Suppose someone wanted to release that data.
Why would they send it to you instead of just posting it online anonymously?
Secondly, why don't you post it online anonymously? Nobody would be able to prove it was you, or the original sender or anyone else.
Topic: Release of GLBSE's Documents - page 4. (Read 4284 times)
Just UP the files somewhere. There's no need for drama or suspense.
Otherwise, you made up those files.
Otherwise, you made up those files.
Notably, when contacted privately, OP was not interested in posting hashes for the data, leaving no way for the data to be verified by other entities as fiction, or non-fiction (without a line-by-line, sentence-by-sentence comparison).
Smells like fiction + drama.
How do you differ fictional data from factual data only with 'hashes'?
You heard of wikileaks, right?
Yes, I know what is Wikileaks.
Just UP the files somewhere. There's no need for drama or suspense.
Otherwise, you made up those files.
Otherwise, you made up those files.
Notably, when contacted privately, OP was not interested in posting hashes for the data, leaving no way for the data to be verified by other entities as fiction, or non-fiction (without a line-by-line, sentence-by-sentence comparison).
Smells like fiction + drama.
You heard of wikileaks, right?
this is BS, these "sensitive documents" can't be trusted, so who gives a f*** what they say...
Sure, there is possibility that documents are fake or has been altered. People should be aware of this.
However same argument was used by Giga and others regarding the shareholder list from Nefario. They simply said it could not be trusted. Giga then forced all shareholders to identify themselves. But that's another story...
However same argument was used by Giga and others regarding the shareholder list from Nefario. They simply said it could not be trusted. Giga then forced all shareholders to identify themselves. But that's another story...
The documents could be fake.
I am very aware of this.
Perhaps parts of the documents were doctored and then sent to me.
Do you have any of the files listed?
Just UP the files somewhere. There's no need for drama or suspense.
Otherwise, you made up those files.
Otherwise, you made up those files.
I did not 'made up those files'.
The documents contains references to OpenPGP certificates of the GLBSE shareholders. That is impossible to forge.
The documents could be fake.
Could be, but I don't think that the partners in GLBSE are a cohesive enough group that every single one of them would lie about the authenticity of the documents.
The documents could be fake.
You could post them and then people who are interested could look and those who aren't could ignore them, right?
Completely right!
However I am very interested to know what the forum users thoughts before I release the documents.
By the way, why do you think I received this documents from an anonymous user without any instruction at all?
I presume they expected that you'd "publish and be damned".
Good answer.
That was my first thought when I decide to understand the expectation of the anonymous sender.
Just UP the files somewhere. There's no need for drama or suspense.
Otherwise, you made up those files.
Otherwise, you made up those files.
I'm guessin' the sender's a horny ~45 y/o Bitcoiner who wears pajamas, if you know what I mean, Gavar bean.
You could post them and then people who are interested could look and those who aren't could ignore them, right?
By the way, why do you think I received this documents from an anonymous user without any instruction at all?
I presume they expected that you'd "publish and be damned".
When are you going to make a decision - when a certain date arrives or when a certain number of people vote "yes".
Good question!
I will set a threshold to determine the final decision.
By the way, why do you think I received this documents from an anonymous user without any instruction at all?
When are you going to make a decision - when a certain date arrives or when a certain number of people vote "yes".
This might be a silly question, but considering that Nefario already lost all the trust and share issuers are slowly getting over all the shit caused by the infamous "cleanest shutdown ever", what's the point of this stupid voting thread, and why don't you just release what you have so we can all learn from mistakes of GLBSE?
The point is to let the users of this forum decide if they are really interested to look into the documents. Keep in mind that GLBSE had 13 shareholders. Most of this shareholders are active users in this forum. So they are also entitled to participate in this decision.
edit:
I really hate people who are publicly saying things like "I got these interesting documents that could get him and him into the trouble" but not willing to release them. I meet people like this every day, and I am sick of them.
I really hate people who are publicly saying things like "I got these interesting documents that could get him and him into the trouble" but not willing to release them. I meet people like this every day, and I am sick of them.
I understand your hate, but I am not one of these 'people' since I am willing to release the documents. However, I want to know if the users if this forum are also willing to look into the documents.
Jump to: