but because you cheated or attempted to cheat.
May 22, 2022, 01:47:44 AM
I want to know that how a Newbie like [Thenoss] know how to catch scammer! He/She also know where post will be created.
It's not actually about the rank. You can just simply browse this thread and see how high-ranking accounts catch bounty cheaters and alt-accounts. Then, it is just simply a matter of copying those required evidence/proofs and creating your own report.Also, utilizing this site will give someone an ample amount of evidence and information to post on a report: https://ninjastic.space/
This forum also has a search function (if you haven't noticed
) Isn’t it strange?
No, not really. It’s common sense that Thenoss had alt account. That's why He/She know how to catch scammer and where this should be posted.
Knowing where to find proof and the evidence doesn't prove that someone has an alt-account. Also, having an alt-account isn't really prohibited. Its what you do with those alt-accounts that is frowned upon on this forum (e.g. bounty cheating)
May 21, 2022, 12:20:45 PM
I want to know that how a Newbie like [Thenoss] know how to catch scammer! He/She also know where post will be created. Isn’t it strange? It’s common sense that Thenoss had alt account. That's why He/She know how to catch scammer and where this should be posted.
May 19, 2022, 02:30:59 AM
These account By One person
It's not 100% valid those accounts got controlled by one person, I've wrote this before in the another thread, it's odd @Thenoss edited all of his bounty reports, that's why I open a discussion about this issues.I take back my words, it seems @Karish2return didn't accidentally copied @Thenoss applications since @Thenoss using that's address too in many bounties. The interesting thing is why @Thenoss edited his applications and hide his address? Does this mean he scared if someone find him using 0xA07ef5d740D5000C3bc5bba7751f27F9AAefDA47 address since it's linked with @Karish2return (@Karish2return account already red tagged, the other account deserve a red tag too since he's the one who control those accounts).
Original application
If anyone want to see other applications by @Thenoss, you can check in this link https://ninjastic.space/address/0xA07ef5d740D5000C3bc5bba7751f27F9AAefDA47
Waiting for other users to react on this issues.
Forum Username: Karish2return
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/karish2return-840344
Telegram Username: @sirf2b
Participated Campaigns: Video
BEP-20 Wallet Address: 0xA07ef5d740D5000C3bc5bba7751f27F9AAefDA47
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/karish2return-840344
Telegram Username: @sirf2b
Participated Campaigns: Video
BEP-20 Wallet Address: 0xA07ef5d740D5000C3bc5bba7751f27F9AAefDA47
Original application
Proof of authentication
Forum name: Thenoss
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/thenoss-3470702
Campaign: Twitter, TG
Forum name: Thenoss
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/thenoss-3470702
Campaign: Twitter, TG
If anyone want to see other applications by @Thenoss, you can check in this link https://ninjastic.space/address/0xA07ef5d740D5000C3bc5bba7751f27F9AAefDA47
Waiting for other users to react on this issues.
many proof in here so check all details
May 19, 2022, 02:12:56 AM
These account By One person
It's not 100% valid those accounts got controlled by one person, I've wrote this before in the another thread, it's odd @Thenoss edited all of his bounty reports, that's why I open a discussion about this issues.I take back my words, it seems @Karish2return didn't accidentally copied @Thenoss applications since @Thenoss using that's address too in many bounties. The interesting thing is why @Thenoss edited his applications and hide his address? Does this mean he scared if someone find him using 0xA07ef5d740D5000C3bc5bba7751f27F9AAefDA47 address since it's linked with @Karish2return (@Karish2return account already red tagged, the other account deserve a red tag too since he's the one who control those accounts).
Original application
If anyone want to see other applications by @Thenoss, you can check in this link https://ninjastic.space/address/0xA07ef5d740D5000C3bc5bba7751f27F9AAefDA47
Waiting for other users to react on this issues.
Forum Username: Karish2return
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/karish2return-840344
Telegram Username: @sirf2b
Participated Campaigns: Video
BEP-20 Wallet Address: 0xA07ef5d740D5000C3bc5bba7751f27F9AAefDA47
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/karish2return-840344
Telegram Username: @sirf2b
Participated Campaigns: Video
BEP-20 Wallet Address: 0xA07ef5d740D5000C3bc5bba7751f27F9AAefDA47
Original application
Proof of authentication
Forum name: Thenoss
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/thenoss-3470702
Campaign: Twitter, TG
Forum name: Thenoss
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/thenoss-3470702
Campaign: Twitter, TG
If anyone want to see other applications by @Thenoss, you can check in this link https://ninjastic.space/address/0xA07ef5d740D5000C3bc5bba7751f27F9AAefDA47
Waiting for other users to react on this issues.
May 19, 2022, 01:51:11 AM
These account By One person
1. Thenoss
2. Karish2return
3. Pasa32
see this link already repost DT member see this link ,, https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.58022313
https://prnt.sc/aDqBnA51GflS
see this link https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.60142082
he send him merit see the scrnsrt https://prnt.sc/Fqeooc95KqNj
address connected
https://prnt.sc/XKtiaLSAHaME
THENOSS ALL DETAILS PUBLISHED:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.58022313
Address connected: 0x066a9226b7b110db56e497a960ac4b313bca797e
Transaction Hash: https://bscscan.com/tx/0x5bcccc80f8347387eeb51ae90d096429ea6359c2dbff0b0f4de97cc1285b168a
please see this link : https://ninjastic.space/address/0xA07ef5d740D5000C3bc5bba7751f27F9AAefDA47
address connected please see this scrnsrt https://prnt.sc/NJJiNdbphid8
1. Thenoss
2. Karish2return
3. Pasa32
see this link already repost DT member see this link ,, https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.58022313
https://prnt.sc/aDqBnA51GflS
see this link https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.60142082
he send him merit see the scrnsrt https://prnt.sc/Fqeooc95KqNj
address connected
https://prnt.sc/XKtiaLSAHaME
THENOSS ALL DETAILS PUBLISHED:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.58022313
Address connected: 0x066a9226b7b110db56e497a960ac4b313bca797e
Transaction Hash: https://bscscan.com/tx/0x5bcccc80f8347387eeb51ae90d096429ea6359c2dbff0b0f4de97cc1285b168a
please see this link : https://ninjastic.space/address/0xA07ef5d740D5000C3bc5bba7751f27F9AAefDA47
address connected please see this scrnsrt https://prnt.sc/NJJiNdbphid8
legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 4133
eXch.cx - Automatic crypto Swap Exchange.
May 11, 2022, 01:05:18 AM
While some evidence are quite convincing, others aren't and this users are getting a second chance or not been tagged/disqualified from campaign. Some have decided to scarified one account to keep the other in the campaign since we can't have two accounts of so much connections (which to us are alts in the campaign). From thenos findings, there are so many accounts that were already under our investigation due to several exact behaviors, like registering timeframe and report timeframe etc.
If you feel you're been wrongly accused drop your appeal, reach me on telegram through the bounty group (username on timeline) and your case will be looked into. For those rushing to delete accused videos, that does you no good as it doesn't help the situation you're in.
Ps: If you weren't tagged no need appealing as it's obvious there was no enough evidence to consider you an alt by Me. Also avoid quoting all reports, only quote your own case. (Those quoting all reports are getting their post deleted).
If you feel you're been wrongly accused drop your appeal, reach me on telegram through the bounty group (username on timeline) and your case will be looked into. For those rushing to delete accused videos, that does you no good as it doesn't help the situation you're in.
Ps: If you weren't tagged no need appealing as it's obvious there was no enough evidence to consider you an alt by Me. Also avoid quoting all reports, only quote your own case. (Those quoting all reports are getting their post deleted).
May 10, 2022, 03:38:59 AM
Two accounts connected
1. Louis.orhewere
2. Konvict20
These two accounts are owned by one person. After receiving a couple of negative trust rating on his account (louis.orhewere), he came with another account (konvict20) and sign up on the same bounties as the first account.
Proof 1 ✅
Facebook campaign
Facebook profile link: https://facebook.com/louiskonvict?ref_component=mfreebasic_home_header&ref_page=%2Fwap%2Fhome.php&refid=8
Facebook campaign
Facebook profile link: https://facebook.com/louiskonvict?ref_component=mfreebasic_home_header&ref_page=%2Fwap%2Fhome.php&refid=8
Louis.orhewer has the same Facebook account as konvict20.
Bounty campaign where he signed up with both accounts (ETHAX)
Category (twitter)
Louis.orhewere - 894 (REJECTED)
Konvict20 -1136 (ACCEPTED)
Proof 2 ✅
Konvict20 (0x642aB36324e74d6D95f4419B0A9b1f19336868F3) received some BNB from louis.orhewere (0xF285505B09d789EcB644888EA62A51F34Eae71f6)
Tx hash
#Proof Of Authentication
Bitcointalk username: Louis.orhewere
Bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/louisorhewere-2628849;sa=summary
Telegram username: @louwizfino
Participating Campaigns: Twitter, Facebook
BSC address: 0xF285505B09d789EcB644888EA62A51F34Eae71f6
Proof 3✅
Louis.orhewere has the same telegram username as konvict20.
Telegram username: @louwizfino
Forum Username:Konvict20
Bitcointalk username: Louis.orhewere
Telegram username: @louwizfino
1. Louis.orhewere
2. Konvict20
These two accounts are owned by one person. After receiving a couple of negative trust rating on his account (louis.orhewere), he came with another account (konvict20) and sign up on the same bounties as the first account.
Proof 1 ✅
Facebook campaign
Facebook profile link: https://facebook.com/louiskonvict?ref_component=mfreebasic_home_header&ref_page=%2Fwap%2Fhome.php&refid=8
Facebook campaign
Facebook profile link: https://facebook.com/louiskonvict?ref_component=mfreebasic_home_header&ref_page=%2Fwap%2Fhome.php&refid=8
Bounty campaign where he signed up with both accounts (ETHAX)
Category (twitter)
Louis.orhewere - 894 (REJECTED)
Konvict20 -1136 (ACCEPTED)
Proof 2 ✅
Konvict20 (0x642aB36324e74d6D95f4419B0A9b1f19336868F3) received some BNB from louis.orhewere (0xF285505B09d789EcB644888EA62A51F34Eae71f6)
Tx hash
#Proof Of Authentication
Bitcointalk username: Louis.orhewere
Bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/louisorhewere-2628849;sa=summary
Telegram username: @louwizfino
Participating Campaigns: Twitter, Facebook
BSC address: 0xF285505B09d789EcB644888EA62A51F34Eae71f6
#Proof Of Registration
Telegram username: @louwizfino
Forum Username:Konvict20
Forum Profile Link:https:https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/konvict20-3467537;sa=summary
Participated Campaigns: Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and telegram
Bsc Wallet Address:0x642aB36324e74d6D95f4419B0A9b1f19336868F3
Telegram username: @louwizfino
Forum Username:Konvict20
Forum Profile Link:https:https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/konvict20-3467537;sa=summary
Participated Campaigns: Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and telegram
Bsc Wallet Address:0x642aB36324e74d6D95f4419B0A9b1f19336868F3
Proof 3✅
Louis.orhewere has the same telegram username as konvict20.
Telegram username: @louwizfino
Forum Username:Konvict20
Bitcointalk username: Louis.orhewere
Telegram username: @louwizfino
May 09, 2022, 07:51:42 AM
Please explain to me what bounty rules have been violated by these two accounts. It may even be one family, but in all the videos we see two different people, two browsers, and even that doesn't matter. I checked two accounts and I don't see any matches. Sending tokens to one buffer wallet cannot be direct evidence of a violation of the company's rules without additional evidence.
What's wrong with a son helping his father?
So the result: Are you really sure that two accounts from the same family that do not have any intersections, except for the discount of tokens in one wallet, are worthy of a negative review? Where is the rule that only one person from a family has a bounty rule?
Plz explain what is the criteria for one person with multiple accounts.What's wrong with a son helping his father?
So the result: Are you really sure that two accounts from the same family that do not have any intersections, except for the discount of tokens in one wallet, are worthy of a negative review? Where is the rule that only one person from a family has a bounty rule?
Is using same hashtag
Is using same description
Is using same room
I have different account, different gesture, make video with only facecam, using hashtag required by BM and so do my son. I have my account and my son has his own account. How one person two accounts.
You have no such proof nor i m engaged in multiple accounts. Two persons two accounts that's all.
Brother these are not proof that one person with two accounts. Look it seriously please.
[/quote]
Both account article are same just alternate text part.
You catched Don't give any excuses. Both account by you✅
Darth protocol article (provide just some)
https://ibb.co/TYfT1pR
https://ibb.co/mSfpDwp
https://ibb.co/9pPCHn1
https://ibb.co/02Nm187
https://ibb.co/9HVKvYx
https://ibb.co/TcVQvRH
[/quote] I m not giving excuses to you. I have only asked for the criteria of one person with Two accounts. Could you plz provide?
Your explanation do not merit for negative trust.
[/quote] Reply why are u not providing the rules and criteria? Because u dont know.
You only know that using same hashtag, same discription and same room are the criteria to identify one person usibg two accounts. How sad.
May 09, 2022, 06:50:53 AM
Sir, I have nothing to do with these accounts and the voice is not the same. On what basis are you saying that this is one person's account? You can check out more of my videos, please. You can check the arrow. And besides, I can't change the computer system, so thousands of computers use the same window. You can check that the sound is not the same. Secondly, you can check the work of my account and their account. I strongly condemn such a move and I will ask my esteemed elders to check once and for all on what basis they have added negatively to my account. And that's my request, check and remove the negative from my account. And if anyone has any proof, I will present proof in my own defense. And if anyone needs proof, let me know.
May 09, 2022, 05:11:15 AM
Please explain to me what bounty rules have been violated by these two accounts. It may even be one family, but in all the videos we see two different people, two browsers, and even that doesn't matter. I checked two accounts and I don't see any matches. Sending tokens to one buffer wallet cannot be direct evidence of a violation of the company's rules without additional evidence.
What's wrong with a son helping his father?
So the result: Are you really sure that two accounts from the same family that do not have any intersections, except for the discount of tokens in one wallet, are worthy of a negative review? Where is the rule that only one person from a family has a bounty rule?
What's wrong with a son helping his father?
So the result: Are you really sure that two accounts from the same family that do not have any intersections, except for the discount of tokens in one wallet, are worthy of a negative review? Where is the rule that only one person from a family has a bounty rule?
Check Their description
They Using same hashtags and Title of video same etc [ 2 accounts by one person✅]
https://ibb.co/Byyc23R
https://ibb.co/njFWZT4
https://ibb.co/dfP623Z
https://ibb.co/X7tF1VV
Is using same hashtag
Is using same description
Is using same room
I have different account, different gesture, make video with only facecam, using hashtag required by BM and so do my son. I have my account and my son has his own account. How one person two accounts.
You have no such proof nor i m engaged in multiple accounts. Two persons two accounts that's all.
Brother these are not proof that one person with two accounts. Look it seriously please.
Both account article are same just alternate text part.
You catched Don't give any excuses. Both account by you✅
Darth protocol article (provide just some)
https://ibb.co/TYfT1pR
https://ibb.co/mSfpDwp
https://ibb.co/9pPCHn1
https://ibb.co/02Nm187
https://ibb.co/9HVKvYx
https://ibb.co/TcVQvRH
Your explanation do not merit for negative trust.
May 09, 2022, 04:48:38 AM
Please explain to me what bounty rules have been violated by these two accounts. It may even be one family, but in all the videos we see two different people, two browsers, and even that doesn't matter. I checked two accounts and I don't see any matches. Sending tokens to one buffer wallet cannot be direct evidence of a violation of the company's rules without additional evidence.
What's wrong with a son helping his father?
So the result: Are you really sure that two accounts from the same family that do not have any intersections, except for the discount of tokens in one wallet, are worthy of a negative review? Where is the rule that only one person from a family has a bounty rule?
What's wrong with a son helping his father?
So the result: Are you really sure that two accounts from the same family that do not have any intersections, except for the discount of tokens in one wallet, are worthy of a negative review? Where is the rule that only one person from a family has a bounty rule?
Check Their description
They Using same hashtags and Title of video same etc [ 2 accounts by one person✅]
https://ibb.co/Byyc23R
https://ibb.co/njFWZT4
https://ibb.co/dfP623Z
https://ibb.co/X7tF1VV
Is using same hashtag
Is using same description
Is using same room
I have different account, different gesture, make video with only facecam, using hashtag required by BM and so do my son. I have my account and my son has his own account. How one person two accounts.
You have no such proof nor i m engaged in multiple accounts. Two persons two accounts that's all.
Brother these are not proof that one person with two accounts. Look it seriously please.
May 09, 2022, 04:21:16 AM
Just connected wallet will get red trust in your opinion? You both used secondary wallet to sent your busd then you deposit your busd in exchange. same deposit address✅ (and It's not a first time)
You both are Pakistani guy.Your local language same. Both are facecam in same room.both joined bounty serialy(107,109). How you greedy making video by your kid.
For your information, no interconnected transfers have been proved by you.
Third, what is your opinion about Pakistani guys. Is there any restrictions on these people who are promoting projects to their own people in native language.
Sorry to say but greedy are you who is looking for mere merit by insulting people and disgrace their work.
May 09, 2022, 04:10:46 AM
[/quote]
Please explain to me what bounty rules have been violated by these two accounts. It may even be one family, but in all the videos we see two different people, two browsers, and even that doesn't matter. I checked two accounts and I don't see any matches. Sending tokens to one buffer wallet cannot be direct evidence of a violation of the company's rules without additional evidence.
What's wrong with a son helping his father?
So the result: Are you really sure that two accounts from the same family that do not have any intersections, except for the discount of tokens in one wallet, are worthy of a negative review? Where is the rule that only one person from a family has a bounty rule?
[/quote] Yes. I am saying these word. But your words are very clear
Jump to: