I suppose you have gone the post I made on review of 1xbit and tell me where I was wrong. 1xbit made both signature campaign and review thread and I chose not to join their signature campaign because of the controversies supporting betting platform generally. If you check internet you will understand no single betting platform have not witnessed scam accusations in the past. 1xbit review post receive both Negative and Positive review and it was welcome by them because that was what the 1xbit want.
I just read your 1xbit review. To be honest, it's not worth a cent. If they pay you for that, they can be considered deceived. It's not a review, it is more of a pure enumeration of what is on their site. if I don't know anything about them, what you wrote will certainly not convince me to use their service.
I would rather label you as someone who writes nonsense just for the sake of a monetary reward.
About your negative tag, Jolly wants to mark all paid 1xbit supporters. that is his right here. it wouldn't be a problem for you that he is not a DT member and that makes it difficult for you to participate in other campaigns, where you will write anything to make some money.
So, I guess, JollGood maybe it can just change the explanation in the feedback itself (in your case)
btw. about negative tag to all participants in 1xbit review, I think that's wrong. if there were a case where someone wrote really honestly and listed all their problems (which would turn out to be a negative review), whether such a person should also be marked as red?
if so, why? he wrote the truth
if not, why not? anyone who participates in their campaign should be marked negatively.
