Topic: Reporter Statistics - page 9. (Read 24818 times)
Been meaning to drop by and post an update of stats. I haven't been as active as I was for a while, and I've noticed an overall improvement on boards like Bitcoin Discussion. One thin gI've noticed is that not all moderators see issues the same way. So I try to remember when a report gets marked bad so I don't bother with those types on that board anymore. A feature that would be nice is the option to rescind a report within a few minuted if you realise a mistake.... which I just did. Sometimes having multiple windows open can cause me to report the wrong post on the wrong board, this optin would help me remove that bit of work from the queue.
...
By the way, I’m now finally in the 1000 successful reporters club
Nice job By the way, I’m now finally in the 1000 successful reporters club
The trick is, don't stop it now, and maybe you won't notice but it will be soon 5000 or even 10.000
Any news about the reporter badges?
Just wanted to ask if someone has more info about that
Keep calm and report on guys
Just wanted to ask if someone has more info about that
Keep calm and report on guys
Not sure, theymos said fairly recently that he wants to implement it soon but he has more pressing/important things to deal with on the forum first.
By the way, I’m now finally in the 1000 successful reporters club
...Would be nice to see more User posting there Statistics !
Any news about the reporter badges?
Just wanted to ask if someone has more info about that
Keep calm and report on guys
Just wanted to ask if someone has more info about that
Keep calm and report on guys
Would be nice to see more User posting there Statistics !
Here is mine:
it's too far away compared to your report
Latest Update on the Reports !
The counts are not so much as normal because of other things and real life too !
Would be nice to see more User posting there Statistics !
The counts are not so much as normal because of other things and real life too !
Would be nice to see more User posting there Statistics !
Speaking of which, haven't seen Welsh in a while so I hope my world domination plan is working.
You win! I've been foiled with some of the new updates to ranks, and merit requirements 90% of the posts I come across I can remove myself. So, I rarely report these days. I can officially announce my retirement @ 39899 reports. I didn't even make it to 40k.
Pfffft.... anybody can get 40k reports in the altcoin boards. Try doing it in Bitcoin Discussion. (Seriously, please try. Would do wonders for clearing that board up.)
Do you use any automated tools to report this many posts? If you see several consecutive posts within the same thread, will you report each post, or make a single report?
I dont use automated tools for reporting !
All posts are reported with each clicking on the Report to Moderator Button !
I report every single post i see because the most times if you have an big thread they are dont in a row posted !
Sometimes if i found some spammer with a lot links maybe i do a single Post on Spambusters Thread and link the report to the post i have done there , so i dont have to report all with single reports !
Example here : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.50166053
Also report single posts makes the work for Mods easyer and the dont have to search things in a thread !
so I've reported it again, and the second report has been marked good.
Unfortunately, I can't see those report to make report again as you do. It is because those reports are too old. We can see only 1 months report. Speaking of which, haven't seen Welsh in a while so I hope my world domination plan is working.
Pfffft.... anybody can get 40k reports in the altcoin boards. Try doing it in Bitcoin Discussion. (Seriously, please try. Would do wonders for clearing that board up.) You have reported 856 posts with 99% accuracy (839 good, 11 bad, 6 unhandled).
I have 103 unhandled reports. How long these will remain unhandled? Of them, about 97 reports are more than 2 months old.
Probably indefinitely. Very rarely have I had a unhandled report which was more than a week old being dealt with. Think of it as a "soft bad". There have been a small handful of occasions where I've been absolutely sure a report should have been good despite it being unhandled for longer than a week (usually plagiarism), and so I've reported it again, and the second report has been marked good. I figure sometimes reports get missed in what must be a never-ending queue for the mods.
I have 103 unhandled reports. How long these will remain unhandled? Of them, about 97 reports are more than 2 months old.
I’m some way behind you reporting fanatics here
You have reported 856 posts with 99% accuracy (839 good, 11 bad, 6 unhandled). Do not worry about your accuracy too much; one accurate report is worth many inaccurate reports.
You have reported 856 posts with 99% accuracy (839 good, 11 bad, 6 unhandled). Do not worry about your accuracy too much; one accurate report is worth many inaccurate reports.
You have reported 1159 posts with 100% accuracy (1159 good, 0 bad, 0 unhandled).
Pfffft.... anybody can get 100% with zero bad reports. Try doing it with 263
39883 reports with 100% accuracy. 263 bad. 45 unhandled.
Speaking of which, haven't seen Welsh in a while so I hope my world domination plan is working.
^ Technically speaking Vod is correct, vphasitha01 cannot reach 100% accuracy because...wait for it...he is banned.
If vod mean that user already banned and that's why that is impossible then Vod is right. But I think Vod didn't mean that s/he thought as already a few incorrect reports, it is impossible to reach 100%. And if Vod knew then why s/he will ask to the poster as the poster will not be able to reply.Ebay does the same damn thing with their positive feedback %, and thus there are tons of sellers with 100% positive but who actually have some negatives somewhere in there.
I do not think it is a big deal either shows decimal or not. This percentage is not public it is private and the reporter can see how many good, bad or unhandled. Not sure why the reported accuracy can't use decimal places instead of (apparently) rounding.
Even rounding properly would be nice. At the moment, it always rounds up, which effectively means you can make 1 bad report for every 100 good ones (or 101 bad reports for every 10,000 good ones, if you want to be precise), and maintain a 100% accuracy rating, as 100/101=0.99009900... which gets rounded up to 1. That never made much sense to me.I would also quite like the reporter badges to be implemented. Don't see much point in him releasing up to date reporter statistics though unless he is going to use those numbers to inform a decision on new moderators.
It's same with me, 100% accuracy with 1950 good, 5 bad, 2 unhandled
Not sure why the reported accuracy can't use decimal places instead of (apparently) rounding. It's kind of annoying, given that there aren't any space constraints that I know of, and it wouldn't even be that difficult to show the accuracy down to 3 or more decimal places. Ebay does the same damn thing with their positive feedback %, and thus there are tons of sellers with 100% positive but who actually have some negatives somewhere in there.It'd be nice if Theymos dropped the numbers on us like he did last year or so, though I'm sure I've dropped a lot in the rankings. My reporting has gone down significantly since the merit system was created, even though it doesn't seem like the number of garbage posts has dropped as much.
^ Technically speaking Vod is correct, vphasitha01 cannot reach 100% accuracy because...wait for it...he is banned.
Not to be completely off-topic, had only 120 back in October, progress is slow but steady.
Where my reporter badge at?
Not to be completely off-topic, had only 120 back in October, progress is slow but steady.
Code:
You have reported 1159 posts with 100% accuracy (1159 good, 0 bad, 0 unhandled).
Where my reporter badge at?
BTW this is my report stats and my target is to get the 100% accuracy in future
You know that is impossible, right?
BTW this is my report stats and my target is to get the 100% accuracy in future
You know that is impossible, right?Jump to: