He ~ my judgment for including him on the list of gambling board spammers
Can't believe this guy is such an
awesome shitposter that he was proposed to be banned from an entire board! He reminds me of franky1, which was
banned from Development and Technical Discussion.
And, based on Igebotz's explanation,
why is this? I bet the majority of those who applied to those campaigns had no knowledge of the game, but because the rules require a minimum of 10 posts on the gambling board, most of these users with no knowledge of the game just spam the hell out of the board
MinoRaiola does not even know rules of football? Looooooooooooooooool! Can't believe this!
Nice catch, it's triple plagiarism or let's say multiple plagiarism from what is known right now. Maybe there's even more…
Triple plagiarism?! Damn, this guy is very efficient at what he does!
He ~ my judgment for including him on the list of gambling board spammers
Yeah, it's usual for him to do this when someone exposed him.
I'm on his distrust list as well, similar like many high-ranked DT members.
I am part of this gang as well
So Instead of wasting time reporting, I simply made the list in the hopes that the managers would see it and decide whether they agreed with me or not.
Definitely, best case your list would get accepted similar to
actmyname's spammers blacklist, where spammers are rejected frequently when applying for signature campaigns.
I've seen campaign managers adding actmyname's list in their rules,
like here by icopress. It's really beneficial for the forum to have campaign managers considering such feedbcks.
I would definitely support campaign managers adding your list as a rule, too.
I believe it would be also useful if campaign managers would visit this thread from time to time. In case actmyname or Igebotz can't update their lists too often, managers can get their
material directly from this thread.
I've been a little bit more active in Gambling Discussion lately [...]
Unfortunately, there are far too many spammers, who just comment there to get their required weekly gambling posts quota and don't care about sport or gambling...
I am also baffled by what shitposters do inside Gambling or Gambling Discussion boards. For example, the guy trying to
miximize profits through crypto and which never showed up inside his own thread until both you and me signaled that and only after that he showed up, quoting your entire post (which was huge) and saying
saying another nonsense.
The guy saying that
referral bonuses are waste of time triggered a 396 posts discussion where everybody says nothing. Here, the "discussion" is still ongoing.
Here, OP asks
a very dumb question, yet the topic is still live, having already 228 posts. And so on and so forth...
Yes, I'm a bit surprised why temporary bans are "out" after all. A temporary signature ban is rather soft; people can still write posts as usual. It isn't affecting normal discussions at all. I really don't know why this procedure has been abandoned as it's a great way to see if affected accounts should be given a second chance, if they'll contribute to the forum without paid signature or if they are really just here to spam to earn a few sats.
What we can do is to
tag these accounts accordingly. For example, let's not forget that MinoRaiola, while currently
promoting pornography even better than
the old perv Timelord2067, also cheats on his own contest,
where he changes the rules while the contest is live. This is totally unprofessional.