Reporter Statistics - page 6. | Bitcointalksearch.org

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: examplens on November 08, 2019, 09:38:36 AM

I report post: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5199528 He has been deleted, but it is still marked as a bad report in my statistics.
Does that mean that maybe user deletes his post before moderator check report, or what?

Maybe you've reported the same post twice. Or your report was bad, but the entire topic was deleted so the post is gone anyway.

examplens

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 3098

My stats are You have reported 1746 posts with 100% accuracy (1726 good, 6 bad, 14 unhandled)
I guess that is solid score 6 bad on 1700+ reported but I am curious. I report post: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5199528 He has been deleted, but it is still marked as a bad report in my statistics.
Does that mean that maybe user deletes his post before moderator check report, or what?

actmyname

copper member

Activity: 2562

Merit: 2504

Spear the bees

Quote from: Welsh on October 23, 2019, 02:38:15 PM

This might be worth looking at as 4 seconds when reporting certain types of spam can be annoying for the reporter, and deter them from reporting. I know there's tools out there such as Suchmoon's where you can add reports to queues, but having it natively within the forum so there's not such a wait. I think anyone over 5000+ good reports should be only limited to a 1 second cool down. Then, that will likely prevent too many errors/requests, and still not interrupt with reporting.

Script is not optimized but this is an excerpt of my logs when using it:

Code:

Today at 05:21:58 PM Re: Bitcoin May Extinct thirdlight Good
Today at 05:20:22 PM Re: What did you know about Bitcoin before becoming a bitcoiner? thirdlight Good
Today at 05:20:17 PM Re: Earning Interest with Bitcoin? thirdlight Good
Today at 05:20:11 PM Re: No Capacity to Kill Bitcoin! thirdlight Good
Today at 05:20:05 PM Re: Why Cryptocurrency is better than fiat currency? thirdlight Good
Today at 05:20:00 PM Re: Loan to buy Bitcoin? thirdlight Good
Today at 05:19:55 PM Re: Would Quantum Computer Kill Bitcoin thirdlight Good
Today at 05:19:50 PM Re: What Makes Bitcoin Valuable? thirdlight Good
Today at 05:19:45 PM Re: What are we really investing in bitcoin? thirdlight Good
Today at 05:19:40 PM Re: Big drop in hashrate thirdlight Good
Today at 05:19:35 PM Re: Cryptocurrency in the next financial crisis thirdlight Good
Today at 05:19:30 PM Re: Bitcoin Legality effect thirdlight Good
Today at 05:19:25 PM Re: Bitcoin: Stress and Happiness thirdlight Good
Today at 05:19:20 PM Re: The One Thing That Could Stop Bitcoin thirdlight Good
Today at 05:19:15 PM Re: No other currency thirdlight Good
Today at 05:19:10 PM Re: DID I MAKE A MISTAKE INVESTING IN BITCOIN? thirdlight Good
Today at 05:19:05 PM Re: Stop Worrying about the Bitcoin Price thirdlight Good
Today at 05:19:00 PM Re: Stop Inflation With Crypto? How? thirdlight Good
Today at 05:18:55 PM Re: Alt coins better or stable during bitcoin lot of movement thirdlight Good
Today at 05:18:50 PM Re: Bitcoin future thirdlight Good

Ideally I would keep it on a queue with a dynamic index refreshing about once per half second and loop through the unsubmitted reports.

It is definitely annoying when I have to post something and need to either wait for the queue to finish submitting or for the window where I can sneak a post in before I submit a new report. Sometimes, I'll have blocks of several scores of minutes before I can finally actively do anything on the forum. Oh, and:

Code:

You have reported 39341 posts with 98% accuracy (36306 good, 921 bad, 2114 unhandled).

Welsh

staff

Activity: 3248

Merit: 4110

Quote from: LoyceV on October 23, 2019, 02:28:22 PM

I was whitelisted by hilariousandco a few weeks back, hoping that would reduce the delay of 4 seconds between reports: it doesn't!
So once you have enough activity to wait only 4 seconds between posts, there's nothing else that can increase your reporting speed.

This might be worth looking at as 4 seconds when reporting certain types of spam can be annoying for the reporter, and deter them from reporting. I know there's tools out there such as Suchmoon's where you can add reports to queues, but having it natively within the forum so there's not such a wait. I think anyone over 5000+ good reports should be only limited to a 1 second cool down. Then, that will likely prevent too many errors/requests, and still not interrupt with reporting.

Lafu

legendary

Activity: 2940

Merit: 3030

Because i see some activity here in this thread and i forgot to look for it at some stage here are my reports !
Little late but at least i got a few more in the mean time on it .
Nice to see some new faces in here as well.

Code:

You have reported 17672 posts with 100% accuracy (17576 good, 34 bad, 62 unhandled).

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

I was whitelisted by hilariousandco a few weeks back, hoping that would reduce the delay of 4 seconds between reports: it doesn't!
So once you have enough activity to wait only 4 seconds between posts, there's nothing else that can increase your reporting speed.

My stats:

Quote

You have reported 6797 posts with 99% accuracy (6447 good, 79 bad, 271 unhandled).

And on url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1903546]LoyceMobile[/url]:
519 posts, 100%, 495 good, 3 bad, 21 unhandled.

DiamondCardz

legendary

Activity: 1134

Merit: 1105

Probably reported about 50 posts in the last few days in my crusade to clean up my favorite forum section Wink

Only had 1 of those marked bad so far and to be fair my report was pretty flimsy on that one. My plan is to keep reporting and reporting and reporting until people finally get the message and post threads in their intended sections, but who knows if they ever will

DaveF

legendary

Activity: 3458

Merit: 6231

Crypto Swap Exchange

Dave patting himself on the back....I'm up to 400 good reports.
Yeah, I am still an amateur compared to some of you, but I try.
-Dave

Lafu

legendary

Activity: 2940

Merit: 3030

Here is my update on the reports Statistic !

Code:

Bitcoin Forum > Your reports

You have reported 17601 posts with 100% accuracy (17506 good, 34 bad, 61 unhandled).

DaveF

legendary

Activity: 3458

Merit: 6231

Crypto Swap Exchange

WooHoo finally got over 300.
Yeah I know I'm still a slacker compared to some of you, but I do report the ones I see.
Also, can now see the list of what has been done to the ones I reported.

-Dave

DaveF

legendary

Activity: 3458

Merit: 6231

Crypto Swap Exchange

Quote from: DaveF on August 03, 2019, 04:40:08 PM

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on August 03, 2019, 03:27:01 PM

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=reportlist;mine

You need to have 300 good reports before it gives you an individual breakdown of your reports, though.

Well that's kind of backwards. You get to guess for your first few hundred reported posts, then we tell you what we think is good and what we think is bad.
I would like to think that after 300 good reports I would have figured it out.

Ah, well off to report some more.

-Dave

WooHoo up to 200 good reports.
Yeah, it's not much compared to some of you but still I added a lot in the last 30 days.

Quote

You have reported 203 posts with 99% accuracy (200 good, 3 bad, 0 unhandled). Do not worry about your accuracy too much; one accurate report is worth many inaccurate reports.

-Dave

OcTradism

hero member

Activity: 1722

Merit: 801

Quote from: TryNinja on August 04, 2019, 12:00:02 PM

Quote from: OcTradism on August 04, 2019, 02:53:03 AM

If that image is not a product of photoshop, you should be awarded a Legendary Reporter Badge. You deserve it because you are one of most powerful fighters against spammers.

"Total time logged in: 13.7 billions years and 5 minutes."

I did not notice it :V

TryNinja

legendary

Activity: 2758

Merit: 6830

Quote from: OcTradism on August 04, 2019, 02:53:03 AM

If that image is not a product of photoshop, you should be awarded a Legendary Reporter Badge. You deserve it because you are one of most powerful fighters against spammers.

"Total time logged in: 13.7 billions years and 5 minutes."

OcTradism

hero member

Activity: 1722

Merit: 801

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on July 31, 2019, 04:57:05 PM

If that image is not a product of photoshop, you should be awarded a Legendary Reporter Badge. You deserve it because you are one of most powerful fighters against spammers.

tbct_mt2

hero member

Activity: 2254

Merit: 831

Quote from: malevolent on August 03, 2019, 07:25:22 PM

b. if every user could see which of their reports are bad/good/unhandled, it could create a bigger burden on mods, Global mods and admins with questions why their report was handled the way it was.

I guess it is one of reasons why theymos has not yet create reporter badges and requirements to get those badges. Even if badges do not bring any sort of benefits to reporters (that we all believe badges don't have), it still might result in spamming wave of reports, and more bad reports might be submitted. If any kind of reporter badges launched, I think requirements to get them should be kept in secret, like lucky number of activity to hit Legendary rank.
If someone usually make post reports, just keep doing this, and when a beautiful day comes with lucky number of total good reports, a reporter badge will be rewarded for that account.

Lafu

legendary

Activity: 2940

Merit: 3030

For sure if a user reports statistic have 10 good reports and 500 bad reports he should think about his reporting skillz maybe ,
but as malevolent says 1 good report is better than 10 bad reports . Cool

malevolent

legendary

Activity: 3472

Merit: 1721

Quote from: DaveF on August 03, 2019, 04:40:08 PM

Well that's kind of backwards. You get to guess for your first few hundred reported posts, then we tell you what we think is good and what we think is bad.
I would like to think that after 300 good reports I would have figured it out.

I think the reasoning is that:

a. it's not a problem if someone makes a bad report, as one correct report is worth many bad ones;
b. if every user could see which of their reports are bad/good/unhandled, it could create a bigger burden on mods, Global mods and admins with questions why their report was handled the way it was.

DaveF

legendary

Activity: 3458

Merit: 6231

Crypto Swap Exchange

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on August 03, 2019, 03:27:01 PM

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=reportlist;mine

You need to have 300 good reports before it gives you an individual breakdown of your reports, though.

Well that's kind of backwards. You get to guess for your first few hundred reported posts, then we tell you what we think is good and what we think is bad.
I would like to think that after 300 good reports I would have figured it out.

Ah, well off to report some more.

-Dave

o_e_l_e_o

legendary

Activity: 2268

Merit: 18503

Quote from: DaveF on August 03, 2019, 03:10:27 PM

If there is a link to see which is which please share.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=reportlist;mine

You need to have 300 good reports before it gives you an individual breakdown of your reports, though.

DaveF

legendary

Activity: 3458

Merit: 6231

Crypto Swap Exchange

Quote from: Welsh on July 31, 2019, 12:50:55 PM

I have 263 bad reports, and now that the new system out where bad reports are actually shown you'll be able to guess why, and hopefully improve upon that. Honestly, bad reports aren't that big of a deal.

Are you talking about the number of bad reports or is there a place that I can see which reports I made that were considered bad?

The number of bad reports is nice, but the issue is when I went to bed I had 8 unhandled reports. I woke up with 2 unhandled reports and another 2 bad ones added to my count. I have no idea which ones were good, which ones were bad and which ones were not looked at yet.

If there is a link to see which is which please share. If it's someplace obvious feel free to poke fun of me...

Thanks,
Dave

Topic: Reporter Statistics - page 6. (Read 24684 times)