Topic: {Reference} Detailed reasons why you recieve a red feedback from me [campaigns]. - page 3. (Read 2487 times)

Please explain to me what bounty rules have been violated by these two accounts. It may even be one family, but in all the videos we see two different people, two browsers, and even that doesn't matter. I checked two accounts and I don't see any matches. Sending tokens to one buffer wallet cannot be direct evidence of a violation of the company's rules without additional evidence.

What's wrong with a son helping his father?

So the result: Are you really sure that two accounts from the same family that do not have any intersections, except for the discount of tokens in one wallet, are worthy of a negative review? Where is the rule that only one person from a family has a bounty rule?

I see you launch campaigns as well, how do you tackle that?

For us, we tagged caught individual on spreedsheet depending on their crime and they lose eligibility for campaign. e.g
Cheater (Submit Others works)
Cheater (Sent Previous works report) etc.

A little off topic.
How do you fight with copy/paste tweet?
There are a lot of cheaters who copy from others and tweet as their own and submit for stake. I was able to find a lot but I think there are more cheaters which I can't find.

Another merit hunt, I wouldn't be surprised if the new "detective" opened an alternate account.

@Thenoss, why are you overwriting alternative accounts already found earlier? I searched the mail "Email: [email protected]".
The search shows that your supposedly "found" accounts were already present on the forum. They were discovered earlier by the same "unfortunate detective" as you, who also regularly raised his "investigations"


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.59349390


This is  warning, if you decide to look for alternative accounts, do not duplicate other people's posts. Check it out completely.

I will check all your searches. I'm pretty sure you're an alternate account that was previously banned from posting in a certain thread for your wrong investigations.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/teletalkorg-3446063

edit

Didn't have to search long. Again, copying previously found accounts.

Case 003: Signature Cheater.
Details: nhaila is guilty of swapping between two signature campaigns and recieving reward weekly with the same posts. The two projects involved are;
[BOUNTY] Moobet.io Signature Campaign | 2 Weeks | _Updated Rates _ [w/ESCROW] managed by julerz12
Seasonal Tokens Bounty Campaign | Budget: $50k ~ Bitcoin | 8 weeks. Escrowed. managed by CryptopreneurBrainboss.

Archives:
Moonbet
Archive: https://archive.is/h9ybb


Seasonal Tokens:
Archive: https://archive.is/TO7yf


After an anonymous tip last week, observation were placed on the account after discovering this act of his. Stakes weren't denied last week just to avoid raising suspicions. After recieving stakes for this week promotion, the user switched signature code immediately as to be eligible for weekly stake of Moobet (which the manager is also aware of).

Judgement: Red feedback and removal of all previous stakes in accordance to signature rule 5.

Note: If you're appealing, avoid quoting all reports or your reply will be deleted, only quote your own case (edit out others cases) to keep the thread clean.

Just as the title says, if you're participating in my bounty or signature campaign and noticed you receive a red feedback from me then you can find the reason behind that feedback on this thread with full details.

This thread is strictly for detailed reference of my feedbacks for those in a campaign under my management, you can appeal if you feel I made a mistake.

If the thread is locked and you want to appeal, you can write me and it'll be opened for that purpose only and after conclusion, topic will be locked so it can only serve its purpose of creation. Avoid quote spamming or your reply will be deleted.

Ps: Thread is self moderated to moderate spams, this privilege won't be misused or abused.

Case 001: Meme Plagiarism.
Details: Mohammed2 with telegram username @Mohammedshisir is claiming a meme belonging to this user Martin jack with telegram name @selfishk as his. As showed on this bounty report, he submitted this users memes as his creation and was willing to recieve reward for it.

Image proofs



First Image is proof that @selfishk posted the meme earlier on 12th august, 2021 before @Mohammedshisir posted his and submitted for reward.

Archives:
Mohammed2 bounty report: https://archive.is/wip/FerO4
Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-G9TKkuKwDijMGlMXIAIaGKmwOyCdFP3xvTXSCOncpQ

Judgement: Red feedback for Meme plagiarism.

Case 002: Meme Plagiarism.
This user @Samzvai is guilty of stealing memes and posting them as his for reward.

Image proofs



Archives:
@Samzvai  bounty report: https://archive.is/wip/KdFDi
Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-G9TKkuKwDijMGlMXIAIaGKmwOyCdFP3xvTXSCOncpQ

Judgement: Red feedback for Meme plagiarism.