I think that the moderators will have a hard time deciding on a perma ban in case of suspicion that it is a post that was written with the help of AI. of course, except in cases where the user actually admits (unknowingly) that his post was actually written by AI.
If mods gonna wait for someone to slip and unknowingly admits to using the bot like in the case from yesterday, then things will soon get out of hands we might gonna get swarmed by these farmers. While it may be hard in some cases to notice chatbot users (e.g. older member that is native English speaker) in some cases its pretty obvious and imho admins shouldn't be so hesitant.
Just take for example that user lovesmayfamilis reported and difference in posts written on the same day, just 1 hour apart. I think that its pretty obvious what is going on here.
people should also consider that using their ERC20 compatible addresses on a new EVM-like chain, they always might have the risk for replay attacks, considering the private key is same on both chains, so if you have ethereum for example and you use same address on another new evm fork chain, you have the risk the recipient of a transaction in this chain, to also replay and steal your ETH on parent chain!
Bitcoin, the world’s first cryptocurrency, has been subject to numerous controversies and criticisms since its inception. One of the most common accusations levied against it is that it is a Ponzi scheme. While some people may believe this to be true, it is important to understand that Bitcoin is not a Ponzi scheme.
A Ponzi scheme is a fraudulent investment scheme that pays returns to earlier investors using the capital of newer investors, rather than from profits generated by legitimate business activities. The scheme relies on the continuous recruitment of new investors to keep the payouts coming. Eventually, the scheme collapses when new investors are no longer attracted, and the earlier investors lose their money.
Bitcoin, on the other hand, is a decentralized digital currency that operates on a peer-to-peer network. It does not rely on the recruitment of new investors to generate returns. Instead, the value of Bitcoin is determined by the supply and demand of the market. The price fluctuates based on a number of factors, including market sentiment, economic news, and geopolitical events.
While Bitcoin itself is not a Ponzi scheme, bad actors have used it to perpetrate Ponzi schemes and other forms of investment fraud. These scams often promise high returns in a short amount of time and require individuals to invest their Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies. The returns are paid out to earlier investors using the capital of newer investors, much like a traditional Ponzi scheme.
These scams are usually disguised as legitimate investment opportunities, such as mining operations, trading bots, or cryptocurrency exchanges. They often rely on slick marketing materials and persuasive sales tactics to lure in unsuspecting victims.
It is important for individuals to exercise caution and do their due diligence before investing in any scheme, whether it involves Bitcoin or not. This includes researching the company, its founders, and its business model. It is also important to understand that high returns with little risk are usually too good to be true.
In conclusion, while Bitcoin is not a Ponzi scheme, it has been used as a tool by bad actors to perpetrate investment fraud. It is important for individuals to be aware of the risks involved in investing in any scheme and to exercise caution when considering any investment opportunity. By doing so, they can protect themselves from falling victim to Ponzi schemes and other forms of investment fraud.
For now, I have chosen a different approach in the sense that if I suspect such a post, I warn others not to participate in such discussions. I'm not sure how good or bad that approach is, but something must be done against those AI bots.
Since a lot of members see new topic only as a place to dump their posts without regard of quality, somehow I doubt that many will listen to you and avoid engaging in topics started by chatbots. For now, I am leaving neutral tag to all those that I think are using chatbots. I doubt that will help but as you said, something has to be done.
It's amazing he's even too lazy to read what the "AI" produces. 
